Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rīgas FS II played against Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on July 5, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Rīgas FS II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Super Nova II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Rīgas FS II scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 2.18. Super Nova II scores 1.64 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 3.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Rīgas FS II's games and 64% of Super Nova II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 82% and 45%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Super Nova II has the higher season xG average, 1.30 to 1.29 per game. Rīgas FS II takes 8.3 shots per game, while Super Nova II takes 8.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova II leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.91 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rīgas FS II's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Super Nova II, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.48 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win. Super Nova II sit 6th versus Rīgas FS II in 10th and have scored 18 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 15, with away goals per game 1.75 vs hosts’ 1.57. In the last five matches the visitors average 2.0 points per game and have scored 9 goals, while the hosts average 1.8 points per game and have scored 10; concurrently the hosts concede 2.43 goals per home game versus the visitors’ 2.25 concessions on the road. Super Nova’s edge is confirmed by more shots on target (5.25 vs 4.17), a higher shots average (11 vs 9.67) and superior expected goals xG 1.48 vs 1.38, and additionally the visitors have not had an away match without scoring (0% such games) versus 14% of the hosts’ matches being goalless for them. Although the combined goals average for both teams is 4.0, the quality metrics and consistency in scoring favor a slight advantage to the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal BTTS rate is 57% for Rīgas FS II and 75% for Super Nova II, with the league average at 62%, providing a strong signal that both teams regularly score and concede. Both sides average over 1.5 goals per match (home 1.57, away 1.75), with seasonal goals conceded of 1.00 and 2.25 respectively, so the visitors are particularly prone to conceding. In the last 5 matches the home team had BTTS in 60% of games and the visitors in 40%, with average goals 2.0 (home) and 1.8 (away) and goals conceded 1.8 and 1.6, indicating that in recent form both teams exchange goals. Additionally xG and shots on target favor the away side (xG_for 1.48 vs 1.18 and 5.25 SoT vs 3.5), which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams; therefore I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 66%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (average attacking xG and defensive xG conceded) yields 1.57 xG for Rīgas FS II ((1.18 + 1.96)/2) and 1.50 xG for Super Nova II ((1.48 + 1.52)/2), totaling 3.07 expected goals. With a Poisson distribution at mean 3.07 we get P(0)=4.6% and P(1)=14.3%, so the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 81%; Over 2.5 is ~59%, and Over 3.5 ~37%. Seasonal figures corroborate a goal-prone trend: the league averages 3.51 goals/match, hosts score 1.57 goals/match on the season and averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, with the hosts’ last 5 fixtures producing 100% Over 2.5 outcomes. Additionally, BTTS for the away team is 75% on the season and overall league BTTS is 62%, which increases the chance of at least two goals. Based on the above data the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (over, line 1.5) with an edge of approximately 81%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Rīgas FS II led at half-time in 4 matches (leadingAtHT_home = 4.0, 57%) and average 1.0 goal by half with only 0.29 conceded (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.0, concededAVGHT_home = 0.29), while Super Nova II average 0.25 goals by half and concede 1.25 (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.25, concededAVGHT_away = 1.25). The home side also has a superior full-match record: 57.0% wins and 1.86 season points per game at home (winPercentage_home = 57.0, seasonPPG_home = 1.86) versus 25.0% wins and 1.25 points away (winPercentage_away = 25.0, seasonPPG_away = 1.25). Conversely, the visitors are dangerous after the break — AVG_2hg_away = 2.5 and an average 1.5 goals in second halves (scored_2hg_avg_away = 1.5) with over05_2hg_percentage_away = 100.0%, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround. Considering the hosts’ dominance at half-time (57% HT leads) and their advantage in final results, the safest scenario is 1/1 (home leading at half and winning by full-time), hence the pick 1/1 with an estimated probability of ~40%, with a clear but smaller risk of a draw or an away comeback in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Super Nova II is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 2 pts / game - Super Nova II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Super Nova II is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.36 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.64 goals / game - Super Nova II
Super Nova II is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.18 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.45 goals / game - Super Nova II
Rīgas FS II scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 meczów), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).
Super Nova II scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 meczów), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
Over / Under - Super Nova II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rīgas FS II
Super Nova II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.55 | 3.48 | ▼ 3.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 68% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 22% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 85% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Rīgas FS IIGoalRems Gastons Dzeguze
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
Rīgas FS II score 1.36 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.64. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 64% of Super Nova II's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and Super Nova II in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Super Nova II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


