Reyady Abaseya vs Racing: match statistics
Reyady Abaseya vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Reyady Abaseya played against Racing in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on July 13, 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Reyady Abaseya has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Racing has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Reyady Abaseya scores 0.76 goals per game and allows 1.43. Racing scores 0.24 and allows 2.95. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Reyady Abaseya's games and 24% of Racing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 52%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Reyady Abaseya has the higher season xG average, 0.86 to 0.62 per game. Reyady Abaseya takes 5.0 shots per game, while Racing takes 3.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Reyady Abaseya leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Racing leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Reyady Abaseya's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Racing, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Lebanese Premier League games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Reyady Abaseya average 0.50 goals at home versus just 0.09 goals scored by Racing away, with shot conversion 14% compared to 3% in favor of the hosts. Defensively Reyady concede 1.30 goals at home on average, while Racing concede 2.55 goals away and have an away goal difference of -27, indicating serious defensive issues for the visitors. In terms of chance quality Reyady record xG 0.82 at home with xG against 1.30, whereas Racing have xG 0.65 away with xG against 1.66, which further favors the hosts. Additionally the visitors have not recorded any wins this season and have failed to score in 91% of their away matches, while Reyady have scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches and have a higher probability of breaking through.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend the “No” scenario: Racing rarely scores — averaging 0.09 goals per match this season (5 goals) and only 0.2 in the last 5 matches (1 goal), which significantly reduces the chance of BTTS. Reyady Abaseya average 0.4 goals per match this season (16 goals) and 0.8 in the last 5, but they concede an average of 3.4 goals per match season-to-date (30 conceded) and 12 in the last 5, which often yields one-sided results. xG indicates both teams create few chances (xG_for 0.59 vs 0.65) while conceding relatively high xG_against (1.83 vs 1.66), and the visitors’ shot conversion is only 3% versus 8% for the hosts, so Racing rarely converts opportunities into goals. Season BTTS rates are 40% for Reyady and just 9% for Racing, and in the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS at 20%; league BTTS rate is 31% with 80% of matches featuring a clean sheet in the league, therefore the stronger signal from the data supports No Goal (80% vs 20%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.12 goals for the home side (xG for attack 0.59 and xG against opponents 1.66 -> average 1.12) and 1.24 goals for the away side (xG for attack 0.65 and xG against home 1.83 -> average 1.24), total ≈2.36. Seasonal tendencies support Over 1.5: home team has 90% of matches over 1.5, away team 82% (average 86%), while for the 2.5 line home 70% vs away 36% (average 53%), so 2.5 is more uncertain. Both teams concede heavily — Reyady have conceded 30 goals at home (3.4 per game), Racing conceded 62 goals (2.55 per game); in the last 5 matches the home side conceded 2.4 per game (12 in 5), away 2.6 (13 in 5), which increases the probability of multiple goals. However low finishing reduces the chance of a very high-scoring game: both teams average 4.0 shots, home conversion 8% and away 3%, therefore Over 3.5 (≈39%) is a weaker signal. As a result the strongest pick is Over 1.5 (≈86%), while the 2.5 line remains marginal (≈53%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Reyady Abaseya lost 100% of their matches (losePercentage_home = 100.0) and were trailing at half-time in 90% of games (trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 90.0), which strongly indicates weak starts at home. Racing also has poor results (losePercentage_away = 91.0), but shows a slight advantage in chance creation: away xG is 0.65 versus 0.59 for the home side (xg_for_avg_away = 0.65 vs xg_for_avg_home = 0.59), while the hosts concede more opponent opportunities (xg_against_avg_home = 1.83 vs xg_against_avg_away = 1.66). At half-time the hosts concede on average 1.9 goals (concededAVGHT_home = 1.9) whereas Racing concedes 1.0 (concededAVGHT_away = 1.0), so a lead for the visitors after 45 minutes is more likely. For the full match the signal is even stronger: Reyady score on average 0.4 and concede 3.4 per game (seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.4, seasonConcededAVG_home = 3.4), while Racing have 0.09 scored and 2.55 conceded (seasonScoredAVG_away = 0.09, seasonConcededAVG_away = 2.55). Therefore my BEST pick is 2/2 (visitor lead at half-time and win at full-time), with a realistic alternative being X/2 (draw at half-time, visitors win at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Reyady Abaseya | Racing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Reyady Abaseya is 217% better for: goals scored per game.
0.76 goals / game - Reyady Abaseya · 0.24 goals / game - Racing
Reyady Abaseya is 106% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Reyady Abaseya · 2.95 goals / game - Racing
Reyady Abaseya scores in 43% of games (9 of 21 meczów), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 21 meczów).
Racing scores in 24% of games (5 of 21 meczów), while Reyady Abaseya keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Reyady Abaseya
Over / Under - Racing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Reyady Abaseya is 479% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Reyady Abaseya · 0.19 pts / game - Racing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Reyady Abaseya - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Racing - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Reyady Abaseya
Racing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Reyady Abaseya | Liga | Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.19 | 2.47 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | • 33% | 34% | ▼ 24% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 45% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 39% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | • 57% | 58% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Reyady Abaseya's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Racing. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Reyady Abaseya vs Racing?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Reyady Abaseya 4:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Reyady Abaseya and Racing?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Reyady Abaseya won 2, Racing won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Reyady Abaseya vs Racing?
Reyady Abaseya score 0.76 goals per game on average and Racing 0.24. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Reyady Abaseya's matches and 24% of Racing's.
What form are Reyady Abaseya and Racing in?
Over the last 5 games Reyady Abaseya have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Racing 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Reyady Abaseya vs Racing?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Reyady Abaseya vs Racing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.