RKC Waalwijk vs Utrecht II: match statistics
RKC Waalwijk displays significantly better form over the last five matches, earning 2 points per game compared to Utrecht II's 1.4. The hosts have won three of their last five meetings, whereas the visitors recorded only two wins. A key advantage for RKC is their home disposition—averaging 1.55 goals per home match with an xG of 1.85, highlighting their offensive efficiency. Utrecht II struggles on the road, losing 45% of their away games and keeping a clean sheet in just 9%. Furthermore, the visitors are on a negative streak of five consecutive away defeats. While both teams concede a similar number of goals, the possession advantage (52% vs 47%) and RKC's superior chance conversion favor the hosts. I expect a win for RKC Waalwijk, though Utrecht II poses a threat given their average of 1.36 goals on the road.
RKC Waalwijk vs Utrecht II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RKC Waalwijk played against Utrecht II in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on January 26, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
RKC Waalwijk has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Utrecht II has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
RKC Waalwijk scores 1.65 goals per game and allows 1.57. Utrecht II scores 1.74 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.34 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 74% of RKC Waalwijk's games and 70% of Utrecht II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 70%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
RKC Waalwijk has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.60 per game. RKC Waalwijk takes 15.3 shots per game, while Utrecht II takes 14.1.
First-half and second-half trends
RKC Waalwijk leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. Utrecht II leads at halftime in 30% and scores 1.09 after halftime.
When the teams score
RKC Waalwijk's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Utrecht II, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.34 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RKC Waalwijk displays significantly better form over the last five matches, earning 2 points per game compared to Utrecht II's 1.4. The hosts have won three of their last five meetings, whereas the visitors recorded only two wins. A key advantage for RKC is their home disposition—averaging 1.55 goals per home match with an xG of 1.85, highlighting their offensive efficiency. Utrecht II struggles on the road, losing 45% of their away games and keeping a clean sheet in just 9%. Furthermore, the visitors are on a negative streak of five consecutive away defeats. While both teams concede a similar number of goals, the possession advantage (52% vs 47%) and RKC's superior chance conversion favor the hosts. I expect a win for RKC Waalwijk, though Utrecht II poses a threat given their average of 1.36 goals on the road.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RKC Waalwijk | Utrecht II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Utrecht II is 5% better for: goals scored per game.
1.65 goals / game - RKC Waalwijk · 1.74 goals / game - Utrecht II
RKC Waalwijk is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - RKC Waalwijk · 1.83 goals / game - Utrecht II
RKC Waalwijk scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
Utrecht II scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while RKC Waalwijk keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RKC Waalwijk
Over / Under - Utrecht II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RKC Waalwijk is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / game - RKC Waalwijk · 1.22 pts / game - Utrecht II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RKC Waalwijk - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Utrecht II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RKC Waalwijk
Utrecht II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| RKC Waalwijk | Liga | Utrecht II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.22 | 3.34 | ▲ 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 63% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 61% | 66% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 20% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from RKC Waalwijk's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Utrecht II. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RKC Waalwijk vs Utrecht II?
The Eerste Divisie match finished RKC Waalwijk 2:2 Utrecht II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RKC Waalwijk vs Utrecht II?
RKC Waalwijk score 1.65 goals per game on average and Utrecht II 1.74. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 74% of RKC Waalwijk's matches and 70% of Utrecht II's.
What form are RKC Waalwijk and Utrecht II in?
Over the last 5 games RKC Waalwijk have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Utrecht II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RKC Waalwijk vs Utrecht II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.