Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Riga FC II vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
2 : 1half-time 2:1
JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts

Riga FC II vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga FC II play JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 19:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Riga FC II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. JDFS Alberts: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga FC II scores 1.62 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. JDFS Alberts scores 2.15 and concedes 1.62. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga FC II 62%, JDFS Alberts 77%. Over 2.5: Riga FC II 69%, JDFS Alberts 77%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

JDFS Alberts has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.36. Riga FC II: 8.2 shots per match, JDFS Alberts: 14.4.

Match halves

Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69. JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.38.

Goals by minute

Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). JDFS Alberts: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Riga FC II holds a clear advantage in chance creation: averaging 21 shots and 14 on target per home match versus JDFS’s 10 shots and 6 on target, with average xG of 2.72 for the hosts and 1.62 for the visitors. At the same time the hosts’ defense looks weaker — they concede on average 3 goals per home match with xG against of 2.25, while JDFS allows on average 2 goals and xG against of 0.84. The visitors are more efficient with fewer chances: shot conversion 10% for JDFS versus 5% for Riga, which results in both teams averaging about 1 goal per match despite the xG gap. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 8 goals with a record of 2 wins and 3 losses (1.2 points per match), and JDFS scored 5 goals with a 2-1-2 record (1.4 points per match). Considering Riga’s superiority in volume and quality of opportunities (21 shots/14 on target, xG 2.72), but also their weaker defense and low efficiency, I predict a narrow home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
5Shots13
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
2Shots on target2
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
0.83xG1.69
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
0Corners9
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
49Dangerous attacks101
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
-1Fouls-1
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
-1Cards-1
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.62Goals scored / match2.15
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.77Goals conceded / match1.62
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
45%Average possession54%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
4.62Shots on target / match6.46
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.23Shots per match14.38
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
4.62Shots on target6.46
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
19.6%Shot conversion15%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
45%Possession54%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.36xG for1.9
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.68xG against1.22
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingJDFS Alberts: Attacking
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
Accuracy (shots on target)56%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II · 2 pts / match - JDFS Alberts

Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
JDFS Alberts
WDWLW
Season result split
54% W15% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-4
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.21Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JDFS Alberts is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Riga FC II · 2.15 goals / match - JDFS Alberts

JDFS Alberts is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II · 1.62 goals / match - JDFS Alberts

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

21Goals scored (season)28
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
23Goals conceded (season)21
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
3.38Average goals in match3.77
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
10Goals scored (last 5)13
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal85%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
62%2 goals54%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
15%3 goals38%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
8%4 goals23%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
62%2 goals46%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
23%3 goals15%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
8%4 goals15%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time23%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
38%Scored in both halves23%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
60%BTTS - last 560%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time77%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II · 1.31 pts / match - JDFS Alberts

Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
JDFS Alberts - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)1.31
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.77
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.54
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
38%No goal before half-time62%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.77
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)1.38
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
1.85Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
46%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts
46%No goal after half-time31%
Riga FC IIJDFS Alberts

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

46% W38% R15% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
JDFS Alberts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
8
5
61-75
8
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaJDFS Alberts
Average goals in match 3.383.43 3.77
Both teams scored 62%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 77%
Clean sheets 15%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 62%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Riga FC II 0 - 0 - 2 JDFS Alberts. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Riga FC II
1 : 3
JDFS Alberts
JDFS Alberts
4 : 0
Riga FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs JDFS Alberts?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 2:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and JDFS Alberts?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, JDFS Alberts won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs JDFS Alberts?

Riga FC II score 1.62 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.15. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Riga FC II's matches and 77% of JDFS Alberts's.

What form are Riga FC II and JDFS Alberts in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs JDFS Alberts?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.