Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne: match statistics
Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Richmond Kickers played against Fort Wayne in USL League One (United States). The game was played on June 20, 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Richmond Kickers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Fort Wayne has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Richmond Kickers scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.55. Fort Wayne scores 1.25 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Richmond Kickers's games and 50% of Fort Wayne's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 33%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fort Wayne has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.31 per game. Richmond Kickers takes 11.2 shots per game, while Fort Wayne takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Richmond Kickers leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. Fort Wayne leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Richmond Kickers's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Fort Wayne, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fort Wayne is the favorite in this match due to superior form and league position: they sit 6th versus Richmond’s 14th, have scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches versus the home side’s 3, and have averaged 1.2 points per match in that period compared to just 0.2 for Richmond. Defensively the visitors have a clear advantage — Richmond conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match), while Fort Wayne conceded 7 (1.4 per match); season averages show 1.0 goals conceded at home versus 1.29 for the away side. Offensively Richmond creates more chances at home (14 shots and 5 on target on average with xG 1.59), while Fort Wayne away averages 11.29 shots, 3 on target and xG 1.28; however shot conversion is 9% for Richmond and 10% for Fort Wayne, and the home side have only 3 goals in their last 5. Additionally Fort Wayne control games on the road (53% possession) and have a higher away draw rate (43%), which gives them greater points stability; at the same time Richmond’s very poor run (0.2 points in the last 5) significantly increases the risk of a home defeat. Therefore I forecast a Fort Wayne win, although a draw remains a realistic scenario given Richmond’s ability to create chances at home.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Richmond presents a strong seasonal case against BTTS: 60% clean sheets and only 0.6 goals conceded per match on average, with the home-season BTTS rate at 40%. Fort Wayne, conversely, has a seasonal BTTS of 57% and an 80% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches; the visitors scored 7 goals in those 5 (1.4 avg), while Richmond conceded 12 in those 5 (2.4 avg). League-wide BTTS incidence is 56%, and xG indicates Richmond creates more chances (1.82 xG vs 1.28 xG for Fort Wayne) and registers more shots on target (5.8 vs 3.0), suggesting potential for goals from both sides. Weighing the conflicting signals — Richmond’s 60% clean sheets versus Fort Wayne’s strong recent scoring form (80% BTTS last 5) and 1.4 away goals in last 5 — I favor the "YES" (BTTS - Yes) scenario and estimate BTTS probability at approximately 60%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Estimated xG for this match is approximately 1.74 for Richmond and 1.24 for Fort Wayne, totaling 2.98 expected goals and providing a strong signal for Over 1.5 goals. Richmond generates more chances (avg. 16.0 shots and 5.8 on target) versus Fort Wayne (11.29 shots and 3.0 on target), and their attacking xG is 1.82 vs 1.28, so the hosts will create clear opportunities. Season stats show both teams frequently exceed 1.5 goals (Richmond 60% of matches, Fort Wayne 86%), while Over 2.5 is less certain (40% and 29%), explaining the moderate probability for Over 2.5. Given the calculated probabilities (Over 1.5 ~80%, Over 2.5 ~57%, Over 3.5 ~35%), I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most likely selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Richmond has a season xG of 1.82 versus Fort Wayne’s 1.28 and averages 5.8 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 3.0, indicating the home side’s advantage in chance creation. At the same time the hosts concede only 0.6 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 60% of games; they maintain a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of matches and are level at the break in 80% of their games, which strongly favors a draw at half-time. The visitors have a season BTTS of 57% and concede 1.29 goals per match while in their last five fixtures they averaged 1.2 points versus the hosts’ 0.2, so they are particularly dangerous in the second half. Given the high half-time draw rate (80%) and the hosts’ high overall draw rate (60%), the most likely scenario is draw/draw (X/X) — I assign it 36%; alternatively draw then home turnaround (X/1) 28% and draw then away turnaround (X/2) 12%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Richmond Kickers | Fort Wayne | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fort Wayne is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Richmond Kickers · 1.4 pts / game - Fort Wayne
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fort Wayne is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Richmond Kickers · 1.25 goals / game - Fort Wayne
Fort Wayne is 55% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.55 goals / game - Richmond Kickers · 1 goals / game - Fort Wayne
Richmond Kickers scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 meczów), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
Fort Wayne scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
Over / Under - Fort Wayne
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fort Wayne is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / game - Richmond Kickers · 1.33 pts / game - Fort Wayne
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fort Wayne - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Richmond Kickers
Fort Wayne
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Richmond Kickers | Liga | Fort Wayne | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.55 | 2.91 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 59% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 24% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne?
The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 0:2 Fort Wayne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne?
Richmond Kickers score 1.00 goals per game on average and Fort Wayne 1.25. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 50% of Fort Wayne's.
What form are Richmond Kickers and Fort Wayne in?
Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Fort Wayne 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


