Riga FC II vs Skanste: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Riga FC II vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Riga FC II plays Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game is scheduled for September 7, 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs.
Recent form
Riga FC II has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Skanste has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Riga FC II scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 1.89. Skanste scores 2.06 and allows 1.94. Games in this league average 3.67 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Riga FC II's games and 61% of Skanste's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 72%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Skanste has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.29 per game. Riga FC II takes 8.1 shots per game, while Skanste takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Riga FC II leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Skanste leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Riga FC II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Skanste, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.67 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Riga FC II | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 51% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Skanste is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Riga FC II · 2 pts / game - Skanste
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Skanste is 48% better for: goals scored per game.
1.39 goals / game - Riga FC II · 2.06 goals / game - Skanste
Riga FC II scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
Skanste scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Riga FC II
Over / Under - Skanste
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga FC II is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Riga FC II · 1 pts / game - Skanste
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga FC II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Skanste - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 3.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Riga FC II
Skanste
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Riga FC II | Liga | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.28 | 3.67 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▼ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 20% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Riga FC II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Skanste. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
When do Riga FC II and Skanste play?
Riga FC II face Skanste on September 7, 2026 in 1. Liga at Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Skanste?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, Skanste won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Skanste?
Riga FC II score 1.39 goals per game on average and Skanste 2.06. The 1. Liga average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Riga FC II's matches and 61% of Skanste's.
What form are Riga FC II and Skanste in?
Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Skanste 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Skanste?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.