Latvia - 1. LigaOC Rēzekne Mākslīgais LaukumsData current as of September 06, 2026

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe: match statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS crest
Rēzekne / BJSS
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Mārupe crest
Mārupe

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rēzekne / BJSS played against Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on July 25, 2026. Venue: OC Rēzekne Mākslīgais Laukums. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Rēzekne / BJSS has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Mārupe has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.77 goals per game and allows 2.85. Mārupe scores 1.69 and allows 1.46. Games in this league average 3.45 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Rēzekne / BJSS's games and 46% of Mārupe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 77%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Mārupe has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 0.74 per game. Rēzekne / BJSS takes 3.2 shots per game, while Mārupe takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Rēzekne / BJSS leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. Mārupe leads at halftime in 23% and scores 1.31 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rēzekne / BJSS's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Mārupe, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.45 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mārupe has a clear advantage this season: they have scored 22 goals and sit 6th, while Rēzekne / BJSS have only 10 goals and are 14th. The visitors’ defense is markedly better — the home side concedes 2.86 goals per home match, whereas Mārupe concedes only 0.83 on the road; visitors have 50% clean sheets away, hosts 0% at home. Quality of chances also favors Mārupe: average xG away is 1.46 versus 0.88 xG for the hosts at home, and the visitors average 10.33 shots (4.83 on target) per game compared to Rēzekne’s 4.75 (3.5 on target). In the last 5 matches the hosts have just 0.2 points per game, 0 wins and have conceded 11 goals, while Mārupe has 1.2 points per game, 2 wins and scored 6 goals. Considering the defensive advantage (0.83 vs 2.86), higher xG (1.46 vs 0.88) and greater shot volume (10.33 vs 4.75), I predict an away win for Mārupe.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The league posts BTTS at 60% with an average of 3.43 goals per game, favoring matches with goals at both ends. Rēzekne has a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% and averages 2.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded per match, while Mārupe records BTTS 33% with averages of 1.33 scored and 0.83 conceded. In the last 5 matches Rēzekne had BTTS 60% and conceded 2.2 goals on average (11 conceded in 5), and Mārupe had BTTS 40% and conceded 2.0 on average (10 conceded), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG and shot statistics are similar (xG 1.47 vs 1.46, avg. 10.5 vs 10.33 shots), and the home side shows higher finishing efficiency 21% vs 13%, so both sides are creating realistic chances. Considering the league’s 60% BTTS, the home side’s 100% Over2.5, and recent high goals conceded in the last 5, I select BTTS - Yes as the more probable outcome (70% vs 30%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 1.47 + 1.46 = 2.93, placing the match close to the 2.5 goals threshold and slightly below the league average of 3.43 goals per game. Rēzekne/BJSS records 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, while Mārupe has 50% — a strong signal in favor of Over 2.5, especially given the league-wide 68% Over 2.5 rate. The home side averages 10.5 shots with 4.67 on target and a 21% conversion rate; the visitors average 10.33 shots with 4.83 on target and a 13% conversion. Rēzekne’s superior finishing increases the likelihood that their 1.47 xG will convert into goals. Although Rēzekne have averaged only 0.8 goals and conceded 11 goals in their last five matches, the season-long home Over 2.5 rate (100%) and BTTS 57% indicate a high probability of goals from both sides. Based on this, I recommend the Over side on the 2.5 line as the best bet: combined xG 2.93, home season Over2.5 100% and league average 3.43 form the strongest and most value-driven signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Based on half-time statistics, the away team is more likely to hold the lead at the break: hosts were behind at half-time in 57% of matches and concede an average of 0.86 goals in the first half, whereas the away side concedes only 0.17 goals in that phase and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 83% of games. By full-time the away advantage remains visible: they have 50% wins this season versus 43% for the hosts and concede on average 0.83 goals over the season compared with 2.0 for the hosts, suggesting they will maintain the lead obtained by half-time. On the other hand the hosts score heavily after the break — averaging 1.57 goals in the second half and with 100% of their matches featuring at least one goal after half-time — so a turnaround (2/1 or X/1) is a realistic possibility. Given that the xG of both teams is practically equal (1.47 vs 1.46), the most likely scenario is the away team leading at half-time and holding the win to full-time (2/2), with the chance of the hosts overturning the deficit in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
-1Shots-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
-1Shots on target-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0xG0
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
-1Corners-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0Dangerous attacks0
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
-1Fouls-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
-1Cards-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0.77Goals scored / game1.69
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
2.85Goals allowed / game1.46
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
31%Average possession49%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
1.62Shots on target / game4.31
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

3.23Shots per game9.54
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
1.62Shots on target4.31
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
23.8%Shot conversion17.7%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
31%Possession49%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0.74xG for1.46
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
2.31xG against1.18
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

Shooting quality

Rēzekne / BJSS: Counter-attackingMārupe: Efficient finishing
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
Accuracy (shots on target)50%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rēzekne / BJSS is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.6 pts / game - Mārupe

Rēzekne / BJSS
WLLDL
Season result split
8% W15% R77% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-10
0.38 pts / game · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mārupe
LLLWL
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mārupe is 119% better for: goals scored per game.

0.77 goals / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.69 goals / game - Mārupe

Mārupe is 95% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.85 goals / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.46 goals / game - Mārupe

Rēzekne / BJSS scoring profile: mixed

Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 54% of games (7 of 13 meczów), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 meczów).

Mārupe scoring profile: very strong

Mārupe scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 meczów).

10Goals scored (season)22
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
37Goals conceded (season)19
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
3.62Average goals per game3.15
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal77%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
23%2 goals46%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0%3 goals23%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0%4 goals23%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal62%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
69%2 goals46%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
54%3 goals23%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
38%4 goals15%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time8%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
15%Scored in both halves15%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS31%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
60%BTTS - last 560%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
46%Min. 3 goals after half-time54%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mārupe is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.08 pts / game - Mārupe

Rēzekne / BJSS - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
Mārupe - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per game (1st half)1.08
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
1.08Average goals (1st half)0.92
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
31%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
77%No goal before half-time69%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

After half-time (2nd half)

0.77Points per game (2nd half)1.31
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)1.31
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
1.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
2Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
31%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe
62%No goal after half-time38%
Rēzekne / BJSSMārupe

Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results

15% W31% R54% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 8%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mārupe - second-half results

38% W15% R46% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Rēzekne / BJSS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mārupe - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.60
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.21.4
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rēzekne / BJSS
ScoredConceded
2
12
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
8
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
5
3
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rēzekne / BJSS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
175%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rēzekne / BJSSLigaMārupe
Average goals per game 3.623.45 3.15
Both teams scored 54%62% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%67% 77%
Clean sheets 0%22% 38%
Goal before half-time 77%72% 69%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.45
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.63
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rēzekne / BJSS's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Mārupe. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Mārupe
4 : 0
Rēzekne / BJSS
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS
2 : 1
FK Mārupe
FK Mārupe
1 : 1
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS

FAQ

What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe?

The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 1:2 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rēzekne / BJSS and Mārupe?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rēzekne / BJSS won 1, Mārupe won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe?

Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.77 goals per game on average and Mārupe 1.69. The 1. Liga average is 3.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 46% of Mārupe's.

What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Mārupe in?

Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Mārupe 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe?

The statistical background for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.