Rīgas FS II vs JFK Ventspils: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs JFK Ventspils: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rīgas FS II played against JFK Ventspils in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. JFK Ventspils has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Rīgas FS II scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 2.78. JFK Ventspils scores 1.12 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 3.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Rīgas FS II's games and 65% of JFK Ventspils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 78% and 53%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rīgas FS II has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.30 per game. Rīgas FS II takes 10.0 shots per game, while JFK Ventspils takes 6.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. JFK Ventspils leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.47 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rīgas FS II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For JFK Ventspils, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.66 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS II have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding as many as 23 goals during that run—an average of 4.6 per game—which significantly undermines confidence in their defensive solidity. JFK Ventspils have also failed to win any of their last five matches, but they allowed opponents just 9 goals, while the hosts conceded more than twice as many. Away from home, Ventspils average 1.75 goals scored compared with Rīgas FS II’s 1.44 goals at home, while their average expected goals against stands at 1.34 versus 1.87 conceded by the hosts. Ventspils lose only 38% of their away matches, compared with Rīgas FS II’s 56% home defeat rate, so despite the genuine risk of a draw, the visitors should be given the edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for both teams to score is Rīgas FS II’s disastrous recent defensive record: the hosts have conceded 23 goals in 5 matches, averaging 4.6, while their opponents created chances worth 2.11 xG during this period. JFK Ventspils have failed to keep a clean sheet in 87% of matches and concede an average of 1.88 goals per game, giving the hosts a realistic route to improve on their poor seasonal average of 0.56 goals. The trend is clearly pro-BTTS, as Rīgas FS II have seen both teams score in 5 of their last 5 matches, while the figure for Ventspils is 4 of 5. The visitors should respond, especially since they have averaged 1.75 goals throughout the season and have not once finished a match without scoring. The only risk to the pick is Ventspils’ average of 0.8 goals across their last five appearances; however, the hosts’ very poor defensive quality clearly limits the significance of this signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Rīgas FS II have averaged 1.8 goals scored in their last 5 matches, but, more importantly, they have conceded as many as 4.6 goals per game, which clearly increases the visitors’ attacking potential. JFK Ventspils have scored in 100% of their matches this season, while the hosts have allowed their opponents to score at least once in 89% of games. Over 2.5 goals was landed in 100% of the hosts’ last five matches, with both teams scoring in each of those games; the average xG against Rīgas FS II is also 2.11. The Over 1.5 line is further supported by the strongest seasonal trends: it was exceeded in all JFK Ventspils matches and in 67% of the hosts’ games, making the expected total of 3.20 goals a clear advantage.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JFK Ventspils hold a clear advantage before the break: they were leading at half-time in 63% of their matches, while Rīgas FS II have never led and were trailing at half-time in 44% of games. The visitors average 1.00 goal in the first half, while the hosts concede 0.78, with Rīgas FS II’s recent form particularly alarming — they conceded as many as 2.8 goals per match before the break in their last five outings. Over the full match, Ventspils average 1.75 goals compared with just 0.56 for Rīgas FS II, while the visitors’ shot conversion rate stands at 20%, against 8% for the hosts. Rīgas FS II have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 4.6 goals in those games, making the most likely scenario an HT/FT 1/1 outcome, with Ventspils taking the lead at the break and holding on to it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rīgas FS II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 0.4 pts / game - JFK Ventspils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS II is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
1.39 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.12 goals / game - JFK Ventspils
JFK Ventspils is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.78 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.71 goals / game - JFK Ventspils
Rīgas FS II scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 games).
JFK Ventspils scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 games), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
Over / Under - JFK Ventspils
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS II is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.24 pts / game - JFK Ventspils
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JFK Ventspils - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 12%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 3.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -9 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rīgas FS II
JFK Ventspils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.17 | 3.66 | ▼ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 65% | • 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 78% | 70% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 20% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 77% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 84% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Rīgas FS IIGoalRems Gastons Dzeguze
- Rīgas FS IIGoalAleksejs Bukovskis
- Rīgas FS IIGoalVictor Uchechukwu Osuagwu
Head-to-head
Record from Rīgas FS II's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against JFK Ventspils. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs JFK Ventspils?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 4:1 JFK Ventspils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS II and JFK Ventspils?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS II won 1, JFK Ventspils won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs JFK Ventspils?
Rīgas FS II score 1.39 goals per game on average and JFK Ventspils 1.12. The 1. Liga average is 3.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 65% of JFK Ventspils's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and JFK Ventspils in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and JFK Ventspils 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs JFK Ventspils?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rīgas FS II vs JFK Ventspils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


