Poland - 1. LigaStadion SlaskiData current as of October 22, 2026

Ruch Chorzów vs Unia Skierniewice: match statistics

Ruch Chorzów vs Unia Skierniewice: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ruch Chorzów played against Unia Skierniewice in 1. Liga (Poland). The game was played on September 7, 2026. Venue: Stadion Slaski. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Ruch Chorzów has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Unia Skierniewice has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Ruch Chorzów scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.17. Unia Skierniewice scores 0.83 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 17% of Ruch Chorzów's games and 33% of Unia Skierniewice's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ruch Chorzów has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.48 per game. Ruch Chorzów takes 15.2 shots per game, while Unia Skierniewice takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Ruch Chorzów leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Unia Skierniewice leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.17 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ruch Chorzów's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). For Unia Skierniewice, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ruch Chorzów sit higher in the table, in 12th place compared with Unia Skierniewice in 16th, and have collected 10 points from their last five matches, thanks to 3 wins and a draw. The hosts have conceded only 3 goals during this period, while Unia have allowed 6 goals in their last five games. At home, Ruch create a high volume of chances, averaging 21 shots and an xG of 2.16 per match—clearly more than Unia’s away xG of 1.16. The main concern for the Chorzów side is their finishing, as despite creating these opportunities, they average only 0.5 goals at home and have failed to score in 50% of such matches. Unia score an average of once per away game and convert their shots more efficiently, but their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match with an against xG of 1.61, which is why a slight advantage remains with the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score, as BTTS occurred in only 20% of Ruch’s last 5 matches and likewise in 20% of Unia’s games. Ruch scores just 0.75 goals per match this season and failed to score in 50% of its appearances, while its seasonal BTTS rate stands at only 25%, well below the league average of 52%. The hosts have also been considerably more solid defensively in their recent form, conceding an average of just 0.6 goals across their last five matches, compared with Unia’s 1.2. Unia has attacking potential, reflected in an xG of 1.77 over its last five matches, but Ruch allowed opponents an xG of 1.51 during that period. Therefore, a clean sheet for one of the teams is more likely than goals at both ends, supporting the BTTS - No / No Goal selection. This does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw; it means that at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest results point to a controlled goal profile: Ruch have scored 5 goals and conceded only 3 in their last five matches, averaging 1.6 total goals per game. Over the same period, Unia averaged 1.0 goals scored and 1.2 conceded per match, while only 40% of their games went over the 2.5-goal line. Ruch have not had a single match with at least 3 goals in their last five appearances, and both teams scored in just 20% of the matches in this run. Although the average xG figures for both teams suggest an attacking potential of around 1.6-1.8, their actual finishing efficiency remains limited, giving Under 3.5 a clear edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Ruch victory, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches and conceded just 0.2 goals per game before the break. The first halves of both teams are usually tight: Ruch average 0.6 goals in the opening 45 minutes, while Unia also average 0.6, and neither team has seen both sides score before half-time in any of their last five matches. After the break, however, Ruch have been in better overall form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and averaging 2.0 points per game, compared with Unia’s 1.4. The hosts also possess a clear creative edge, recording an xG of 1.64 and 4.75 shots on target per match, whereas Unia register 1.16 xG and 3.5 shots on target. The visitors have conceded an average of 1.2 goals per game across their last five appearances, increasing the likelihood of Ruch deciding an even contest after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
16Shots13
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
10Shots on target1
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
2.09xG1.3
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
4Corners3
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
53Dangerous attacks56
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
15Fouls15
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0Cards0
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0.5Goals scored / game0.83
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
1.17Goals allowed / game1.5
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
49%Average possession52%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
3.5Shots on target / game4.33
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.17Shots per game13.33
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
3.5Shots on target4.33
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
3.3%Shot conversion6.3%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
49%Possession52%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
1.74xG for1.48
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
1.42xG against1.67
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

Shooting quality

Ruch Chorzów: AttackingUnia Skierniewice: Balanced
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
Accuracy (shots on target)23%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.140.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ruch Chorzów is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Ruch Chorzów · 1.2 pts / game - Unia Skierniewice

Ruch Chorzów
LDWWL
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Unia Skierniewice
LWLWL
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Unia Skierniewice is 66% better for: goals scored per game.

0.5 goals / game - Ruch Chorzów · 0.83 goals / game - Unia Skierniewice

Ruch Chorzów is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.17 goals / game - Ruch Chorzów · 1.5 goals / game - Unia Skierniewice

Ruch Chorzów scoring profile: mixed

Ruch Chorzów scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while Unia Skierniewice keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

Unia Skierniewice scoring profile: strong

Unia Skierniewice scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Ruch Chorzów keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

3Goals scored (season)5
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
7Goals conceded (season)9
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
1.67Average goals per game2.33
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%2 goals17%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%3 goals0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%4 goals0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
50%2 goals50%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%3 goals33%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%4 goals0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%Scored in both halves0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
20%BTTS - last 520%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Unia Skierniewice is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Ruch Chorzów · 1.67 pts / game - Unia Skierniewice

Ruch Chorzów - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing
Unia Skierniewice - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.67
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0.33Average goals (1st half)1
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
83%No goal before half-time50%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per game (2nd half)0.5
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice
67%No goal after half-time83%
Ruch ChorzówUnia Skierniewice

Ruch Chorzów - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Unia Skierniewice - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ruch Chorzów - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.41.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Unia Skierniewice - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.40
Goals scored / game0.80.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+3-6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ruch Chorzów
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Unia Skierniewice
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ruch Chorzów

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
35%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Unia Skierniewice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Ruch ChorzówLigaUnia Skierniewice
Average goals per game▼ 1.672.62▼ 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 17%54%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%46%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 33%25%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 33%75%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%75%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ruch ChorzówGoalMichal Chrapek
  2. Unia SkierniewiceSubstitutionOn: Jan MierzwaOff: Kacper Kalisz
  3. Ruch ChorzówGoalShuma NagamatsuAssist: Patryk Szwedzik
  4. Unia SkierniewiceSubstitutionOn: Krzysztof ToporkiewiczOff: Bartosz Bida
  5. Unia SkierniewiceGoalSammy DudekAssist: Kamil Sabillo
  6. Unia SkierniewiceSubstitutionOn: Mateusz SzmydOff: Bartłomiej Eizenchart
  7. Ruch ChorzówSubstitutionOn: Filip WójcikOff: Martin Konczkowski
  8. Ruch ChorzówSubstitutionOn: Patryk SikoraOff: Michal Chrapek
  9. Ruch ChorzówGoalShuma Nagamatsu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Ruch Chorzów vs Unia Skierniewice?

The 1. Liga match finished Ruch Chorzów 3:1 Unia Skierniewice. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ruch Chorzów vs Unia Skierniewice?

Ruch Chorzów score 0.50 goals per game on average and Unia Skierniewice 0.83. The 1. Liga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Ruch Chorzów's matches and 33% of Unia Skierniewice's.

What form are Ruch Chorzów and Unia Skierniewice in?

Over the last 5 games Ruch Chorzów have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Unia Skierniewice 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ruch Chorzów vs Unia Skierniewice?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.