Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos: match statistics
Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Richmond Kickers played against NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The game was played on August 5, 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Richmond Kickers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. NY Cosmos has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Richmond Kickers scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.94. NY Cosmos scores 1.06 and allows 2.24. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Richmond Kickers's games and 65% of NY Cosmos's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 82%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
NY Cosmos has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.35 per game. Richmond Kickers takes 11.6 shots per game, while NY Cosmos takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Richmond Kickers leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. NY Cosmos leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
Richmond Kickers's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For NY Cosmos, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Richmond Kickers hold a slight edge, primarily due to home advantage: they have won 29% of their home matches, while NY Cosmos have lost every away game and concede an average of as many as 3.00 goals on the road. The hosts have also been far from clinical, scoring 0.71 goals per match at home and failing to score in 57% of their appearances, but Cosmos’ away defense, with no clean sheets on the road, gives them a good opportunity to break through. Richmond allow 1.60 xG at home, while the visitors generate 1.40 xG away from home, so Cosmos should create chances; however, their average of 0.88 goals scored limits their chances of taking all three points. The teams’ last five matches do not suggest strong attacking form, with Richmond scoring only 2 goals and Cosmos 3, reinforcing the scenario of a narrow home win. The difference in Cosmos’ away defensive record, with a -17 goal difference on the road, shifts the prediction towards Richmond Kickers.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
There is a slight edge towards BTTS - Yes, as the seasonal BTTS rates for both teams stand at 56% for Richmond and as high as 75% for NY Cosmos, compared with the league average of 55%. Richmond should have a good chance of scoring: their opponents have kept no clean sheets, concede an average of 3.00 goals per match, while the hosts generate an average of 1.56 xG. Cosmos’ chances of finding the net are supported by Richmond’s defensive record, with the team allowing an average of 1.56 goals and 1.55 xG, while conceding 9 goals in their last five matches, or 1.8 per game. The main risk to the pick is poor recent finishing, as Richmond have scored 2 goals and Cosmos 3 in their last five matches, with BTTS landing in only 20% and 40% of those games respectively. Therefore, the edge towards a both-teams-to-score scenario is limited.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as Richmond matches have exceeded this line in 78% of cases, while NY Cosmos matches have done so in as many as 100%. The hosts create an average of 1.56 xG, whereas Cosmos allow opponents 1.81 xG and concede a very high 3.00 goals per match. Richmond should be able to exploit this weakness, although their recent finishing has been limited to 0.4 goals per game across their last five matches. The visitors have also scored only 0.6 goals per game recently, which reduces confidence in Over 2.5 goals, but Richmond's defense concedes an average of 1.56 goals per match over the season and 1.8 across their last five appearances. The projected total of 2.65 goals indicates a clear advantage toward at least two goals, with more moderate risk on the higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest HT signal points to a draw: Richmond were level at half-time in 67% of their matches, compared with 25% for NY Cosmos, while the visitors had drawn at the break in four of their last five games. Both teams start matches very poorly, averaging just 0.33 and 0.13 goals respectively before half-time, and neither side has scored in the first half in their last five appearances. After the break, the advantage should shift towards the hosts, who have won the second half in 44% of matches, compared with just 13% for Cosmos, while their opponents concede an average of 1.38 goals during that period. Across the season, NY Cosmos have not won a single match and have conceded an average of 3.00 goals, whereas Richmond average 1.22 points per home game. The hosts’ weaker recent attacking output, averaging only 0.4 goals over their last five matches, reduces confidence, but the HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Richmond win at full-time remains the most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Richmond Kickers | NY Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
NY Cosmos is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
0.89 goals / game - Richmond Kickers · 1.06 goals / game - NY Cosmos
Richmond Kickers is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.94 goals / game - Richmond Kickers · 2.24 goals / game - NY Cosmos
Richmond Kickers scores in 56% of games (10 of 18 games), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 games).
NY Cosmos scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 games), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
Over / Under - NY Cosmos
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Richmond Kickers is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / game - Richmond Kickers · 0.65 pts / game - NY Cosmos
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
NY Cosmos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Richmond Kickers
NY Cosmos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Richmond Kickers | Liga | NY Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.83 | 2.89 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 55% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 60% | ▲ 82% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 26% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 69% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 77% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?
The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 2:0 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?
Richmond Kickers score 0.89 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.06. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 65% of NY Cosmos's.
What form are Richmond Kickers and NY Cosmos in?
Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and NY Cosmos 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?
The statistical background for Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


