RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RFC Seraing play AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 5 December 2025 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

RFC Seraing: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

RFC Seraing scores 1.16 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RFC Seraing 50%, AS Eupen 53%. Over 2.5: RFC Seraing 50%, AS Eupen 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

RFC Seraing has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.21. RFC Seraing: 11.8 shots per match, AS Eupen: 10.5.

Match halves

RFC Seraing: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81. AS Eupen: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (10 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9Shots9
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
3Shots on target4
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.07xG1.08
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
4Corners1
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
40Dangerous attacks30
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
16Fouls13
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
2Cards3
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.16Goals scored / match1.38
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.38Goals conceded / match1.13
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
41%Average possession52%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
4Shots on target / match3.81
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match10.5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
4Shots on target3.81
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9.8%Shot conversion13.1%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
41%Possession52%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.37xG for1.21
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.48xG against1.61
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Shooting quality

RFC Seraing: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen

RFC Seraing
DDWDL
Season result split
25% W34% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

37Goals scored (season)44
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
44Goals conceded (season)36
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
2.53Average goals in match2.5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
6Goals scored (last 5)6
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal84%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
31%2 goals38%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
13%3 goals13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
6%4 goals3%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal63%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
47%2 goals38%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
13%3 goals13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
3%4 goals0%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
3%BTTS in both halves6%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
19%Scored in both halves16%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
60%BTTS - last 540%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen

RFC Seraing - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.5
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.72
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.25
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
72%No goal before half-time50%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.44
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.25
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
56%Clean sheet after half-time59%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen
44%No goal after half-time50%
RFC SeraingAS Eupen

RFC Seraing - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
3
9
31-45
9
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RFC SeraingLigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 2.532.84 2.50
Both teams scored 50%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%54% 47%
Clean sheets 28%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 56%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%79% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RFC Seraing 0 - 1 - 0 AS Eupen. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 0:1 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?

RFC Seraing score 1.16 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of RFC Seraing's matches and 53% of AS Eupen's.

What form are RFC Seraing and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.