Scotland - ChampionshipData current as of September 06, 2026

Ross County vs Queen's Park: match statistics

Ross County crest
Ross County
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Queen's Park crest
Queen's Park
145%(1.73)
X30%(3.75)
225%(4.10)

Ross County are showing better form in their last five matches with a record of two wins and 1.2 points per game, while Queen's Park are averaging just 0.8 points per match. The hosts have an advantage in shooting efficiency at home with a conversion rate of 9% and an average of 1.17 goals per game, which exceeds the visitors' away xG (0.93). Queen's Park have a poor defensive record in away matches, conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game and keeping only 18% clean sheets. Despite Ross County losing 58% of their home matches, their higher possession (46% vs 43%) and better form point to the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, I expect a close match with a slight edge for Ross County, although a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Queen's Park's high tendency to draw away (36%).

Ross County vs Queen's Park: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ross County played against Queen's Park in Championship (Scotland). The game was played on February 14, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Ross County has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Queen's Park has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Ross County scores 0.96 goals per game and allows 1.65. Queen's Park scores 1.05 and allows 1.59. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Ross County's games and 64% of Queen's Park's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 55%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ross County has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 0.98 per game. Ross County takes 11.7 shots per game, while Queen's Park takes 7.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Ross County leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Queen's Park leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ross County's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Queen's Park, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Championship games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ross County are showing better form in their last five matches with a record of two wins and 1.2 points per game, while Queen's Park are averaging just 0.8 points per match. The hosts have an advantage in shooting efficiency at home with a conversion rate of 9% and an average of 1.17 goals per game, which exceeds the visitors' away xG (0.93). Queen's Park have a poor defensive record in away matches, conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game and keeping only 18% clean sheets. Despite Ross County losing 58% of their home matches, their higher possession (46% vs 43%) and better form point to the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, I expect a close match with a slight edge for Ross County, although a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Queen's Park's high tendency to draw away (36%).

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
Ross CountyQueen's Park
8Shots11
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1Shots on target3
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.02xG1.24
Ross CountyQueen's Park
4Corners2
Ross CountyQueen's Park
61Dangerous attacks46
Ross CountyQueen's Park
11Fouls11
Ross CountyQueen's Park
2Cards2
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.96Goals scored / game1.05
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.65Goals allowed / game1.59
Ross CountyQueen's Park
47%Average possession44%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
3.83Shots on target / game2.95
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.7Shots per game7.64
Ross CountyQueen's Park
3.83Shots on target2.95
Ross CountyQueen's Park
8.2%Shot conversion13.7%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
47%Possession44%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.35xG for0.98
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.55xG against1.66
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Shooting quality

Ross County: BalancedQueen's Park: Counter-attacking
Ross CountyQueen's Park
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ross County is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Ross County · 1.4 pts / game - Queen's Park

Ross County
DWWLW
Season result split
22% W30% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-11
0.96 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Queen's Park
WDLWL
Season result split
18% W41% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-9
0.95 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queen's Park is 9% better for: goals scored per game.

0.96 goals / game - Ross County · 1.05 goals / game - Queen's Park

Ross County scoring profile: strong

Ross County scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 meczów), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 meczów).

Queen's Park scoring profile: strong

Queen's Park scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 meczów), while Ross County keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)23
Ross CountyQueen's Park
38Goals conceded (season)35
Ross CountyQueen's Park
2.61Average goals per game2.64
Ross CountyQueen's Park
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Ross CountyQueen's Park
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
Ross CountyQueen's Park

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal68%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
26%2 goals27%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
9%3 goals9%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0%4 goals0%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal77%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
57%2 goals36%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
22%3 goals23%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
4%4 goals18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time27%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
17%Scored in both halves18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0%BTTS - last 560%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Queen's Park is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / game - Ross County · 1.18 pts / game - Queen's Park

Ross County - half-time state
22% leading43% draw35% trailing
Queen's Park - half-time state
23% leading50% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per game (1st half)1.18
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.32
Ross CountyQueen's Park
48%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
70%No goal before half-time55%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

After half-time (2nd half)

0.78Points per game (2nd half)1.05
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.32
Ross CountyQueen's Park
30%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
52%No goal after half-time59%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Ross County - second-half results

17% W26% R57% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Queen's Park - second-half results

23% W36% R41% P
26
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 18%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ross County - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Queen's Park - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ross County
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
7
16-30
7
7
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ross County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Ross CountyLigaQueen's Park
Average goals per game 2.612.48 2.64
Both teams scored 43%50% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%45% 55%
Clean sheets 26%31% 23%
Goal before half-time 65%70% 68%
Goal after half-time 87%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queen's ParkYellow cardLouis Longridge
  2. Ross CountyYellow cardDylan Smith
  3. Queen's ParkGoalMatthew ShielsAssist: Aidan Connolly
  4. Ross CountyYellow cardConnor Steven Randall
  5. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Grant SavouryOff: Callum Smith
  6. Ross CountySubstitutionOn: James ScottOff: Jamie Lindsay
  7. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Michael RuthOff: Sebastian Drozd
  8. Queen's ParkYellow cardRoddy MacGregor
  9. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Liam McLeishOff: Aidan Connolly

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Sean MurdochMatches officiated: 8
7.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 213%Home wins38%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Ross County's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Queen's Park. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Queen's Park FC
0 : 1
Ross County FC
Ross County FC
1 : 2
Queen's Park FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ross County vs Queen's Park?

The Championship match finished Ross County 0:1 Queen's Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ross County and Queen's Park?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ross County won 1, Queen's Park won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ross County vs Queen's Park?

Ross County score 0.96 goals per game on average and Queen's Park 1.05. The Championship average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ross County's matches and 64% of Queen's Park's.

What form are Ross County and Queen's Park in?

Over the last 5 games Ross County have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queen's Park 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ross County vs Queen's Park?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ross County vs Queen's Park: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.