Bulgaria - Second LeagueStadion IskarData current as of September 07, 2026

Rilski Sportist vs Montana: match statistics

Rilski Sportist crest
Rilski Sportist
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Montana crest
Montana

Rilski Sportist vs Montana: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rilski Sportist played against Montana in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: Stadion Iskar. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Rilski Sportist has 0 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.50 points per game. Montana has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.

Scoring records

Rilski Sportist scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. Montana scores 2.00 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Rilski Sportist's games and 75% of Montana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 75%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rilski Sportist has the higher season xG average, 1.88 to 1.64 per game. Rilski Sportist takes 15.5 shots per game, while Montana takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Rilski Sportist leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Montana leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rilski Sportist's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Montana, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second League games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Montana sit 5th, while Rilski Sportist are only 16th, and across the season the visitors have won 2 of 4 meetings, scoring 8 goals compared with the hosts’ 0 wins and 3 goals. The visitors are more clinical: they average 2 goals per away match and convert 17% of their shots, whereas Rilski score just once on average despite 16.5 attempts and an xG of 2.02. The hosts’ strengths are 64% possession and the better quality of chances they allow, as their opponents generate an average of 0.93 xG, while Montana concede as much as 1.86 away from home. At the same time, the visitors’ defense remains a clear risk, conceding an average of 2.5 goals away and failing to keep a clean sheet. However, the recent five-match form slightly favors Montana, who have collected 1.4 points per game compared with Rilski’s 1.0, so the visitors should be given the edge to secure a narrow victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as Montana has recorded BTTS in 100% of its matches so far, while both teams have reached 60% in their last five fixtures. Rilski Sportist averages 2.0 goals at home, whereas Montana concedes as many as 2.5 goals per away match and has kept no clean sheets. The visitors should also create chances: their average of 2.0 goals scored and xG of 1.49 look solid against Rilski’s xG against of 1.22. Although the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their home matches, their recent defensive performances saw them concede an average of 1.2 goals, while Montana scored 1.6 goals per game over the same period. In addition, neither team has finished a match without scoring, making the BTTS - Yes scenario more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Rilski Sportist generate an average of 1.81 xG, while Montana concede an average of 1.86 xG, clearly supporting at least two home goals or a high volume of chances from the hosts. The visitors score an average of 2.0 goals per match from 1.49 xG, while Rilski Sportist have conceded an average of 1.2 goals in their last five matches. Montana are yet to keep a clean sheet and have exceeded both the 1.5-goal and 2.5-goal lines in 100% of their matches, while both teams have scored in every game. Although the league average is 2.5 goals, the projected total of 3.10 and Montana’s defensive numbers provide the strongest betting edge on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: in Rilski’s two home matches to date and Montana’s two away games, both teams were level after the first 45 minutes. This trend is supported by their recent form, with the hosts drawing at half-time in 50% of their matches and Montana in as many as 80%, while neither side has held a half-time lead. After the break, the advantage should shift to Rilski Sportist, who average 1.5 goals in the second half at home and concede none during that period, whereas Montana concede an average of 1.0 goal away from home. The hosts also have a significantly stronger full-match record on home turf: they win 100% of their matches, score an average of 2.0 goals and concede only 0.5, while Montana have not won any away game and allow opponents to score 2.5 goals per match. Rilski’s higher xG of 1.81 compared with Montana’s 1.49 further supports a scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Rilski SportistMontana
12Shots14
Rilski SportistMontana
3Shots on target7
Rilski SportistMontana
1.24xG1.67
Rilski SportistMontana
4Corners7
Rilski SportistMontana
38Dangerous attacks41
Rilski SportistMontana
12Fouls16
Rilski SportistMontana
0Cards0
Rilski SportistMontana

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rilski SportistMontana
0.75Goals scored / game2
Rilski SportistMontana
1.25Goals allowed / game1.5
Rilski SportistMontana
55%Average possession53%
Rilski SportistMontana
5Shots on target / game4.75
Rilski SportistMontana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.5Shots per game13
Rilski SportistMontana
5Shots on target4.75
Rilski SportistMontana
4.8%Shot conversion15.4%
Rilski SportistMontana
55%Possession53%
Rilski SportistMontana
1.88xG for1.64
Rilski SportistMontana
1.63xG against1.54
Rilski SportistMontana

Shooting quality

Rilski Sportist: DominantMontana: Efficient finishing
Rilski SportistMontana
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Montana is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.5 pts / game - Rilski Sportist · 1.75 pts / game - Montana

Rilski Sportist
LLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 25%
Montana
DWLW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montana is 167% better for: goals scored per game.

0.75 goals / game - Rilski Sportist · 2 goals / game - Montana

Rilski Sportist is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Rilski Sportist · 1.5 goals / game - Montana

Rilski Sportist scoring profile: strong

Rilski Sportist scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).

Montana scoring profile: very strong

Montana scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Rilski Sportist keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

3Goals scored (season)8
Rilski SportistMontana
5Goals conceded (season)6
Rilski SportistMontana
2Average goals per game3.5
Rilski SportistMontana
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Rilski SportistMontana
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Rilski SportistMontana

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%2 goals75%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%3 goals25%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%4 goals0%
Rilski SportistMontana

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%2 goals50%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%3 goals25%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%4 goals0%
Rilski SportistMontana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time75%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%BTTS in both halves25%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Scored in both halves50%
Rilski SportistMontana

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rilski SportistMontana
50%BTTS - last 575%
Rilski SportistMontana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Rilski SportistMontana

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Montana is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - Rilski Sportist · 1 pts / game - Montana

Rilski Sportist - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Montana - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
0.25Goals scored (1st half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
1Average goals (1st half)2
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana
75%No goal before half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.75
Rilski SportistMontana
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Rilski SportistMontana
1Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Rilski SportistMontana
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Rilski SportistMontana
50%No goal after half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana

Rilski Sportist - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Montana - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
4
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rilski Sportist - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.501.25
Goals scored / game0.30.5
Goals allowed / game0.80.5
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Montana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.75
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.5
Average goals per game2.01.5
1 goal75%100%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 75% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rilski Sportist
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Montana
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rilski Sportist

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Montana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

Rilski SportistLigaMontana
Average goals per game 2.002.57 3.50
Both teams scored 50%49% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%41% 75%
Clean sheets 0%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%62% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%76% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Rilski Sportist vs Montana?

The Second League match finished Rilski Sportist 2:1 Montana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Rilski Sportist vs Montana?

Rilski Sportist score 0.75 goals per game on average and Montana 2.00. The Second League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Rilski Sportist's matches and 75% of Montana's.

What form are Rilski Sportist and Montana in?

Over the last 5 games Rilski Sportist have a 0-2-2 record (0.50 points per game) and Montana 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rilski Sportist vs Montana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.