Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 22 July 2026

Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rīgas FS play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Rīgas FS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rīgas FS scores 2.39 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rīgas FS 43%, Super Nova 61%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS 57%, Super Nova 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.19. Rīgas FS: 16.0 shots per match, Super Nova: 9.0.

Match halves

Rīgas FS: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.30. Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Rīgas FS: 76-90+ (12 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 5-0-0. Average goals 3.60, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Rīgas FS has a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 18 shots and 7 shots on target per match with xG 2.12, translating to 2.00 goals scored per match and a +4 home goal differential. Super Nova on the road averages 10.25 shots and 4.25 on target with xG 1.36, scores 1.5 goals per away match and posts a higher conversion rate (15% vs the hosts' 11%), but creates significantly fewer chances. Defensively the hosts look stronger: Rīgas FS concedes only 0.67 goals per home match with xG against 0.67, while Super Nova concedes 1.0 goals on average away and has 9 goals conceded this season. Recent form also favors the hosts — Rīgas FS have won 4 of their last 5 matches and collect 2.4 points per match in that period, whereas Super Nova have won 3 of 5 and average 2.0 points per match. Considering the possession advantage (67% vs 43%), superior quantity and quality of chances (xG 2.12 vs 1.36 and 7 vs 4.25 shots on target) and more solid defense (0.67 vs 1.0), I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
19Shots3
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
5Shots on target2
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2.05xG0.58
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
10Corners5
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
70Dangerous attacks34
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
13Fouls12
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2Cards4
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2.39Goals scored / match1.09
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.7Goals conceded / match1.52
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
62%Average possession45%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
6.09Shots on target / match3.61
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match9.04
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
6.09Shots on target3.61
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
14.9%Shot conversion12%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
62%Possession45%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.95xG for1.19
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.89xG against1.67
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rīgas FS is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 1.2 pts / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
83% W9% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-2-2
2.57 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

2.39 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 1.09 goals / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS is 117% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.7 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 1.52 goals / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).

55Goals scored (season)25
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
16Goals conceded (season)35
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
3.09Average goals in match2.61
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
13Goals scored (last 5)6
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2Goals conceded (last 5)10
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal78%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
65%2 goals26%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
43%3 goals4%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
22%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal78%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
13%2 goals48%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
9%3 goals13%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%4 goals9%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time30%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
52%Scored in both halves9%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
40%BTTS - last 560%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 1.04 pts / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS - half-time state
57% leading30% draw13% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.04
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.09Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.39
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
74%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
30%No goal before half-time57%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

2.09Points per match (2nd half)1.22
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.3Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.22
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
74%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
22%No goal after half-time57%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Rīgas FS - second-half results

57% W39% R4% P
46
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rīgas FS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
11
2
16-30
8
5
31-45
9
2
46-60
9
2
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 3.092.98 2.61
Both teams scored 43%56% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%55% 57%
Clean sheets 52%24% 22%
Goal before half-time 78%75% 61%
Goal after half-time 78%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Rīgas FS 5 - 0 - 0 Super Nova. Average goals 3.60, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Super Nova
1 : 2
Rīgas FS
SK Super Nova
1 : 3
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
4 : 1
SK Super Nova
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 2:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Super Nova?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 5, Super Nova won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

Rīgas FS score 2.39 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.09. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Rīgas FS's matches and 61% of Super Nova's.

What form are Rīgas FS and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Super Nova 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.