Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of September 07, 2026

Riga FC II vs JFK Ventspils: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
4 : 2half-time 3:0
JFK Ventspils crest
JFK Ventspils

Riga FC II vs JFK Ventspils: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Riga FC II played against JFK Ventspils in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 4:2.

Recent form

Riga FC II has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. JFK Ventspils has 0 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 0.50 points per game.

Scoring records

Riga FC II scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 2.00. JFK Ventspils scores 1.50 and allows 2.25. Games in this league average 3.61 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Riga FC II's games and 75% of JFK Ventspils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 75%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JFK Ventspils has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.34 per game. Riga FC II takes 9.5 shots per game, while JFK Ventspils takes 6.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Riga FC II leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. JFK Ventspils leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Riga FC II's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For JFK Ventspils, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.61 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga FC II are favorites due to superior form — 2 wins in their last 5 matches and 1.4 points per game in that period, while JFK Ventspils have no wins in five and only 0.6 points per game. The home side score on average 1.5 goals at home with 8 shots on target and xG 1.78, whereas the visitors average 2.0 goals away with a higher conversion rate of 23% and xG 1.96, indicating greater efficiency on similar shot volume (13). Defensively both teams are prone to conceding — Riga concedes 2.0 goals per game at home, Ventspils as many as 3.0 away, both sides have 0% clean sheets, and the last 5 matches show 9 scored and 8 conceded (Riga) versus 7 and 9 (Ventspils). Considering 50% home wins for Riga versus 0% away wins for Ventspils, plus the form advantage and stronger home xG, I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes is strong: the away team has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% with 0% clean sheets, the league BTTS rate is 59%, and the home team has 50% BTTS. Both sides regularly concede — seasonally the home team concedes 1.5 goals, the away team 3.0, and in the last 5 matches respectively 1.6 and 1.8 goals per match. The away attack looks aggressive: away xG_for is 1.96 versus the home 1.21, average shots 13 versus 6 and shots on target 7 versus 3, which increases the likelihood that the home side will concede at least once. However, the hosts can score — in the last 5 matches they have 9 goals (1.8 per match) versus the away side's 7 (1.4) — so both teams have scoring potential. Considering 0% clean sheets for both teams and high average goals conceded, I assign 80% probability to Yes and 20% to No as the most justified forecast.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model combines team xG and opponent defense: expected goals are 1.49 for Riga FC II (calculated as (1.21 + 1.77)/2) and 1.64 for JFK Ventspils (calculated as (1.96 + 1.31)/2), total 3.13. JFK Ventspils averages 2.0 goals scored per match (xG 1.96) and concedes as many as 3.0, while Riga FC II scores 1.0 and concedes 1.5; additionally the visitors average 13 shots and 7 on target with a 23% conversion rate, which generates many scoring opportunities. League average goals per match is 3.48, and in the last 5 fixtures Riga registered 9 goals (1.8 per match) and conceded 8 (1.6), Ventspils had 7 goals (1.4) and conceded 9 (1.8); the hosts’ last 5 matches produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases, the visitors in 60%. Season-long indicators confirm an offensive profile: visitors have 100% of matches with BTTS and 100% of matches Over 2.5 (season data), hosts have Over 2.5 in 50% of matches, which together increases the likelihood of more goals. Based on this I recommend the Over side on the 2.5 line as the strongest signal: I estimate Over 2.5 at 75% vs Under 25% (for reference Over 1.5 85%, Over 3.5 around 40%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics clearly favor the visitors: visitors’ xG is 1.96 versus 1.21 for the hosts, average shots 13.0 vs 6.0 and shots on target 7.0 vs 3.0, indicating a clear offensive advantage for JFK Ventspils. The visitors average 2.0 goals per match compared to 1.0 for Riga FC II and have a higher conversion rate (23% vs 17%), which increases the likelihood of a final win for the visitors. At half-time the hosts concede an average of 1.5 goals (concededAVGHT_home 1.5) while the visitors concede 0.5 (concededAVGHT_away 0.5); seasonal data show the hosts were trailing at the break in 100.0% of cases (trailingAtHTPercentage_home 100.0), whereas the visitors led at half-time in 50.0% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_away 50.0). In the second half the visitors’ dominance is even more pronounced — AVG_2hg_away is 4.0 versus 0.5 for the hosts, and the visitors score an average of 1.5 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_away 1.5), which supports maintaining or extending the lead. Based on this, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and winning the match (HT/FT 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
10Shots10
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
9Shots on target6
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
1.55xG1.64
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
6Corners14
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
39Dangerous attacks80
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
-1Fouls-1
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
-1Cards-1
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
1.25Goals scored / game1.5
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
2Goals allowed / game2.25
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
53%Average possession36%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
5.75Shots on target / game3
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.5Shots per game6
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
5.75Shots on target3
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
13.2%Shot conversion25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
53%Possession36%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
1.34xG for1.46
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
2.01xG against1.47
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Efficient finishingJFK Ventspils: Counter-attacking
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
Accuracy (shots on target)61%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Riga FC II is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Riga FC II · 0.5 pts / game - JFK Ventspils

Riga FC II
LLWD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 2.01BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%
JFK Ventspils
LDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JFK Ventspils is 20% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - Riga FC II · 1.5 goals / game - JFK Ventspils

Riga FC II is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - Riga FC II · 2.25 goals / game - JFK Ventspils

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

JFK Ventspils scoring profile: very strong

JFK Ventspils scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)6
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
8Goals conceded (season)9
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
3.25Average goals per game3.75
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
50%2 goals50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%3 goals25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%4 goals0%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
75%2 goals75%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
25%3 goals50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%4 goals0%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

75%BTTS at half-time25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
25%Scored in both halves50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
75%BTTS - last 575%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Riga FC II · 0.75 pts / game - JFK Ventspils

Riga FC II - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing
JFK Ventspils - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)0.75
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)1
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
2.25Average goals (1st half)1.5
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
25%No goal before half-time50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)1
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
1Average goals (2nd half)2.25
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils
75%No goal after half-time25%
Riga FC IIJFK Ventspils

Riga FC II - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
4
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JFK Ventspils - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Riga FC II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game1.00.3
Goals allowed / game1.30.8
Average goals per game2.31.0
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%25%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal25%75%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 75% - Half-time goals total: 4
JFK Ventspils - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.751.00
Goals scored / game0.51.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.3
Average goals per game1.52.3
1 goal100%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%50%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

JFK Ventspils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

JFK Ventspils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaJFK Ventspils
Average goals per game 3.253.61 3.75
Both teams scored 75%61% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%74% 75%
Clean sheets 0%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%74% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%84% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.61
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / game
1.61
Away goals / game
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Deniss Nazarovs⚽ 1
Nazar Prudchenko⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Mārcis Kazainis⚽ 1
Valters Liepājnieks⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Riga FC IIGoalDeniss Nazarovs
  2. Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
  3. JFK VentspilsGoalValters Liepājnieks
  4. JFK VentspilsGoalMārcis Kazainis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Riga FC II's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against JFK Ventspils. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

JFK Ventspils
2 : 2
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
2 : 2
JFK Ventspils

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs JFK Ventspils?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 4:2 JFK Ventspils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and JFK Ventspils?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, JFK Ventspils won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs JFK Ventspils?

Riga FC II score 1.25 goals per game on average and JFK Ventspils 1.50. The 1. Liga average is 3.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Riga FC II's matches and 75% of JFK Ventspils's.

What form are Riga FC II and JFK Ventspils in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and JFK Ventspils 0-2-2 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs JFK Ventspils?

The statistical background for Riga FC II vs JFK Ventspils — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.