Latvia - VirsligaStadions Arkādija grassData current as of September 06, 2026

Rīgas FS vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
4 : 0half-time 1:0
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Rīgas FS vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS played against FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 21, 2026. Venue: Stadions Arkādija grass. Final score: 4:0.

Recent form

Rīgas FS has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. FS Jelgava has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS scores 2.23 goals per game and allows 0.69. FS Jelgava scores 0.77 and allows 1.85. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 31% of Rīgas FS's games and 38% of FS Jelgava's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 38%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 2.05 to 1.21 per game. Rīgas FS takes 17.4 shots per game, while FS Jelgava takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 54% of its games and scores 1.15 goals per game after halftime. FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.23 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For FS Jelgava, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS lead the table (1st) with a record of 11 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss and 29 goals scored this season, including 16 in the last 5 matches (avg. 3.2 per game). At home the hosts score an average of 2.67 goals and concede 0.83 per match, with an average xG of 1.90 versus opponent xG 0.87; they also register 60% possession, 6 shots on target and 16.33 total shots per game. FS Jelgava have only 0.71 goals per away match and concede 1.43, producing 2.43 shots on target and xG 1.22, with a conversion rate of 7% and no goal in 43% of away fixtures. The gap is also evident in recent form: the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches (scoring 16 goals), while the visitors have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss with 4 goals in the same period. Considering the home advantage in quality of chances (xG 1.90 vs 1.22), finishing efficiency (16% vs 7%) and defensive stability at home, I tip Rīgas FS to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 33% for Rīgas FS and 43% for FS Jelgava, while the league average BTTS is 60%, so both teams are below the league rate. In the last 5 matches Rīgas FS had BTTS in 40% of games, and Jelgava only in 20%; the home side scored 16 goals in the last 5 (3.2 per match) versus 4 away goals (0.8 per match). FS Jelgava has poor goal output: 10 goals this season (0.71 per match) and a low shot conversion of 7%, despite an xG per match of 1.22, indicating chance creation without finishing. Rīgas FS in the last 5 records xG 2.12 and seasonal xG 1.19, so the hosts are more effective offensively, although seasonally they concede 2.33 goals on average, indicating some defensive instability. Considering Jelgava’s very low efficiency and goal output (10 goals/season and 0.8 in L5) and Riga’s stronger attack in the last 5, I forecast a higher probability of BTTS = "No" (65%) than "Yes" (35%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model combines attacking xG with opponent defensive xG: Rīgas FS attacking xG 1.19 and FS Jelgava defensive xG 1.77 yield 1.48 expected goals for the home side, while away attacking xG 1.22 and home defensive xG 1.52 yield 1.37 for the visitors — a total of 2.85 goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.85 translates to roughly a 78% chance of Over 1.5, 54% for Over 2.5 and 32% for Over 3.5. In the last 5 matches Rīgas FS scored an average of 3.2 goals (16 goals in 5 matches) and had last5 xG 2.12, while FS Jelgava has 0.8 goals in the last 5 (4 goals) and last5 xG 1.3, suggesting greater attacking activity from the home side. Both teams generate many chances (homes 9.0 shots and 3.0 on target vs guests 9.86 and 2.43), and the home conversion of 9% versus 7% for the visitors further supports goal expectation. For these reasons the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (over) — Over 2.5 offers only a marginal edge (54%), and Over 3.5 is too risky (32%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back 1/1 (home leading at half-time and winning) because Rīgas FS have averaged 2.0 goals before the break in their last five matches and led at the break in 80% of those games, while also averaging 3.2 goals per match across those five appearances. FS Jelgava have averaged just 0.4 goals before the break in their last five and led at the break in only 20% of cases, weakening their chances of taking a lead at the break. Over the season Jelgava, however, have led at the break in 43% of matches and recorded 86% clean sheets to half-time, so scenarios where the visitors lead at half-time and win (2/2) remain material. Rīgas show superior overall form (last 5: dwwww, averaging 2.6 points per game) compared to Jelgava (wlwdd, averaging 1.6 points per game) and generate more shots on target on average (3.0 vs 2.43), which supports a full-time victory for the hosts. Additionally, xG values are similar (1.19 for the home side vs 1.22 for the visitors), so Rīgas’s edge mainly comes from recent attacking form and therefore they are most likely to take a lead at the break and see the match through to a win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

68Possession (%)32
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
22Shots5
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
8Shots on target3
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
2.63xG0.79
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
8Corners4
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
95Dangerous attacks35
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
10Fouls6
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
0Cards0
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.23Goals scored / game0.77
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
0.69Goals allowed / game1.85
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
62%Average possession45%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
6.31Shots on target / game2.69
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.38Shots per game9.46
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
6.31Shots on target2.69
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
12.8%Shot conversion8.1%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
62%Possession45%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
2.05xG for1.21
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
0.81xG against1.65
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantFS Jelgava: Balanced
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)36%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rīgas FS is 63% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.6 pts / game - FS Jelgava

Rīgas FS
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
85% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-1
2.62 pts / game · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.10Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
FS Jelgava
WLWDD
Season result split
23% W31% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 190% better for: goals scored per game.

2.23 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 0.77 goals / game - FS Jelgava

Rīgas FS is 168% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.69 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.85 goals / game - FS Jelgava

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 92% of games (12 of 13 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: more difficult

FS Jelgava scores in 54% of games (7 of 13 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 62% (8 of 13 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)10
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
9Goals conceded (season)24
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
2.92Average goals per game2.62
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
16Goals scored (last 5)4
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal54%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
62%2 goals23%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
38%3 goals0%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
23%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

38%1 goal77%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
15%2 goals31%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
15%3 goals23%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
0%4 goals15%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time15%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
46%Scored in both halves8%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
40%BTTS - last 520%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.92 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.31 pts / game - FS Jelgava

Rīgas FS - half-time state
54% leading31% draw15% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.92Points per game (1st half)1.31
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
1.08Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.23
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
69%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
31%No goal before half-time62%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)0.92
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)0.23
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
0.23Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
85%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava
31%No goal after half-time77%
Rīgas FSFS Jelgava

Rīgas FS - second-half results

54% W38% R8% P
25
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 54% of games and wins 85%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

23% W23% R54% P
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 23%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Rīgas FS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.402.00
Goals scored / game2.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game2.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+6+4
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 10
FS Jelgava - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
1
16-30
5
4
31-45
5
1
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals per game 2.923.09 2.62
Both teams scored 31%60% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%56% 38%
Clean sheets 62%21% 23%
Goal before half-time 77%76% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%87% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / game
1.47
Away goals / game
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defensive advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Mārtiņš ĶigursOff: Strahinja Rakić
  2. Rīgas FSGoalDarko LemajićAssist: Lasha Odisharia
  3. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Miloš PudilOff: David Holoubek
  4. Rīgas FSGoalHerdi PrengaAssist: Haruna Rasid Njie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against FS Jelgava. Games average 2.40 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

FS Jelgava
0 : 1
Rīgas FS
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
1 : 4
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
0 : 1
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FS Jelgava
2 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
1 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 4:0 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and FS Jelgava?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 3, FS Jelgava won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs FS Jelgava?

Rīgas FS score 2.23 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.77. The Virsliga average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Rīgas FS's matches and 38% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Rīgas FS and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and FS Jelgava 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs FS Jelgava?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs FS Jelgava — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.