Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of September 06, 2026

Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II: match statistics

Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II
1 : 3half-time 1:1
Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II

Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS II played against Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

Rīgas FS II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Riga FC II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS II scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 2.10. Riga FC II scores 1.40 and allows 2.10. Games in this league average 3.47 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Rīgas FS II's games and 60% of Riga FC II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 70%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Riga FC II has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.29 per game. Rīgas FS II takes 9.2 shots per game, while Riga FC II takes 8.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Riga FC II leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS II's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Riga FC II, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.47 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS II appear to be the favorites: in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 9 goals and won 3 of 5 games, while Riga FC II have scored 5 goals and won only 1; the hosts’ points average in this period is 2.0 per game versus 0.6 per game for the visitors. At home Rīgas FS II average 1.67 goals per match, register 9.67 shots of which 4.17 are on target and have a conversion rate of 17%, whereas the visitors on the road average 1.0 goal, 7.5 shots and 3.5 on target with a 13% conversion. The home xG is 1.38 versus 1.09 xG for the visitors away, which together with a higher number and quality of shots indicates the hosts create better chances; both defenses are vulnerable however, as the hosts concede an average of 2.33 goals per home match and the visitors 2.2 on the road. Riga FC II’s away metrics are worrying: 0% away wins, 80% losses and 0% clean sheets, while the hosts at home have 33% wins and 17% of matches without conceding. Considering the hosts’ 9 goals in the last 5 matches, better conversion (17% vs 13%) and the visitors’ significantly poorer away form, I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 60% (Rīgas FS II 60% and Riga FC II 60%), against a league average of 61%, which is a strong indicator for BTTS - Yes. Rīgas FS II averages 1.8 goals per game with xG 1.55 and concedes 2.0 goals on the season (1.2 in the last 5), while Riga FC II scores 1.0 goals per game with xG 1.09 and concedes 2.2 goals both on the season and in the last 5, so both defenses are vulnerable. The home side averages 6.6 shots on target and 10.8 total shots, the visitors 3.5 on target and 7.5 total; in the last 5 matches the home team scored 9 and conceded 6, the visitors scored 5 and conceded 11, which suggests that while Rīgas creates more chances, the opponents also have scoring opportunities. Additionally, 80% of home matches finish over 2.5 goals and both teams have 60% of matches with Over 2.5 and BTTS 60%, therefore I give the pick "BTTS - Yes" with moderate confidence 65% for and 35% against.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistics strongly favor goals: the home side averages 1.8 goals/match, the away team 1.0, with xG of 1.55 (home) and 1.09 (away), yielding estimated 1.70 expected goals for the hosts and 1.45 for the visitors (total 3.15). Seasonal metrics show both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals, the home team records Over 2.5 in 80% of games, the away team in 60%, and the league averages 3.46 goals per match. The hosts average 10.8 shots and 6.6 on target with a 17% conversion rate, while the visitors average 7.5/3.5 with a 13% conversion, supporting the likelihood of multiple strikes. Given the expected 3.15 goals and historical over-2.5 percentages (80% vs 60%), I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at 98% and Over 2.5 at approximately 72%. Over 3.5 is less certain: seasonal Over 3.5 is 60% (home) vs 40% (away), but the estimated 3.15 goals is below 3.5, so I assign Over 3.5 ~46%. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Rīgas FS II leads at the break in 60% of matches and scores an average of 1.4 goals before half-time while conceding only 0.4 (leadingAtHTPercentage_home=60, scoredAVGHT_home=1.4, concededAVGHT_home=0.4), so there is a high probability of the home side holding a lead after 45 minutes. The hosts win 60% of matches versus 0% for the visitors (winPercentage_home=60, winPercentage_away=0), have a higher xG (1.55 vs 1.09) and more shots on target (6.6 vs 3.5), therefore I assign the largest weight to the 1/1 scenario (42%). On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 1.6 goals in the second half while the visitors score 0.6 after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_home=1.6, scored_2hg_avg_away=0.6), which justifies accounting for full-time draws (1/X=12%, X/X=15%). In the last 5 matches the hosts have 3 wins (60% in last 5) versus 1 win for the visitors (20%), further reinforcing the 1/1 scenario as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
-1Shots-1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
-1Shots on target-1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0xG0
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
-1Corners-1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0Dangerous attacks0
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
-1Fouls-1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
-1Cards-1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
1.4Goals scored / game1.4
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
2.1Goals allowed / game2.1
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
46%Average possession46%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
3.7Shots on target / game4.6
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.2Shots per game8.3
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
3.7Shots on target4.6
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
15.2%Shot conversion16.9%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
46%Possession46%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
1.29xG for1.35
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
1.78xG against1.82
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS II: Counter-attackingRiga FC II: Counter-attacking
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)40%55%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rīgas FS II is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 0.6 pts / game - Riga FC II

Rīgas FS II
DLWWW
Season result split
30% W20% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-5
1.10 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Riga FC II
LLLLW
Season result split
30% W10% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)14
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
21Goals conceded (season)21
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
3.5Average goals per game3.5
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
9Goals scored (last 5)5
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal70%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
40%2 goals50%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
30%3 goals10%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
10%4 goals10%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal90%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
60%2 goals80%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
40%3 goals30%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
20%4 goals10%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time30%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
40%Scored in both halves40%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
40%BTTS - last 540%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time30%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS II is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.9 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.5 pts / game - Riga FC II

Rīgas FS II - half-time state
50% leading40% draw10% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.9Points per game (1st half)1.5
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
80%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
40%No goal before half-time40%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.8
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
1.9Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
2.5Average goals (2nd half)2
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
30%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II
60%No goal after half-time50%
Rīgas FS IIRiga FC II

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

30% W10% R60% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 30%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.7

Allows 1.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Riga FC II - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 30%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.9

Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Rīgas FS II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Riga FC II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.22.0
Average goals per game0.62.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
2
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FS IILigaRiga FC II
Average goals per game 3.503.47 3.50
Both teams scored 50%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%69% 70%
Clean sheets 20%23% 10%
Goal before half-time 70%70% 80%
Goal after half-time 90%83% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.47
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.96
Home goals / game
1.51
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
37%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Nazar Prudchenko⚽ 2

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
  2. Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS II's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Riga FC II. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
1 : 0
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
2 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II?

The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:3 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS II and Riga FC II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS II won 1, Riga FC II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II?

Rīgas FS II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.40. The 1. Liga average is 3.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 60% of Riga FC II's.

What form are Rīgas FS II and Riga FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Riga FC II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.