Belgium - Pro LeagueLotto ParkData current as of November 03, 2026

RSC Anderlecht vs Zulte-Waregem: match statistics

RSC Anderlecht crest
RSC Anderlecht
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Zulte-Waregem crest
Zulte-Waregem

RSC Anderlecht vs Zulte-Waregem: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

RSC Anderlecht played against Zulte-Waregem in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: Lotto Park. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

RSC Anderlecht has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Zulte-Waregem has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

RSC Anderlecht scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.83. Zulte-Waregem scores 1.67 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 17% of RSC Anderlecht's games and 33% of Zulte-Waregem's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

RSC Anderlecht has the higher season xG average, 1.91 to 1.50 per game. RSC Anderlecht takes 16.7 shots per game, while Zulte-Waregem takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

RSC Anderlecht leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Zulte-Waregem leads at halftime in 17% and scores 1.17 after halftime.

When the teams score

RSC Anderlecht's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Zulte-Waregem, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

RSC Anderlecht have a clear edge in chance creation at home, averaging 19.33 shots and an xG of 2.20, while Zulte-Waregem record 12.33 shots and an xG of 1.46 away from home. The hosts are also highly consistent defensively on their own ground, conceding just 0.33 goals per match with an xGA of 0.73 and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of their games. Anderlecht have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while their home record consists of 2 wins and 1 draw, with no defeats. Zulte-Waregem are also unbeaten away, but as many as 67% of those matches have ended in draws, and the team averages just 43% possession compared with Anderlecht’s 62%. The visitors are more efficient in front of goal, with an 11% conversion rate versus 5%, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. However, the hosts’ greater control and superior chance quality make Anderlecht the preferred side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a low percentage of matches with goals scored by both sides this season, at 33% each, compared with 43% across the league. The signal from the last five matches is even stronger: Anderlecht recorded no BTTS matches, while Zulte-Waregem recorded just 20%. Both teams’ defenses have conceded only 0.6 goals per match recently, with the hosts keeping a clean sheet in 33% of matches and the visitors in as many as 67%. Anderlecht does average 2.0 goals at home, but Zulte-Waregem has conceded just 0.67 goals per match this season, increasing the risk that one side will fail to score. The pick is BTTS - No, as the data on the teams’ current defensive solidity and the very low BTTS frequency clearly outweigh their solid xG figures of 1.55 and 1.46.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest results for both teams point to a controlled match profile: Anderlecht have averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded in their last 5 matches, while Zulte-Waregem have scored 1.6 goals and conceded just 0.6. Each team has recorded fewer than 3.5 goals in 67% of their matches so far, and only 40% of their last five fixtures exceeded the 2.5-goal line. Their average xG figures are solid, at 1.59 for Anderlecht and 1.54 for Zulte-Waregem, but their defenses have limited opponents to 1.13 and 1.38 xG respectively. In addition, Anderlecht have not seen both teams score in any of their last five appearances, while Zulte-Waregem have recorded that scenario only once. The projected total of 2.30 goals leaves a clear margin below four goals, making Under 3.5 goals the strongest option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by an Anderlecht victory at full-time, as Zulte-Waregem were level at the break in all three of their matches so far and recorded this outcome in 60% of their last five games. Anderlecht are nevertheless the stronger side over the course of the season: they have won 67% of their matches and averaged 2.00 points per game, compared with Zulte-Waregem’s 33% win rate and 1.67 points per match. The hosts also create slightly more chances, with an xG of 1.55 compared with the visitors’ 1.46, and average 14.33 shots against 12.33 for their opponents. After half-time, Anderlecht average 1.33 goals scored and concede none, while Zulte-Waregem score 1.00 goal but concede 0.33, further supporting a scenario in which the match is decided in the hosts’ favor in the second half. A cautious start is also likely, as the average number of first-half goals in the teams’ last five matches was just 1.00.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
16Shots10
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
8Shots on target4
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
1.92xG1.17
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
8Corners1
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
49Dangerous attacks36
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
7Fouls11
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
2Cards1
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.67Goals scored / game1.67
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.83Goals allowed / game0.67
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
61%Average possession42%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
4.5Shots on target / game4.67
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.67Shots per game13.33
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
4.5Shots on target4.67
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
4%Shot conversion12.5%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
61%Possession42%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
1.91xG for1.5
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
1.12xG against1.37
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

