Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rīgas FS II play Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 5 July 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Rīgas FS II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Super Nova II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS II scores 1.33 and concedes 2.08 goals per match. Super Nova II scores 1.58 and concedes 1.42. League average: 3.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS II 58%, Super Nova II 67%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS II 75%, Super Nova II 42%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS II has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.26. Rīgas FS II: 9.2 shots per match, Super Nova II: 8.5.
Match halves
Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.58. Super Nova II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.48 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back an away win. Super Nova II sit 6th versus Rīgas FS II in 10th and have scored 18 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 15, with away goals per game 1.75 vs hosts’ 1.57. In the last five matches the visitors average 2.0 points per game and have scored 9 goals, while the hosts average 1.8 points per game and have scored 10; concurrently the hosts concede 2.43 goals per home game versus the visitors’ 2.25 concessions on the road. Super Nova’s edge is confirmed by more shots on target (5.25 vs 4.17), a higher shots average (11 vs 9.67) and superior expected goals xG 1.48 vs 1.38, and additionally the visitors have not had an away match without scoring (0% such games) versus 14% of the hosts’ matches being goalless for them. Although the combined goals average for both teams is 4.0, the quality metrics and consistency in scoring favour a slight advantage to the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS II is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.6 pts / match - Super Nova II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Super Nova II is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.58 goals / match - Super Nova II
Super Nova II is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.08 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.42 goals / match - Super Nova II
Rīgas FS II scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Super Nova II scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rīgas FS II
Over / Under — Super Nova II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS II
Super Nova II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.42 | 3.48 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 22% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
Rīgas FS II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.58. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 67% of Super Nova II's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and Super Nova II in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.