Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 06, 2026

RFC Seraing vs KRC Genk II: match statistics

RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing
2 : 2half-time 0:2
KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II
155%(2.38)
X25%(3.30)
220%(2.50)

RFC Seraing displays excellent form in their last five matches with four victories and an 11:4 goal ratio, translating to an impressive 2.4 points per game. The hosts are noticeably more effective at their own stadium, winning 33% of matches and conceding an average of only 1.33 goals, which provides a significant edge over the visitors. KRC Genk II is in poor form, averaging just 0.8 points per game over their last five fixtures and harboring an appalling away record - only 15% wins and a massive 54% loss rate on the road. The visitors concede an average of 2 away goals and hold a negative goal difference of -11, which, coupled with their poor efficiency (9% shot conversion rate), makes them the clear underdog. Taking all statistics into account, RFC Seraing has a realistic chance of securing a win, although KRC Genk II might put up some resistance, hence a slight probability of a draw should also be considered.

RFC Seraing vs KRC Genk II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

RFC Seraing played against KRC Genk II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

RFC Seraing has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. KRC Genk II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

RFC Seraing scores 1.15 goals per game and allows 1.44. KRC Genk II scores 1.22 and allows 1.89. Games in this league average 2.77 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of RFC Seraing's games and 59% of KRC Genk II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 59%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KRC Genk II has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.38 per game. RFC Seraing takes 11.8 shots per game, while KRC Genk II takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.59 after halftime.

When the teams score

RFC Seraing's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For KRC Genk II, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.77 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

RFC Seraing displays excellent form in their last five matches with four victories and an 11:4 goal ratio, translating to an impressive 2.4 points per game. The hosts are noticeably more effective at their own stadium, winning 33% of matches and conceding an average of only 1.33 goals, which provides a significant edge over the visitors. KRC Genk II is in poor form, averaging just 0.8 points per game over their last five fixtures and harboring an appalling away record - only 15% wins and a massive 54% loss rate on the road. The visitors concede an average of 2 away goals and hold a negative goal difference of -11, which, coupled with their poor efficiency (9% shot conversion rate), makes them the clear underdog. Taking all statistics into account, RFC Seraing has a realistic chance of securing a win, although KRC Genk II might put up some resistance, hence a slight probability of a draw should also be considered.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
19Shots10
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
5Shots on target5
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.89xG1.16
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
7Corners3
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
49Dangerous attacks23
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
15Fouls5
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1Cards1
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.15Goals scored / game1.22
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.44Goals allowed / game1.89
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
40%Average possession50%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
3.89Shots on target / game4.26
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.85Shots per game13.04
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
3.89Shots on target4.26
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
9.7%Shot conversion9.4%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
40%Possession50%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.38xG for1.43
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.52xG against1.68
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

Shooting quality

RFC Seraing: BalancedKRC Genk II: Balanced
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

RFC Seraing is 200% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - RFC Seraing · 0.8 pts / game - KRC Genk II

RFC Seraing
WLWWW
Season result split
26% W30% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-12
1.07 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
KRC Genk II
WLLLD
Season result split
22% W22% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-15
0.89 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KRC Genk II is 6% better for: goals scored per game.

1.15 goals / game - RFC Seraing · 1.22 goals / game - KRC Genk II

RFC Seraing is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - RFC Seraing · 1.89 goals / game - KRC Genk II

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 63% of games (17 of 27 meczów), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)33
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
39Goals conceded (season)51
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
2.59Average goals per game3.11
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
10Goals scored (last 5)5
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal67%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
30%2 goals37%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
15%3 goals15%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
7%4 goals4%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal81%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
48%2 goals59%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
15%3 goals26%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
4%4 goals19%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time30%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
4%BTTS in both halves11%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
19%Scored in both halves22%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
20%BTTS - last 540%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KRC Genk II is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / game - RFC Seraing · 1 pts / game - KRC Genk II

RFC Seraing - half-time state
11% leading52% draw37% trailing
KRC Genk II - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per game (1st half)1
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.63
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.56
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
52%Clean sheet before half-time37%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
70%No goal before half-time56%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per game (2nd half)0.96
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.56
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
56%Clean sheet after half-time41%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II
48%No goal after half-time56%
RFC SeraingKRC Genk II

RFC Seraing - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding236%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KRC Genk II - second-half results

19% W41% R41% P
27
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

RFC Seraing - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.60
Goals scored / game0.81.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
KRC Genk II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.2
Average goals per game1.60.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
2
6
16-30
2
8
31-45
6
5
46-60
6
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
4
7
16-30
8
10
31-45
4
7
46-60
6
9
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RFC SeraingLigaKRC Genk II
Average goals per game 2.592.77 3.11
Both teams scored 48%54% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%51% 59%
Clean sheets 26%27% 19%
Goal before half-time 59%71% 78%
Goal after half-time 74%78% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.77
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KRC Genk IIGoalDjoully NzokoAssist: Ayumu Yokoyama
  2. KRC Genk IIGoalAyumu YokoyamaAssist: Kenan Haroun
  3. KRC Genk IIYellow cardEmmanuel Jeriel Sarfo
  4. RFC SeraingGoalMatthieu Muland Kayij
  5. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Nabil Bouchentouf IdrissOff: Cheikhou Omar Ndiaye
  6. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Jonathan CoenenOff: Djoully Nzoko
  7. RFC SeraingYellow cardFostave Mabani
  8. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Precious Susses OgbeiwiOff: Myung-Jun Kim
  9. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Thiago Paulo da SilvaOff: Oussmane Kébé
  10. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Wout KapersOff: Kenan Haroun
  11. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Serigne Saliou FayeOff: Abdoulaye Agne Ba
  12. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Valerio Di CrescenzoOff: Édouard Soumah-Abbad

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jasper VitseMatches officiated: 19
3.05Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins26%Draws32%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from RFC Seraing's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against KRC Genk II. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Jong KRC Genk
0 : 0
RFC Seraing

FAQ

What was the result of RFC Seraing vs KRC Genk II?

The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 2:2 KRC Genk II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs KRC Genk II?

RFC Seraing score 1.15 goals per game on average and KRC Genk II 1.22. The First Division B average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of RFC Seraing's matches and 59% of KRC Genk II's.

What form are RFC Seraing and KRC Genk II in?

Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and KRC Genk II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs KRC Genk II?

The statistical background for RFC Seraing vs KRC Genk II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.