Shooting quality

RSC Anderlecht: DominantZulte-Waregem: Counter-attacking
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
Accuracy (shots on target)27%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Zulte-Waregem is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - RSC Anderlecht · 1.6 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem

RSC Anderlecht
LLWDW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Zulte-Waregem
DWDWL
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zulte-Waregem is 149% better for: goals scored per game.

0.67 goals / game - RSC Anderlecht · 1.67 goals / game - Zulte-Waregem

Zulte-Waregem is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.83 goals / game - RSC Anderlecht · 0.67 goals / game - Zulte-Waregem

RSC Anderlecht scoring profile: mixed

RSC Anderlecht scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).

Zulte-Waregem scoring profile: mixed

Zulte-Waregem scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while RSC Anderlecht keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).

4Goals scored (season)10
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
5Goals conceded (season)4
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
1.5Average goals per game2.33
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
2Goals scored (last 5)8
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%2 goals67%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%3 goals17%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%4 goals17%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%2 goals17%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%3 goals0%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%4 goals0%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%BTTS in both halves17%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%Scored in both halves33%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%BTTS - last 520%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RSC Anderlecht is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - RSC Anderlecht · 1 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem

RSC Anderlecht - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Zulte-Waregem - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.83Average goals (1st half)1
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
67%No goal before half-time67%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)2
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
67%Clean sheet after half-time83%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem
83%No goal after half-time33%
RSC AnderlechtZulte-Waregem

RSC Anderlecht - second-half results

17% W67% D17% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Zulte-Waregem - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

RSC Anderlecht - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.00.2
1 goal80%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Zulte-Waregem - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.80
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

RSC Anderlecht
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Zulte-Waregem
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
63%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+187%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

RSC Anderlecht

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Zulte-Waregem

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

RSC AnderlechtLigaZulte-Waregem
Average goals per game▼ 1.503.05▼ 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 17%44%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%63%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%30%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%81%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%84%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.75
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Zulte-WaregemYellow cardLaurent Lemoine
  2. RSC AnderlechtYellow cardLukáš Ambros
  3. RSC AnderlechtGoalTawfik Bentayeb
  4. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Brent GabrielOff: Louis Bostyn
  5. RSC AnderlechtGoalMarten WinklerAssist: Tawfik Bentayeb
  6. RSC AnderlechtGoalMarten Winkler
  7. RSC AnderlechtSubstitutionOn: Mihajlo CvetkovićOff: Tawfik Bentayeb
  8. RSC AnderlechtYellow cardMarco Kana

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from RSC Anderlecht's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Zulte-Waregem. Games average 5.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

SV Zulte-Waregem
2 : 4
RSC Anderlecht
RSC Anderlecht
2 : 3
SV Zulte-Waregem

FAQ

What was the result of RSC Anderlecht vs Zulte-Waregem?

The Pro League match finished RSC Anderlecht 3:0 Zulte-Waregem. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between RSC Anderlecht and Zulte-Waregem?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches RSC Anderlecht won 1, Zulte-Waregem won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before RSC Anderlecht vs Zulte-Waregem?

RSC Anderlecht score 0.67 goals per game on average and Zulte-Waregem 1.67. The Pro League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 17% of RSC Anderlecht's matches and 33% of Zulte-Waregem's.

What form are RSC Anderlecht and Zulte-Waregem in?

Over the last 5 games RSC Anderlecht have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Zulte-Waregem 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RSC Anderlecht vs Zulte-Waregem?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RSC Anderlecht vs Zulte-Waregem: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.