Latvia - VirsligaData current as of September 06, 2026

Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS played against Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Rīgas FS has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Super Nova has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 0.50. Super Nova scores 1.33 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Rīgas FS's games and 83% of Super Nova's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.32 per game. Rīgas FS takes 16.8 shots per game, while Super Nova takes 10.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Super Nova, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS has a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 18 shots and 7 shots on target per match with xG 2.12, translating to 2.00 goals scored per match and a +4 home goal differential. Super Nova on the road averages 10.25 shots and 4.25 on target with xG 1.36, scores 1.5 goals per away match and posts a higher conversion rate (15% vs the hosts' 11%), but creates significantly fewer chances. Defensively the hosts look stronger: Rīgas FS concedes only 0.67 goals per home match with xG against 0.67, while Super Nova concedes 1.0 goals on average away and has 9 goals conceded this season. Recent form also favors the hosts — Rīgas FS have won 4 of their last 5 matches and collect 2.4 points per match in that period, whereas Super Nova have won 3 of 5 and average 2.0 points per match. Considering the possession advantage (67% vs 43%), superior quantity and quality of chances (xG 2.12 vs 1.36 and 7 vs 4.25 shots on target) and more solid defense (0.67 vs 1.0), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS scenario appears more likely: Rīgas FS has BTTS in 100% of home matches, while Super Nova records BTTS in 75% of away games, against a league BTTS average of 61%. Season averages show Rīgas scores 1.0 and concedes 2.5 goals per match, whereas Super Nova scores 1.5 and concedes 1.0, so Rīgas has a clear tendency to concede. Combined expected xG is 2.62 (1.26 + 1.36), and on-target shots are 4.0 for Rīgas and 4.25 for Super Nova, confirming both teams create scoring opportunities. As a caveat, in the last 5 matches Rīgas had only 40% BTTS versus 80% for Super Nova, but Rīgas in that period recorded a recent xG of 1.91 and scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches, so this does not rule out both teams scoring. Considering 100% BTTS at home, 75% away, combined xG of 2.62 and league BTTS level of 61%, I recommend BTTS "yes" with a probability of 80% versus 20%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projection based on xG and statistics yields 1.29 expected goals for the home side (home xG 1.26 vs xG conceded by Super Nova 1.32) and 1.61 for the visitors (away xG 1.36 vs xG conceded by Rīgas FS 1.85), totaling 2.90 expected goals. Season metrics show Rīgas FS matches finished over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases, and Super Nova in 75% of cases; additionally, home matches had goals from both teams in 100% of games, and away matches in 75%, which increases the likelihood of goals. A Poisson distribution model with λ=2.90 calculates roughly a 78.5% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 55% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and around 33% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5), therefore the strongest and most reliable selection is Over 1.5. The last 5 rounds confirm the offensive trend: Rīgas FS in the last 5 has xG 1.91 and on average 1.6 scored with 0.6 conceded, while Super Nova has xG 1.31 and on average 1.4 scored with 1.4 conceded, which supports the forecast.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Super Nova appear to be clear favorites: seasonal points per match are 2.25 for the away side versus 0.50 for the home side, and win percentages are 75% vs 0%. First-half HT statistics strongly favor the visitors — the home team concedes on average 2.0 goals by the break (concededAVGHT_home = 2.0) and were trailing at halftime in 2 of 2 cases (100%), while the visitors score on average 1.0 goal before the break (scoredAVGHT_away = 1.0) and led at the break in 2 cases (50%). Offensive xG is similar (1.26 for the home team vs 1.36 for the visitors), but Rīgas FS’s defense is clearly weaker (xG against 1.85 vs 1.32), which increases the likelihood that the visitors’ lead at the break will be maintained after halftime. Additionally, both teams’ matches often end with goals at both ends (BTTS 100% for the home side, 75% for the visitors), so I expect an exchange of goals rather than a goalless draw. On this basis I assign the highest probability to the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and winning by full-time (2/2), while also allocating small chances to a draw or a turnaround in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
19Shots3
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
5Shots on target2
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2.05xG0.58
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
10Corners5
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
70Dangerous attacks34
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
13Fouls12
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2Cards4
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.67Goals scored / game1.33
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.5Goals allowed / game1.5
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
64%Average possession42%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
6Shots on target / game4.17
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.83Shots per game10.33
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
6Shots on target4.17
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
9.9%Shot conversion12.9%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
64%Possession42%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.99xG for1.32
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.69xG against1.5
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)36%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rīgas FS is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 2 pts / game - Super Nova

Rīgas FS
WWLWW
Season result split
83% W0% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-1
2.50 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 0.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Super Nova
DWWWL
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 away
3-0-1
LWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.33 goals / game - Super Nova

Rīgas FS is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.5 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.5 goals / game - Super Nova

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

10Goals scored (season)8
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
3Goals conceded (season)9
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2.17Average goals per game2.83
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal100%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
50%2 goals33%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
17%3 goals0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
17%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal83%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%2 goals33%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%3 goals17%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%4 goals17%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
33%Scored in both halves0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
40%BTTS - last 580%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.17 pts / game - Super Nova

Rīgas FS - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per game (1st half)1.17
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.83
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1Average goals (1st half)1.67
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
33%No goal before half-time50%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)1.17
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
83%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
50%No goal after half-time50%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Rīgas FS - second-half results

33% W67% R0% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Super Nova - second-half results

33% W17% R50% P
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rīgas FS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Super Nova - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.20
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
4
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
31%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaSuper Nova
Average goals per game 2.172.79 2.83
Both teams scored 33%62% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%50% 67%
Clean sheets 50%19% 17%
Goal before half-time 83%82% 83%
Goal after half-time 50%82% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / game
1.62
Away goals / game
+-27%
Home attack advantage
+-37%
Home defensive advantage
+-24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super NovaYellow cardAlens Grikovs
  2. Rīgas FSYellow cardStrahinja Rakić
  3. Rīgas FSGoalJānis IkaunieksAssist: Darko Lemajić
  4. Super NovaYellow cardŅikita Barkovskis
  5. Super NovaYellow cardMārcis Ošs
  6. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Gauthier MankendaOff: Darko Lemajić
  7. Super NovaYellow cardMilāns Tihonovičs
  8. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Alain Cedric Herve KouadioOff: Ismael Diomandé
  9. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Haruna Rasid NjieOff: Stefan Panić
  10. Rīgas FSYellow cardAleksandar Filipović

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 4 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Super Nova. Games average 3.75 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

SK Super Nova
1 : 3
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
4 : 1
SK Super Nova
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 2:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Super Nova?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 4, Super Nova won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

Rīgas FS score 1.67 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.33. The Virsliga average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Rīgas FS's matches and 83% of Super Nova's.

What form are Rīgas FS and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Super Nova 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.