Riga vs FS Jelgava: match statistics
Riga vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Riga played against FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 16, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Riga has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. FS Jelgava has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Riga scores 3.33 goals per game and allows 1.17. FS Jelgava scores 0.67 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.06 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Riga's games and 33% of FS Jelgava's. The Over 2.5 rates are 92% and 33%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Riga has the higher season xG average, 2.02 to 1.25 per game. Riga takes 16.5 shots per game, while FS Jelgava takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Riga leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 1.75 goals per game after halftime. FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Riga's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For FS Jelgava, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 3.06 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Riga has a significant offensive advantage at home — averaging 3.2 goals per match, xG 2.23, 6.4 shots on target per game and 17% conversion with 64% possession. In the last 5 matches Riga scored 15 goals and averaged 2.6 points per game, while FS Jelgava scored 4 goals and has 1.4 points per game in the same period. Defensively the hosts also perform better: opponents generate on average 0.76 xG against Riga at their ground, whereas Jelgava concede 1.61 xG on the road and lose on average 1.33 goals per game. Additionally Riga have not had a goalless home match (0% matches without a goal) and have an 80% win rate at home, while Jelgava win only 17% of away games and fail to score in 50% of away matches; therefore I assess probabilities at 75% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 10% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes and estimate its probability at 63%, because league-wide BTTS occurs in 57% of matches and Riga have had BTTS in 60% of their last 5 games. Although both teams’ season-long BTTS rates are low (33% each), the hosts’ recent form and weak defense favor both teams scoring. Riga concede on average 2.33 goals per home match this season (xG against 1.52), while in their last 5 matches they’ve averaged 3.0 goals scored per game (15 goals, xG 1.93), indicating high attacking volume and goal-scoring dynamics from the hosts. FS Jelgava have a season scoring average of 0.5 goals (0.8 in the last 5), but their away xG is 1.31 and despite a low shot conversion of 5% they create chances, so against Riga’s vulnerable defense the visitors have a realistic chance to score. Combined: league BTTS 57%, Riga conceding 2.33 at home and hosts’ 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches lead me to pick Yes (63%) over No (37%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Riga has averaged 3.0 goals (15 goals) in their last 5 matches with xG 1.93, while FS Jelgava have 0.8 goals in their last 5 (4 goals) and xG 1.23. The hosts average 3.0 shots on target with a 9% conversion rate, the visitors 2.67 shots on target with a 5% conversion rate, indicating superior attacking efficiency for Riga. Defensively Riga conceded 0.86 xG in the last 5, and Jelgava conceded 1.36; combining these values yields expected goals of 1.80 for the home side and 0.95 for the visitors, a total of 2.75. The league averages 3.0 goals per game, and Riga had 80% of their last 5 matches over 2.5 goals, which further supports a higher-scoring match scenario. A Poisson model with a total expected goals of 2.75 gives approximately a 76% probability for Over 1.5, 52% for Over 2.5 and 31% for Over 3.5, therefore I recommend the Over at line 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (40%), because Riga led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and in those games averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.4 for FS Jelgava. Although season-long the hosts led at the break in only 17% of matches, the last 5 show a clear improvement and Riga won 80% of those five fixtures. The hosts also have a higher shot conversion rate (9% vs 5%) and similar xG (1.19 for Riga vs 1.31 for Jelgava), which combined with better conversion and form favors scoring and maintaining a lead. Over the season Riga concedes an average of 2.33 goals per game, but in the last 5 matches they concede 1.0 per game on average, reducing the risk of a turnaround by the visitors after half-time; therefore 1/X received a lower but meaningful weight (20%), and the remaining outcomes were allocated as less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Riga | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Riga is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Riga · 1.4 pts / game - FS Jelgava
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 397% better for: goals scored per game.
3.33 goals / game - Riga · 0.67 goals / game - FS Jelgava
Riga is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - Riga · 1.83 goals / game - FS Jelgava
Riga scores in 100% of games (12 of 12 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
FS Jelgava scores in 50% of games (6 of 12 meczów), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Riga
Over / Under - FS Jelgava
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.17 pts / game - Riga · 1.17 pts / game - FS Jelgava
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 75%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Riga
FS Jelgava
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Riga | Liga | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.50 | 3.06 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 92% | 53% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 85% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Riga's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FS Jelgava. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Riga vs FS Jelgava?
The Virsliga match finished Riga 2:2 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Riga and FS Jelgava?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 4, FS Jelgava won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs FS Jelgava?
Riga score 3.33 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.67. The Virsliga average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Riga's matches and 33% of FS Jelgava's.
What form are Riga and FS Jelgava in?
Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and FS Jelgava 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs FS Jelgava?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


