RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen: match statistics
RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RFC Seraing played against AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on December 5, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
RFC Seraing has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. AS Eupen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
RFC Seraing scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.64. AS Eupen scores 1.43 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of RFC Seraing's games and 57% of AS Eupen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
RFC Seraing has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.08 per game. RFC Seraing takes 12.6 shots per game, while AS Eupen takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 7% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. AS Eupen leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.64 after halftime.
When the teams score
RFC Seraing's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For AS Eupen, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RFC Seraing | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AS Eupen is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - RFC Seraing · 1.43 goals / game - AS Eupen
AS Eupen is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.64 goals / game - RFC Seraing · 1.14 goals / game - AS Eupen
RFC Seraing scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 meczów).
AS Eupen scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
Over / Under - AS Eupen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AS Eupen is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.71 pts / game - RFC Seraing · 1.43 pts / game - AS Eupen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
AS Eupen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RFC Seraing
AS Eupen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RFC Seraing | Liga | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.64 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 53% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 50% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 27% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 74% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 80% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?
The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 0:1 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?
RFC Seraing score 1.00 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.43. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of RFC Seraing's matches and 57% of AS Eupen's.
What form are RFC Seraing and AS Eupen in?
Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RFC Seraing vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.