Latvia - 1. LigaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of October 23, 2026

Riga FC II vs Skanste: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
3 : 2half-time 1:1
Skanste crest
Skanste

Riga FC II vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Riga FC II played against Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 7, 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

Riga FC II has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Skanste has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Riga FC II scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 1.89. Skanste scores 2.06 and allows 1.94. Games in this league average 3.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 61% of Riga FC II's games and 61% of Skanste's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 72%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Skanste has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.29 per game. Riga FC II takes 8.1 shots per game, while Skanste takes 10.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Riga FC II leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Skanste leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Riga FC II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Skanste, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.67 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Skanste arrive in clearly better form: they have collected 10 points from their last 5 matches, winning 3 times and scoring as many as 17 goals, while Riga FC II have managed just 2 points and 4 goals. However, the hosts are more solid at home, where they win 56% of their matches and average 1.78 goals, with 1.44 xG. The key factor is Riga FC II’s defensive crisis during their current run: they have conceded 11 goals in 5 matches, while Skanste regularly convert their chances. Both defenses allow opponents high-quality opportunities, with average xG against of 1.72 for the hosts and 1.82 for the visitors, but Skanste’s current efficiency points to an away win. The risk stems from the visitors’ very poor away record, having lost 63% of their matches on the road, but their current form gives them the edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Skanste have recorded BTTS in 75% of their matches this season, while both teams scored in 100% of their last five games—an extremely strong signal that the opposition is likely to find the net. The visitors have recently averaged 3.4 goals, whereas Riga FC II have conceded 2.2 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in only 20% of their games throughout the season. Although Riga FC II have scored just 0.8 goals across their last five appearances, Skanste’s defense has failed to keep a single clean sheet this season and concedes an average of 2.38 goals. The hosts’ attacking potential is further confirmed by an average xG of 1.66 and 6.33 shots on target per match, while Skanste allow opponents an xG of 1.82. Both sides also have high rates of matches featuring at least three goals—70% and 75%, respectively—so an open game with goals at both ends is the more likely scenario. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams exceeded the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their league matches, providing a very strong case for an open game. Skanste averages 1.75 goals per match, while Riga FC II concedes 1.60; additionally, the visitors have scored as many as 17 goals in their last 5 appearances, averaging 3.4 per game. Skanste’s defense has kept no clean sheets and concedes an average of 2.38 goals, so the hosts should have a realistic chance of scoring despite averaging only 0.8 goals across their last five matches. The combined xG averages of both sides point to approximately 3.35 goals, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 70% of Riga’s matches and 75% of Skanste’s. However, the safest edge is on Over 1.5, as the season data for both teams contains not a single match ending with a maximum of one goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Skanste leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle: in their last five matches, the visitors were ahead after 45 minutes in 60% of games, while Riga FC II were trailing at that stage in 60%. During this period, Skanste averaged 2.2 goals before half-time, compared with just 0.4 for the hosts, clearly increasing the likelihood of an early advantage for the visitors. The full-time results also favor the away side: they won 60% of their last five matches and averaged 2.0 points per game, compared with no wins and 0.4 points for Riga FC II. The hosts have stronger full-season home statistics, but their recent average of 0.8 goals scored and 2.2 conceded indicates a clear decline in form. The 2/2 scenario is also supported by the second half, in which Skanste averaged 1.2 goals scored and conceded just 0.4 over their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Riga FC IISkanste
9Shots8
Riga FC IISkanste
5Shots on target7
Riga FC IISkanste
1.46xG1.42
Riga FC IISkanste
2Corners2
Riga FC IISkanste
75Dangerous attacks59
Riga FC IISkanste
9Fouls8
Riga FC IISkanste
0Cards0
Riga FC IISkanste

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Riga FC IISkanste
1.39Goals scored / game2.06
Riga FC IISkanste
1.89Goals allowed / game1.94
Riga FC IISkanste
47%Average possession41%
Riga FC IISkanste
4.17Shots on target / game4.83
Riga FC IISkanste

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.11Shots per game10.67
Riga FC IISkanste
4.17Shots on target4.83
Riga FC IISkanste
17.1%Shot conversion19.3%
Riga FC IISkanste
47%Possession41%
Riga FC IISkanste
1.29xG for1.57
Riga FC IISkanste
1.72xG against1.76
Riga FC IISkanste

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingSkanste: Counter-attacking
Riga FC IISkanste
Accuracy (shots on target)51%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Skanste is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / game - Riga FC II · 2 pts / game - Skanste

Riga FC II
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-9
1.17 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Skanste
LWWDW
Season result split
39% W11% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-9
1.28 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Skanste is 48% better for: goals scored per game.

1.39 goals / game - Riga FC II · 2.06 goals / game - Skanste

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 games).

Skanste scoring profile: very strong

Skanste scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 games).

25Goals scored (season)37
Riga FC IISkanste
34Goals conceded (season)35
Riga FC IISkanste
3.28Average goals per game4
Riga FC IISkanste
4Goals scored (last 5)17
Riga FC IISkanste
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Riga FC IISkanste

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal72%
Riga FC IISkanste
50%2 goals39%
Riga FC IISkanste
11%3 goals33%
Riga FC IISkanste
6%4 goals33%
Riga FC IISkanste

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal89%
Riga FC IISkanste
67%2 goals67%
Riga FC IISkanste
28%3 goals28%
Riga FC IISkanste
6%4 goals11%
Riga FC IISkanste

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Riga FC IISkanste
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Riga FC IISkanste
33%Scored in both halves22%
Riga FC IISkanste

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Riga FC IISkanste
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Riga FC IISkanste
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Riga FC IISkanste

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Riga FC IISkanste
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Riga FC IISkanste

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Riga FC IISkanste
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time39%
Riga FC IISkanste

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Riga FC II · 1 pts / game - Skanste

Riga FC II - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Skanste - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1
Riga FC IISkanste
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Riga FC IISkanste
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Riga FC IISkanste
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.78
Riga FC IISkanste
39%Clean sheet before half-time22%
Riga FC IISkanste
44%No goal before half-time61%
Riga FC IISkanste

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per game (2nd half)1.39
Riga FC IISkanste
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)1
Riga FC IISkanste
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Riga FC IISkanste
1.72Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Riga FC IISkanste
44%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste
50%No goal after half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste

Riga FC II - second-half results

28% W22% D50% L
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Skanste - second-half results

39% W22% D39% L
18
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Riga FC II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Skanste - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.00
Goals scored / game2.21.2
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game3.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+5+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 11

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
3
1
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
3
8
16-30
6
9
31-45
12
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.64
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.72
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaSkanste
Average goals per game▼ 3.283.67▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▼ 61%64%▼ 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 67%70%▲ 72%
Clean sheets▼ 11%20%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%77%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%85%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.67
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / game
1.67
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Daniils Putrāns⚽ 1
—Markuss Eduards Blaubergs⚽ 1
—Nils Voitiskis⚽ 1
—Toms SarmaA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Riga FC IIGoalDaniils PutrānsAssist: Toms Sarma
  2. Riga FC IIGoalMarkuss Eduards Blaubergs
  3. Riga FC IIGoalNils Voitiskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Riga FC II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Skanste. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Skanste
2 : 0
Riga FC II
Skanstes SK
1 : 0
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
0 : 1
Skanstes SK

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs Skanste?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 3:2 Skanste. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Skanste?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, Skanste won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Skanste?

Riga FC II score 1.39 goals per game on average and Skanste 2.06. The 1. Liga average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Riga FC II's matches and 61% of Skanste's.

What form are Riga FC II and Skanste in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Skanste 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Skanste?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.