Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Riga FC II vs Mārupe: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
0 : 4half-time 0:0
Mārupe crest
Mārupe

Riga FC II vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga FC II play Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Riga FC II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Mārupe: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga FC II scores 1.62 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Mārupe scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga FC II 62%, Mārupe 46%. Over 2.5: Riga FC II 69%, Mārupe 77%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Mārupe has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.36. Riga FC II: 8.2 shots per match, Mārupe: 9.5.

Match halves

Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69. Mārupe: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.31.

Goals by minute

Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). Mārupe: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Riga FC II has a clear offensive edge at home — scoring an average of 2.33 goals per match at their stadium, registering 12 shots with 8.33 on target and converting 19% of chances, while Mārupe scores just 1.0 goals away, averaging only 4.5 shots on target and 11% conversion. Defensively the hosts are vulnerable however — conceding 2.0 goals per home match with average xG against of 1.86, whereas the visitors concede only 0.75 goals on average away and record 50% clean sheets. The last five matches show similar points output (1.4 points per game each), but Riga have scored 10 goals in their last 5 compared to Mārupe’s 6, with the hosts also conceding 10 in those five. The xG differential also favors the hosts: 1.7 xG at home versus 1.34 xG for the visitors on the road, suggesting higher quality of created chances for Riga, although Mārupe compensates with solid defending. As a result I forecast a home win, but with clear risk posed by the visitors’ compact defence, so I assess probabilities at approximately 55% for the hosts, 25% for a draw and 20% for the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 4
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Riga FC IIMārupe
4Shots19
Riga FC IIMārupe
0Shots on target10
Riga FC IIMārupe
0.54xG2.66
Riga FC IIMārupe
3Corners8
Riga FC IIMārupe
38Dangerous attacks107
Riga FC IIMārupe
14Fouls10
Riga FC IIMārupe
0Cards0
Riga FC IIMārupe

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.62Goals scored / match1.69
Riga FC IIMārupe
1.77Goals conceded / match1.46
Riga FC IIMārupe
45%Average possession49%
Riga FC IIMārupe
4.62Shots on target / match4.31
Riga FC IIMārupe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.23Shots per match9.54
Riga FC IIMārupe
4.62Shots on target4.31
Riga FC IIMārupe
19.6%Shot conversion17.7%
Riga FC IIMārupe
45%Possession49%
Riga FC IIMārupe
1.36xG for1.46
Riga FC IIMārupe
1.68xG against1.18
Riga FC IIMārupe

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingMārupe: Efficient finishing
Riga FC IIMārupe
Accuracy (shots on target)56%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 300% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.6 pts / match - Mārupe

Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mārupe
LLLWL
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mārupe is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II · 1.46 goals / match - Mārupe

Riga FC II scoring profile: strong

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

Mārupe scoring profile: very strong

Mārupe scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

21Goals scored (season)22
Riga FC IIMārupe
23Goals conceded (season)19
Riga FC IIMārupe
3.38Average goals in match3.15
Riga FC IIMārupe
10Goals scored (last 5)4
Riga FC IIMārupe
4Goals conceded (last 5)13
Riga FC IIMārupe

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal77%
Riga FC IIMārupe
62%2 goals46%
Riga FC IIMārupe
15%3 goals23%
Riga FC IIMārupe
8%4 goals23%
Riga FC IIMārupe

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal62%
Riga FC IIMārupe
62%2 goals46%
Riga FC IIMārupe
23%3 goals23%
Riga FC IIMārupe
8%4 goals15%
Riga FC IIMārupe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time8%
Riga FC IIMārupe
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Riga FC IIMārupe
38%Scored in both halves15%
Riga FC IIMārupe

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
Riga FC IIMārupe
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS31%
Riga FC IIMārupe
60%BTTS - last 560%
Riga FC IIMārupe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Riga FC IIMārupe
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Riga FC IIMārupe
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Riga FC IIMārupe

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Riga FC IIMārupe
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Riga FC IIMārupe
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time54%
Riga FC IIMārupe

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II · 1.08 pts / match - Mārupe

Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
Mārupe - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)1.08
Riga FC IIMārupe
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Riga FC IIMārupe
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Riga FC IIMārupe
1.54Average goals (1st half)0.92
Riga FC IIMārupe
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Riga FC IIMārupe
38%No goal before half-time69%
Riga FC IIMārupe

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.31
Riga FC IIMārupe
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)1.31
Riga FC IIMārupe
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Riga FC IIMārupe
1.85Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Riga FC IIMārupe
46%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Riga FC IIMārupe
46%No goal after half-time38%
Riga FC IIMārupe

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mārupe - second-half results

38% W15% R46% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mārupe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
5
3
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaMārupe
Average goals in match 3.383.43 3.15
Both teams scored 62%60% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 77%
Clean sheets 15%23% 38%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 69%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Riga FC II 1 - 0 - 1 Mārupe. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Riga FC II
1 : 0
FK Mārupe
FK Mārupe
2 : 0
Riga FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs Mārupe?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 0:4 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Mārupe?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 1, Mārupe won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Mārupe?

Riga FC II score 1.62 goals per game on average and Mārupe 1.69. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Riga FC II's matches and 46% of Mārupe's.

What form are Riga FC II and Mārupe in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Mārupe 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Mārupe?

The statistical background for Riga FC II vs Mārupe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.