Rudar vs Bilje: match statistics
Rudar presents significantly better home form than Bilje does in away matches. The hosts have earned 1.6 points per match in the last five games, while the guests earned just 0.2 points, losing four of their last five meetings. Rudar has a positive goal difference at their own stadium (+1), whereas Bilje records a disastrous away record (-14 goals). The hosts have won 25% of home matches and failed to score in only 50% of cases, which speaks to their offensive efficiency relative to the opponent. Bilje concedes an average of 2.75 goals per away match, which, given Rudar's decent efficiency (average 1.25 goals per match at home), gives the hosts a clear advantage. xG statistics also favor Rudar (1.56 vs 1.25), confirming the higher quality of chances created. All these factors point to a probable victory for the hosts, although the weaker form in recent home matches (ldldwdwd) does not guarantee a certain result.
Rudar vs Bilje: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rudar played against Bilje in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 5:0.
Recent form
Rudar has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Bilje has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Rudar scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 1.35. Bilje scores 0.88 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 2.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Rudar's games and 53% of Bilje's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 41%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rudar has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.26 per game. Rudar takes 10.4 shots per game, while Bilje takes 10.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Rudar leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Bilje leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rudar's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Bilje, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. SNL games average 2.84 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rudar presents significantly better home form than Bilje does in away matches. The hosts have earned 1.6 points per match in the last five games, while the guests earned just 0.2 points, losing four of their last five meetings. Rudar has a positive goal difference at their own stadium (+1), whereas Bilje records a disastrous away record (-14 goals). The hosts have won 25% of home matches and failed to score in only 50% of cases, which speaks to their offensive efficiency relative to the opponent. Bilje concedes an average of 2.75 goals per away match, which, given Rudar's decent efficiency (average 1.25 goals per match at home), gives the hosts a clear advantage. xG statistics also favor Rudar (1.56 vs 1.25), confirming the higher quality of chances created. All these factors point to a probable victory for the hosts, although the weaker form in recent home matches (ldldwdwd) does not guarantee a certain result.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rudar | Bilje | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rudar is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Rudar · 0.2 pts / game - Bilje
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 60% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - Rudar · 0.88 goals / game - Bilje
Rudar is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.35 goals / game - Rudar · 1.65 goals / game - Bilje
Rudar scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Bilje keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).
Bilje scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rudar
Over / Under - Bilje
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudar is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / game - Rudar · 1.06 pts / game - Bilje
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Bilje - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -9 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rudar
Bilje
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudar | Liga | Bilje | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.76 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 54% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 30% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 79% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rudar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Bilje. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudar vs Bilje?
The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 5:0 Bilje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Bilje?
Rudar score 1.41 goals per game on average and Bilje 0.88. The 2. SNL average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Rudar's matches and 53% of Bilje's.
What form are Rudar and Bilje in?
Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Bilje 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Bilje?
The statistical background for Rudar vs Bilje — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.