United States - USL League OneCity StadiumData current as of 06 August 2026

Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos: match statistics

Richmond Kickers crest
Richmond Kickers
2 : 0half-time 1:0
NY Cosmos crest
NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Richmond Kickers played NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 5 August 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Richmond Kickers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. NY Cosmos: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Richmond Kickers scores 0.89 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. NY Cosmos scores 1.06 and concedes 2.24. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Richmond Kickers 44%, NY Cosmos 65%. Over 2.5: Richmond Kickers 56%, NY Cosmos 82%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

NY Cosmos has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.35. Richmond Kickers: 11.6 shots per match, NY Cosmos: 12.3.

Match halves

Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33. NY Cosmos: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (6 goals). NY Cosmos: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Richmond Kickers hold a slight edge, primarily due to home advantage: they have won 29% of their home matches, while NY Cosmos have lost every away game and concede an average of as many as 3.00 goals on the road. The hosts have also been far from clinical, scoring 0.71 goals per match at home and failing to score in 57% of their appearances, but Cosmos’ away defence, with no clean sheets on the road, gives them a good opportunity to break through. Richmond allow 1.60 xG at home, while the visitors generate 1.40 xG away from home, so Cosmos should create chances; however, their average of 0.88 goals scored limits their chances of taking all three points. The teams’ last five matches do not suggest strong attacking form, with Richmond scoring only 2 goals and Cosmos 3, reinforcing the scenario of a narrow home win. The difference in Cosmos’ away defensive record, with a -17 goal difference on the road, shifts the prediction towards Richmond Kickers.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

There is a slight edge towards BTTS - Yes, as the seasonal BTTS rates for both teams stand at 56% for Richmond and as high as 75% for NY Cosmos, compared with the league average of 55%. Richmond should have a good chance of scoring: their opponents have kept no clean sheets, concede an average of 3.00 goals per match, while the hosts generate an average of 1.56 xG. Cosmos’ chances of finding the net are supported by Richmond’s defensive record, with the team allowing an average of 1.56 goals and 1.55 xG, while conceding 9 goals in their last five matches, or 1.8 per game. The main risk to the pick is poor recent finishing, as Richmond have scored 2 goals and Cosmos 3 in their last five matches, with BTTS landing in only 20% and 40% of those games respectively. Therefore, the edge towards a both-teams-to-score scenario is limited.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as Richmond matches have exceeded this line in 78% of cases, while NY Cosmos matches have done so in as many as 100%. The hosts create an average of 1.56 xG, whereas Cosmos allow opponents 1.81 xG and concede a very high 3.00 goals per match. Richmond should be able to exploit this weakness, although their recent finishing has been limited to 0.4 goals per game across their last five matches. The visitors have also scored only 0.6 goals per game recently, which reduces confidence in Over 2.5 goals, but Richmond's defense concedes an average of 1.56 goals per match over the season and 1.8 across their last five appearances. The projected total of 2.65 goals indicates a clear advantage toward at least two goals, with more moderate risk on the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT signal points to a draw: Richmond were level at half-time in 67% of their matches, compared with 25% for NY Cosmos, while the visitors had drawn at the break in four of their last five games. Both teams start matches very poorly, averaging just 0.33 and 0.13 goals respectively before half-time, and neither side has scored in the first half in their last five appearances. After the break, the advantage should shift towards the hosts, who have won the second half in 44% of matches, compared with just 13% for Cosmos, while their opponents concede an average of 1.38 goals during that period. Across the season, NY Cosmos have not won a single match and have conceded an average of 3.00 goals, whereas Richmond average 1.22 points per home game. The hosts’ weaker recent attacking output, averaging only 0.4 goals over their last five matches, reduces confidence, but the HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Richmond win at full-time remains the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17Shots9
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
6Shots on target4
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.99xG1.31
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
4Corners4
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
70Dangerous attacks64
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
13Fouls10
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
2Cards3
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.89Goals scored / match1.06
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.94Goals conceded / match2.24
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
42%Average possession46%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
3.78Shots on target / match4.18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.61Shots per match12.29
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
3.78Shots on target4.18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
7.7%Shot conversion8.6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
42%Possession46%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.35xG for1.49
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.77xG against1.67
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Shooting quality

Richmond Kickers: BalancedNY Cosmos: Balanced
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Richmond Kickers
DLLLW
Season result split
22% W17% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-11
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
NY Cosmos
LWDLL
Season result split
18% W12% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-12
0.65 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NY Cosmos is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.06 goals / match - NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.94 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 2.24 goals / match - NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers scoring profile: strong

Richmond Kickers scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

16Goals scored (season)18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
35Goals conceded (season)38
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
2.83Average goals in match3.29
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal76%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
22%2 goals24%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
11%3 goals6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0%4 goals0%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal82%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
56%2 goals82%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
28%3 goals53%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%4 goals6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time12%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%Scored in both halves18%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
40%BTTS - last 520%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Richmond Kickers is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 0.65 pts / match - NY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers - half-time state
17% leading39% draw44% trailing
NY Cosmos - half-time state
6% leading47% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)0.65
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.29
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
39%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
61%No goal before half-time82%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.12
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
1.17Average goals (2nd half)2
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
56%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos
72%No goal after half-time24%
Richmond KickersNY Cosmos

Richmond Kickers - second-half results

17% W44% R39% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NY Cosmos - second-half results

29% W24% R47% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Richmond Kickers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
NY Cosmos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Richmond Kickers
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
2
8
16-30
2
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
7
31-45
7
9
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Richmond Kickers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Richmond KickersLigaNY Cosmos
Average goals in match 2.832.89 3.29
Both teams scored 44%55% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%60% 82%
Clean sheets 17%26% 18%
Goal before half-time 78%69% 65%
Goal after half-time 61%77% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+63%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defence advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?

The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 2:0 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?

Richmond Kickers score 0.89 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.06. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 65% of NY Cosmos's.

What form are Richmond Kickers and NY Cosmos in?

Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and NY Cosmos 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos?

The statistical background for Richmond Kickers vs NY Cosmos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.