United States - USL League OneCity StadiumData current as of September 20, 2026

Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos: match statistics

Richmond Kickers crest
Richmond Kickers
2 : 0half-time 1:0
NY Cosmos crest
NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Richmond Kickers played against NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The game was played on August 5, 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Richmond Kickers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. NY Cosmos has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Richmond Kickers scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.94. NY Cosmos scores 1.06 and allows 2.24. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of Richmond Kickers's games and 65% of NY Cosmos's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 82%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

NY Cosmos has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.35 per game. Richmond Kickers takes 11.6 shots per game, while NY Cosmos takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Richmond Kickers leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. NY Cosmos leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.82 after halftime.

When the teams score

Richmond Kickers's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For NY Cosmos, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Richmond Kickers hold a slight edge, primarily due to home advantage: they have won 29% of their home matches, while NY Cosmos have lost every away game and concede an average of as many as 3.00 goals on the road. The hosts have also been far from clinical, scoring 0.71 goals per match at home and failing to score in 57% of their appearances, but Cosmos’ away defense, with no clean sheets on the road, gives them a good opportunity to break through. Richmond allow 1.60 xG at home, while the visitors generate 1.40 xG away from home, so Cosmos should create chances; however, their average of 0.88 goals scored limits their chances of taking all three points. The teams’ last five matches do not suggest strong attacking form, with Richmond scoring only 2 goals and Cosmos 3, reinforcing the scenario of a narrow home win. The difference in Cosmos’ away defensive record, with a -17 goal difference on the road, shifts the prediction towards Richmond Kickers.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

There is a slight edge towards BTTS - Yes, as the seasonal BTTS rates for both teams stand at 56% for Richmond and as high as 75% for NY Cosmos, compared with the league average of 55%. Richmond should have a good chance of scoring: their opponents have kept no clean sheets, concede an average of 3.00 goals per match, while the hosts generate an average of 1.56 xG. Cosmos’ chances of finding the net are supported by Richmond’s defensive record, with the team allowing an average of 1.56 goals and 1.55 xG, while conceding 9 goals in their last five matches, or 1.8 per game. The main risk to the pick is poor recent finishing, as Richmond have scored 2 goals and Cosmos 3 in their last five matches, with BTTS landing in only 20% and 40% of those games respectively. Therefore, the edge towards a both-teams-to-score scenario is limited.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as Richmond matches have exceeded this line in 78% of cases, while NY Cosmos matches have done so in as many as 100%. The hosts create an average of 1.56 xG, whereas Cosmos allow opponents 1.81 xG and concede a very high 3.00 goals per match. Richmond should be able to exploit this weakness, although their recent finishing has been limited to 0.4 goals per game across their last five matches. The visitors have also scored only 0.6 goals per game recently, which reduces confidence in Over 2.5 goals, but Richmond's defense concedes an average of 1.56 goals per match over the season and 1.8 across their last five appearances. The projected total of 2.65 goals indicates a clear advantage toward at least two goals, with more moderate risk on the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT signal points to a draw: Richmond were level at half-time in 67% of their matches, compared with 25% for NY Cosmos, while the visitors had drawn at the break in four of their last five games. Both teams start matches very poorly, averaging just 0.33 and 0.13 goals respectively before half-time, and neither side has scored in the first half in their last five appearances. After the break, the advantage should shift towards the hosts, who have won the second half in 44% of matches, compared with just 13% for Cosmos, while their opponents concede an average of 1.38 goals during that period. Across the season, NY Cosmos have not won a single match and have conceded an average of 3.00 goals, whereas Richmond average 1.22 points per home game. The hosts’ weaker recent attacking output, averaging only 0.4 goals over their last five matches, reduces confidence, but the HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Richmond win at full-time remains the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
15Shots9
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
5Shots on target4
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.79xG1.31
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
4Corners4
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
70Dangerous attacks64
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
13Fouls10
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
2Cards3
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.89Goals scored / game1.06
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.94Goals allowed / game2.24
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
42%Average possession46%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
3.78Shots on target / game4.18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.61Shots per game12.29
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
3.78Shots on target4.18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
7.7%Shot conversion8.6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
42%Possession46%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.35xG for1.49
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.77xG against1.67
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Shooting quality

Richmond Kickers: BalancedNY Cosmos: Balanced
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Richmond Kickers
DLLLW
Season result split
22% W17% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-11
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
NY Cosmos
LWDLL
Season result split
18% W12% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-12
0.65 pts / game · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NY Cosmos is 19% better for: goals scored per game.

0.89 goals / game - Richmond Kickers · 1.06 goals / game - NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.94 goals / game - Richmond Kickers · 2.24 goals / game - NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers scoring profile: strong

Richmond Kickers scores in 56% of games (10 of 18 games), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 games).

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 games), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 games).

16Goals scored (season)18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
35Goals conceded (season)38
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
2.83Average goals per game3.29
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal76%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
22%2 goals24%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
11%3 goals6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0%4 goals0%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal82%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
56%2 goals82%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
28%3 goals53%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%4 goals6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time12%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%Scored in both halves18%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
40%BTTS - last 520%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Richmond Kickers is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / game - Richmond Kickers · 0.65 pts / game - NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers - half-time state
17% leading39% draw44% trailing
NY Cosmos - half-time state
6% leading47% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per game (1st half)0.65
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.29
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
39%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
61%No goal before half-time82%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per game (2nd half)1.12
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.17Average goals (2nd half)2
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
56%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
72%No goal after half-time24%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers - second-half results

17% W44% D39% L
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

NY Cosmos - second-half results

29% W24% D47% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Richmond Kickers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
NY Cosmos - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Richmond Kickers
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
2
8
16-30
2
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
7
31-45
7
9
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Richmond Kickers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Richmond KickersLigaNY Cosmos
Average goals per game 2.832.89 3.29
Both teams scored 44%55% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%60% 82%
Clean sheets 17%26% 18%
Goal before half-time 78%69% 65%
Goal after half-time 61%77% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+63%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defensive advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Richmond KickersYellow cardOwen O'Malley
  2. Richmond KickersGoalDarwin EspinalAssist: Hayden Anderson
  3. NY CosmosYellow cardPhilip Spengler
  4. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: William NoeckerOff: Massimo Morabito
  5. Richmond KickersGoalDarwin Espinal
  6. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Tyler FreemanOff: Joshua Eric Kirkland
  7. NY CosmosYellow cardAnges Patrick Kader Bohui
  8. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Davide GalazziniOff: Nicholas Mendonca
  9. NY CosmosYellow cardDavide Galazzini
  10. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Tarik PannholzerOff: Darwin Espinal
  11. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Justin MilovanovOff: Ozzie Ramos
  12. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Landon JohnsonOff: Zahir Vasquez
  13. Richmond KickersYellow cardAli Sasankhah

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?

The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 2:0 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?

Richmond Kickers score 0.89 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.06. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 65% of NY Cosmos's.

What form are Richmond Kickers and NY Cosmos in?

Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and NY Cosmos 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?

The statistical background for Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.