Latvia - 1. LigaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of September 20, 2026

Riga FC II vs Leevon / PPK: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Leevon / PPK crest
Leevon / PPK

Riga FC II vs Leevon / PPK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Riga FC II played against Leevon / PPK in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Riga FC II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Leevon / PPK has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Riga FC II scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.89. Leevon / PPK scores 1.84 and allows 1.16. Games in this league average 3.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Riga FC II's games and 68% of Leevon / PPK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 74%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Leevon / PPK has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.31 per game. Riga FC II takes 8.2 shots per game, while Leevon / PPK takes 13.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Riga FC II leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Leevon / PPK leads at halftime in 26% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Riga FC II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Leevon / PPK, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.72 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Leevon / PPK enter the match as the clearly higher-ranked side: they sit 4th, have recorded 13 wins in 19 matches and won all of their last 5 games, scoring 12 goals in the process. Riga FC II are 8th, have collected just 5 points over their last five league matches and conceded 10 goals, averaging 2 per game. The hosts are offensively dangerous at home, scoring an average of 1.9 goals from 5.9 shots on target, but their defense allows an average of 1.8 goals and an opposition xG of 1.68. Away from home, the visitors concede just 1 goal per match and keep a clean sheet in 56% of their away games, while their average attacking xG stands at 1.67 compared with 1.44 for the hosts. Riga’s home advantage, with the team winning 60% of its home matches, narrows the gap, but their current form and significantly more stable defense point to a Leevon / PPK victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Riga FC II recorded BTTS in 90% of their matches this season and in 80% of their last five fixtures, while their defense kept a clean sheet in only 10% of appearances. Leevon / PPK are in excellent attacking form: they have averaged 2.4 goals and produced an xG of 2.11 across their last five matches, while Riga FC II conceded 2.0 goals per game during the same period. The hosts have a strong case to score, as they average 2.2 goals per match this season with an xG of 1.79, while the visitors allowed opponents an xG of 1.15 in their last five games. The main risk to BTTS is Leevon / PPK's solid defense, which kept a clean sheet in 56% of their matches this season and has conceded just 0.8 goals on average across their last five fixtures. Nevertheless, the combination of the hosts' very weak defense and both teams' high scoring potential gives a slight but clear edge to the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Riga FC II consistently plays in high-scoring matches: Over 1.5 goals landed in 90% of their games, while Over 2.5 goals also landed in 90%. The hosts concede an average of 1.30 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of their appearances, while Leevon / PPK are in excellent form, scoring 12 goals in their last five matches. The visitors are currently generating an average of 2.11 xG, while Riga’s defense has allowed 1.71 xG during this period, strongly supporting at least two goals in the match. However, Leevon / PPK’s defense is more solid, conceding an average of 0.80 goals across their last five fixtures, which is why Over 2.5 carries lower confidence than Over 1.5. The Over 1.5 goals line provides the strongest signal, also compared with the league average of 3.68 goals per match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Leevon / PPK’s current form: the visitors have won all of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.8. Leevon / PPK held the lead at the break in 80% of their last five games, while Riga FC II led at half-time in only 20% and went into the interval trailing in 40%. The difference is also reflected in first-half goal production: the visitors have recently averaged 1.6 goals in the opening periods, compared with 0.6 for the hosts, while Riga have conceded 1.2 goals on average. After the break, Leevon / PPK maintain control, having conceded an average of just 0.2 goals in the second half across their last five appearances. Riga do have a very strong home-season record, with an 80% win rate and an average of 2.2 goals scored, but the visitors’ current form advantage and superiority in the first halves favor a scenario in which Leevon / PPK lead at half-time and go on to win, corresponding to the HT/FT 1/1 selection.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
7Shots6
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
4Shots on target3
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.18xG1.02
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
6Corners5
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
62Dangerous attacks58
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
19Fouls14
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
0Cards0
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.47Goals scored / game1.84
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.89Goals allowed / game1.16
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
47%Average possession53%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
4.21Shots on target / game5.58
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.16Shots per game13.16
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
4.21Shots on target5.58
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
18.1%Shot conversion14%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
47%Possession53%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.31xG for1.73
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.7xG against1.39
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingLeevon / PPK: Efficient finishing
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
Accuracy (shots on target)52%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Leevon / PPK is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Riga FC II · 3 pts / game - Leevon / PPK

Riga FC II
DLLDW
Season result split
37% W16% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-9
1.26 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Leevon / PPK
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
68% W16% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-3-3
2.21 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leevon / PPK is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.47 goals / game - Riga FC II · 1.84 goals / game - Leevon / PPK

Leevon / PPK is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.89 goals / game - Riga FC II · 1.16 goals / game - Leevon / PPK

Riga FC II scoring profile: strong

Riga FC II scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 games), while Leevon / PPK keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).

Leevon / PPK scoring profile: very strong

Leevon / PPK scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 games), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 games).

28Goals scored (season)35
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
36Goals conceded (season)22
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
3.37Average goals per game3
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
7Goals scored (last 5)12
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal84%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
53%2 goals63%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
16%3 goals26%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
5%4 goals11%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal68%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
68%2 goals32%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
26%3 goals11%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
5%4 goals5%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

37%BTTS at half-time42%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
37%Scored in both halves42%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS68%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
80%BTTS - last 560%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II - half-time state
32% leading37% draw32% trailing
Leevon / PPK - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per game (1st half)1.32
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.84
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.58Average goals (1st half)1.68
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
37%Clean sheet before half-time37%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
42%No goal before half-time47%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per game (2nd half)2.05
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)1
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.32
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
42%Clean sheet after half-time74%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK
47%No goal after half-time26%
Riga FC IILeevon / PPK

Riga FC II - second-half results

32% W21% D47% L
25
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Leevon / PPK - second-half results

58% W32% D11% L
25
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding262%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Riga FC II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Leevon / PPK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.602.20
Goals scored / game1.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game2.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
4
1
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Leevon / PPK
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
4
31-45
7
0
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.18
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Leevon / PPK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaLeevon / PPK
Average goals per game 3.373.72 3.00
Both teams scored 63%64% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%72% 74%
Clean sheets 11%20% 32%
Goal before half-time 84%77% 74%
Goal after half-time 84%84% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.72
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.07
Home goals / game
1.65
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Riga FC II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Leevon / PPK. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Leevon / PPK
3 : 2
Riga FC II
FS Leevon / FK PPK
0 : 3
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
1 : 2
FS Leevon / FK PPK

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs Leevon / PPK?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 1:1 Leevon / PPK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Leevon / PPK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 1, Leevon / PPK won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Leevon / PPK?

Riga FC II score 1.47 goals per game on average and Leevon / PPK 1.84. The 1. Liga average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Riga FC II's matches and 68% of Leevon / PPK's.

What form are Riga FC II and Leevon / PPK in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Leevon / PPK 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Leevon / PPK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Riga FC II vs Leevon / PPK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.