RSB Berkane vs FAR Rabat: match statistics
RSB Berkane vs FAR Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RSB Berkane played against FAR Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 25, 2026. Venue: Stade Municipal de Berkane. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
RSB Berkane has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. FAR Rabat has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
RSB Berkane scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 0.88. FAR Rabat scores 1.50 and allows 0.58. Games in this league average 2.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of RSB Berkane's games and 46% of FAR Rabat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 42%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FAR Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.41 per game. RSB Berkane takes 10.9 shots per game, while FAR Rabat takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
RSB Berkane leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. FAR Rabat leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
RSB Berkane's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For FAR Rabat, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.13 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAR Rabat are the league leaders (1st) with a record of 39 goals scored and only 15 conceded this season, while RSB Berkane have 35 scored and 23 conceded. At home Berkane win 62% of matches, average 1.54 goals scored and concede 0.92 per game, whereas FAR away average 1.31 goals scored, concede 0.62 and keep 54% clean sheets. Chance creation metrics are similar: home xG for the hosts is 1.61 versus 1.69 xG for the visitors away, and average shots are 11.69 vs 12.23 with 4.38 vs 4.46 on target. The key difference is the hosts’ offensive efficiency and confidence (FTS 15% for Berkane vs 38% for FAR away and conversion 13% vs 11%), while FAR clearly have the better seasonal defense and according to the data have not recorded a defeat (0 losses). Considering FAR’s high tendency to draw away (69% draws) and the home side’s strength, the most likely scenario appears to be a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators show both teams have BTTS 46% (RSB 46%, FAR 46%), below the league average of 50%, while both teams keep a clean sheet in 54% of matches. RSB scores 1.69 and concedes 0.54 goals per game, FAR scores 1.31 and concedes 0.62; xG is 1.54 for RSB and 1.69 for FAR, indicating moderate chance creation with low goals conceded. In the last 5 matches RSB had BTTS in only 20% of games with averages of 0.8 scored and 0.4 conceded, whereas FAR has 60% BTTS with 1.4 scored and 0.6 conceded, so hosts have recently been limiting BTTS occurrences. Additionally, RSB failed to score in only 15% of season matches, while FAR failed to score in 38% of games, and the league features a high clean sheet rate (62%) and a low average goals of 2.13, all of which favor a No Goal scenario. Considering the dominance of defensive signals and weaker home BTTS form, I tip "No" (62%) versus 38% for "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match’s total expected xG is 2.60 — home xG 1.54 and away xG 1.69, with conceded xG of 0.98 (Berkane) and 0.97 (FAR), translating to expected goals of 1.26 for Berkane and 1.34 for FAR. A Poisson model with λ=2.60 yields probabilities of ≥2 goals ≈73% (Over 1.5), ≥3 ≈48% (Over 2.5) and ≥4 ≈26% (Over 3.5). Seasonal data confirm this direction: Berkane have 77% of matches over 1.5 goals, FAR 62%; matches >2.5 goals occur in 46% and 38% respectively. Both teams attempt a similar number of shots (12.15 vs 12.23) and shots on target (4.15 vs 4.46) with conversion rates of 14% (Berkane) and 11% (FAR), supporting moderate finishing and a projected total near 2.6 goals. The strongest signal supports Over 1.5 (recommend Over at the 1.5 line): the combination of xG, seasonal 77%/62% and the Poisson 73% probability provides a clear edge for Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time appears most likely – the home side led at the break in 4 of 13 matches (31%), were level at half-time in 7 of 13 (54%) and trailed in 2 of 13 (15%). After the break the hosts have the edge: they average 1.15 goals in the second half compared to 0.69 for the visitors, and in 85% of the home team’s matches the second half yields at least one goal (vs 54% for the away side). Over the full match RSB Berkane perform better – they win 69% of home fixtures and average 2.38 points per home game, whereas FAR Rabat have a 31% win rate and 1.62 points away; goal averages are 1.69–0.54 for the hosts versus 1.31–0.62 for the guests (scored–conceded). Additionally the home team have higher shot conversion (14% vs 11%) despite similar xG (1.54 vs 1.69), which suggests they are more likely to convert chances after the break; therefore the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at half-time and home win (X/1) is assessed as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RSB Berkane | FAR Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FAR Rabat is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - RSB Berkane · 2.2 pts / game - FAR Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.35 goals / game - RSB Berkane · 1.5 goals / game - FAR Rabat
FAR Rabat is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - RSB Berkane · 0.58 goals / game - FAR Rabat
RSB Berkane scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 meczów).
FAR Rabat scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 meczów), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RSB Berkane
Over / Under - FAR Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RSB Berkane is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / game - RSB Berkane · 1.54 pts / game - FAR Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RSB Berkane - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RSB Berkane
FAR Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| RSB Berkane | Liga | FAR Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.23 | 2.13 | • 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 38% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 31% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from RSB Berkane's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FAR Rabat. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RSB Berkane vs FAR Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished RSB Berkane 2:2 FAR Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RSB Berkane vs FAR Rabat?
RSB Berkane score 1.35 goals per game on average and FAR Rabat 1.50. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of RSB Berkane's matches and 46% of FAR Rabat's.
What form are RSB Berkane and FAR Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games RSB Berkane have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FAR Rabat 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RSB Berkane vs FAR Rabat?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RSB Berkane vs FAR Rabat: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


