Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: match statistics
Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ried played against Wolfsberger AC in Bundesliga (Austria). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Ried has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Wolfsberger AC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ried scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.30. Wolfsberger AC scores 1.27 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.69 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Ried's games and 60% of Wolfsberger AC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 60%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ried has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.26 per game. Ried takes 12.1 shots per game, while Wolfsberger AC takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Ried leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Wolfsberger AC leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.47 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ried's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Wolfsberger AC, it is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Bundesliga games average 2.69 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a Ried win (1). At home Ried averages 1.4 goals scored and concedes only 1.13 per match, with xG 1.47 versus xG against 1.22, indicating superiority in the quality of created chances and greater defensive stability. Wolfsberger AC away averages 1.33 goals scored but concedes 1.8 goals, records only 7% clean sheets and as much as 60% losses on the road, highlighting clear problems away from home. Both teams have 38 goals in the season and 5 goals in the last 5 matches, but Ried attempts more shots per match (13.07 vs 10.73) and has higher xG (1.47 vs 1.27), which gives them better prospects of converting their advantage. Therefore I assign a 65% probability to a Ried win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a Wolfsberger win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators favor BTTS: Ried has BTTS 53% and Wolfsberger 67%, the pair average is around 60% which exceeds the league value of 56%. Both teams have similar xG (1.26 for Ried vs 1.27 for Wolfsberger) and seasonal goals per game 1.2 and 1.33; however Wolfsberger concedes an average of 1.8 goals and has only 7% clean sheets, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Contradictory signals come from form: in the last 5 matches BTTS dropped to 40% (Ried) and 20% (Wolfsberger), and both sides in this run averaged 1.0 goals scored and conceded 0.6 and 0.8 respectively, which lowers the projected BTTS share. Considering the seasonal BTTS advantage (avg ~60%), similar xG and Wolfsberger’s high goals conceded rate (1.8 + 7% clean sheets), I assign a higher probability to BTTS - Yes at 58% versus 42% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects a total of approximately 2.69 goals: attacking xG for Ried is 1.26 and for Wolfsberger 1.27, while defensive xG against are 1.34 (Ried) and 1.52 (Wolfsberger), which translates to ~1.39 expected goals for Ried and ~1.30 for Wolfsberger. With a sum of 2.69 the Poisson distribution yields ~75% probability for Over 1.5 goals, about 50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Season data confirm a tendency toward goalscoring matches: Wolfsberger have 93% of matches with Over 1.5 and 67% with Over 2.5, while Ried are 67% and 53% respectively (league average Over 2.5 is 51%). Additionally both teams have a high share of BTTS matches: Ried 53% and Wolfsberger 67%, and Wolfsberger keep clean sheets in only 7% of games, which increases the risk of goals from both sides, so the best pick is Over 1.5 with projected 1.39–1.30 goals and estimated Over 1.5 ≈75%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a half-time draw with a home victory (HT/FT X/1), because Ried drew at the break in 53% of matches, conceding only 0.33 goals on average by half-time and not conceding any goals before the break in their last five games. Ried improve after the break — they collected 19 points in second halves and have 1.27 points per game after half-time, whereas Wolfsberger have only 9 points and 0.6 PPG in second halves. Wolfsberger have a 60% loss rate this season and concede 1.8 goals per match on average, which increases the risk of them losing a lead in the second half. The xG of both teams is similar (1.26 for Ried vs 1.27 for Wolfsberger), but the visitors allow more xG against (1.52 versus 1.34), which supports the view that the home side is more likely to create the decisive situations after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ried | Wolfsberger AC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ried is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Ried · 1.4 goals / game - Wolfsberger AC
Ried scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 meczów), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 meczów).
Wolfsberger AC scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Ried keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ried
Over / Under - Wolfsberger AC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wolfsberger AC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Ried · 1.47 pts / game - Wolfsberger AC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ried - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Wolfsberger AC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 30%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ried
Wolfsberger AC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Ried | Liga | Wolfsberger AC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.57 | 2.69 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 25% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Ried's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Wolfsberger AC. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?
The Bundesliga match finished Ried 0:1 Wolfsberger AC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ried and Wolfsberger AC?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ried won 2, Wolfsberger AC won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?
Ried score 1.27 goals per game on average and Wolfsberger AC 1.27. The Bundesliga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ried's matches and 60% of Wolfsberger AC's.
What form are Ried and Wolfsberger AC in?
Over the last 5 games Ried have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wolfsberger AC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


