Latvia - VirsligaRTU stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Rīgas FS vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
3 : 1half-time 1:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils

Rīgas FS vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS played against BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on June 30, 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Rīgas FS has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. BFC Daugavpils has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 0.70. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.05 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Rīgas FS's games and 55% of BFC Daugavpils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 35%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 2.04 to 1.53 per game. Rīgas FS takes 16.8 shots per game, while BFC Daugavpils takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 55% of its games and scores 1.35 goals per game after halftime. BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.70 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For BFC Daugavpils, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 6 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS lead the league with 17 wins and 50 goals this season; at home they average 3.22 goals per game with 17.33 shots and 6.78 shots on target, winning 78% of home matches. Defensively the hosts concede only 0.67 goals at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, while BFC Daugavpils concede 2.0 goals on average away and have recorded no clean sheets. Rīgas FS have a higher home xG (xG 2.06) versus the visitors' away xG (1.53) and superior shot conversion (19% vs 10%), which translates into higher-quality chances alongside a greater number of shots on target. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and won 4 of 5, whereas the visitors have only 3 goals in that period (0.6 per game) with 1 win and 4 draws, underscoring their tendency to share points. Considering the hosts' superiority in attack, xG and defense, I tip a Rīgas FS victory, although the visitors regularly score away (0% of away games without a goal), so their scoring cannot be ruled out.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is that BFC Daugavpils has a season BTTS rate of 100%, while Rīgas FS at home has a seasonal BTTS of only 25%. However, in the last 5 matches the home side shows BTTS 60% and the visitors only 40% in that period, producing mixed but still meaningful indications for goals at both ends. Additionally BFC concedes on average 2.0 goals per match across the season, while Rīgas FS has scored 14 goals in the last 5 fixtures (avg. 2.8), so the hosts have the potential to exploit the opponents’ defensive weakness. Against the both-teams-to-score scenario speaks 42% of Rīgas FS’s home matches being clean sheet expected and BFC’s only 0.6 goals per match over the last 5 (3 goals total). Considering the visitors’ seasonal 100% BTTS, the league BTTS 56% and an equal seasonal xG of 1.53 for both teams, I favor the BTTS - Yes scenario and rate BTTS at 65% vs 35%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and form analysis points to a game with more than three goals: combined xG is 1.53 + 1.53 = 3.06, while the league average goals is 2.98. Rīgas FS averaged 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches (14 goals) and had an xG of 1.92 over those five, whereas BFC Daugavpils concedes on average 2.0 goals this season and all away matches saw Both Teams To Score (100% of such fixtures). After averaging xG and accounting for form I adopt expected_goals_home = 1.70 and expected_goals_away = 1.42 (total 3.12), which in a Poisson model translates to roughly an 82% chance of Over 1.5 and about 60% for Over 2.5. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (82%), therefore I recommend the 'over' on the 1.5 line; Over 3.5 is less likely (~38%), so I avoid that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time: the home side are drawing at the break in 58% of matches and the visitors in 63%, yielding roughly a 60% chance of a HT draw. After the break the home side look stronger — in their last five outings they averaged 1.6 goals in the second half versus 0.6 for the away side, and the home team recorded 80% of the second-half wins across those five matches versus 20% for the visitors. Seasonal comparison reinforces this: the home team won 42% of matches versus 13% for the visitors, and at half-time the home side score an average of 0.42 goals and concede only 0.17, giving them the advantage in the decisive half. Therefore the most likely scenario is X/1 (draw HT, home win FT) — I assess it at 36%; other strong signals are X/X at 18% and 1/1 at 18%. Scenarios with the visitors leading at the break are rare (visitors lead at the break in 13% of matches), hence low probabilities for variants featuring their early lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
14Shots10
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
2Shots on target5
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
1.61xG1.41
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
4Corners1
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
81Dangerous attacks59
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
16Fouls13
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
1Cards2
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
2.5Goals scored / game1.05
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
0.7Goals allowed / game1.25
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
62%Average possession48%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
6.55Shots on target / game4.6
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.75Shots per game12.9
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
6.55Shots on target4.6
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
14.9%Shot conversion8.1%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
62%Possession48%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
2.04xG for1.53
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
0.83xG against1.58
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rīgas FS is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.4 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Rīgas FS
WWLWW
Season result split
85% W5% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-1-2
2.60 pts / game · goal difference +36
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
BFC Daugavpils
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-8
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 138% better for: goals scored per game.

2.5 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.05 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

Rīgas FS is 79% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.7 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.25 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 95% of games (19 of 20 meczów), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: mixed

BFC Daugavpils scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 55% (11 of 20 meczów).

50Goals scored (season)21
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
14Goals conceded (season)25
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
3.2Average goals per game2.3
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
14Goals scored (last 5)3
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal70%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
70%2 goals25%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
45%3 goals10%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
25%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal75%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
15%2 goals25%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
10%3 goals15%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
0%4 goals10%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time5%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
55%Scored in both halves15%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
60%BTTS - last 540%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time45%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.95 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.2 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Rīgas FS - half-time state
55% leading30% draw15% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.95Points per game (1st half)1.2
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
1.15Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
1.6Average goals (1st half)0.65
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
70%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
30%No goal before half-time75%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

2.15Points per game (2nd half)1
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
1.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
80%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils
20%No goal after half-time40%
Rīgas FSBFC Daugavpils

Rīgas FS - second-half results

60% W35% R5% P
39
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at halftime in 55% of games and wins 85%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

15% W55% R30% P
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Rīgas FS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.60
Goals scored / game1.21.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game0.01.0
1 goal0%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
10
2
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
2
46-60
8
1
61-75
11
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
3
31-45
10
9
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+76%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals per game 3.202.96 2.30
Both teams scored 40%56% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%53% 35%
Clean sheets 55%24% 25%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 45%
Goal after half-time 80%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardErvīns Piņaskins
  2. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Alain Cedric Herve KouadioOff: Mor Talla Gaye
  3. BFC DaugavpilsGoalPapa Omar Gningue
  4. Rīgas FSYellow cardAlain Cedric Herve Kouadio
  5. Rīgas FSGoalRihards Matrevics

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 6 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against BFC Daugavpils. Games average 4.83 goals, and both teams scored in 83% of them.

BFC Daugavpils
0 : 1
Rīgas FS
Rīgas FS
4 : 1
BFC Daugavpils
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
5 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 7
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
5 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs BFC Daugavpils?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 3:1 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and BFC Daugavpils?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 6, BFC Daugavpils won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs BFC Daugavpils?

Rīgas FS score 2.50 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.05. The Virsliga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Rīgas FS's matches and 55% of BFC Daugavpils's.

What form are Rīgas FS and BFC Daugavpils in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs BFC Daugavpils?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.