Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 21 July 2026

Rudar vs Bilje: match statistics

Rudar crest
Rudar
5 : 0half-time 3:0
Bilje crest
Bilje
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Rudar presents significantly better home form than Bilje does in away matches. The hosts have earned 1.6 points per match in the last five games, while the guests earned just 0.2 points, losing four of their last five meetings. Rudar has a positive goal difference at their own stadium (+1), whereas Bilje records a disastrous away record (-14 goals). The hosts have won 25% of home matches and failed to score in only 50% of cases, which speaks to their offensive efficiency relative to the opponent. Bilje concedes an average of 2.75 goals per away match, which, given Rudar's decent efficiency (average 1.25 goals per match at home), gives the hosts a clear advantage. xG statistics also favor Rudar (1.56 vs 1.25), confirming the higher quality of chances created. All these factors point to a probable victory for the hosts, although the weaker form in recent home matches (ldldwdwd) does not guarantee a certain result.

Rudar vs Bilje: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rudar play Bilje in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Bilje: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Bilje scores 0.90 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rudar 53%, Bilje 43%. Over 2.5: Rudar 60%, Bilje 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Rudar has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.19. Rudar: 10.4 shots per match, Bilje: 9.1.

Match halves

Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Bilje: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). Bilje: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Rudar presents significantly better home form than Bilje does in away matches. The hosts have earned 1.6 points per match in the last five games, while the guests earned just 0.2 points, losing four of their last five meetings. Rudar has a positive goal difference at their own stadium (+1), whereas Bilje records a disastrous away record (-14 goals). The hosts have won 25% of home matches and failed to score in only 50% of cases, which speaks to their offensive efficiency relative to the opponent. Bilje concedes an average of 2.75 goals per away match, which, given Rudar's decent efficiency (average 1.25 goals per match at home), gives the hosts a clear advantage. xG statistics also favor Rudar (1.56 vs 1.25), confirming the higher quality of chances created. All these factors point to a probable victory for the hosts, although the weaker form in recent home matches (ldldwdwd) does not guarantee a certain result.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
RudarBilje
14Shots6
RudarBilje
8Shots on target2
RudarBilje
2.06xG1.03
RudarBilje
4Corners6
RudarBilje
85Dangerous attacks70
RudarBilje
-1Fouls-1
RudarBilje
-1Cards-1
RudarBilje

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.53Goals scored / match0.9
RudarBilje
1.3Goals conceded / match1.57
RudarBilje
50%Average possession44%
RudarBilje
4.4Shots on target / match3.57
RudarBilje

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.37Shots per match9.07
RudarBilje
4.4Shots on target3.57
RudarBilje
14.8%Shot conversion9.9%
RudarBilje
50%Possession44%
RudarBilje
1.51xG for1.19
RudarBilje
1.5xG against1.44
RudarBilje

Shooting quality

Rudar: Efficient finishingBilje: Balanced
RudarBilje
Accuracy (shots on target)42%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rudar is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Rudar · 0.6 pts / match - Bilje

Rudar
WWLDL
Season result split
30% W33% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-7-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Bilje
LLLWL
Season result split
30% W23% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rudar is 70% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Rudar · 0.9 goals / match - Bilje

Rudar is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Rudar · 1.57 goals / match - Bilje

Rudar scoring profile: very strong

Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Bilje keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Bilje scoring profile: mixed

Bilje scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

46Goals scored (season)27
RudarBilje
39Goals conceded (season)47
RudarBilje
2.83Average goals in match2.47
RudarBilje
9Goals scored (last 5)3
RudarBilje
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
RudarBilje

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal53%
RudarBilje
47%2 goals30%
RudarBilje
20%3 goals7%
RudarBilje
10%4 goals0%
RudarBilje

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal80%
RudarBilje
43%2 goals27%
RudarBilje
13%3 goals17%
RudarBilje
3%4 goals10%
RudarBilje

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time10%
RudarBilje
7%BTTS in both halves3%
RudarBilje
20%Scored in both halves13%
RudarBilje

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RudarBilje
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
RudarBilje
60%BTTS - last 520%
RudarBilje

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
RudarBilje
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
RudarBilje
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
RudarBilje

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
RudarBilje
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
RudarBilje
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
RudarBilje

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rudar is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Rudar · 0.97 pts / match - Bilje

Rudar - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing
Bilje - half-time state
17% leading47% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)0.97
RudarBilje
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.37
RudarBilje
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
RudarBilje
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.1
RudarBilje
57%Clean sheet before half-time53%
RudarBilje
57%No goal before half-time73%
RudarBilje

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)1.03
RudarBilje
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
RudarBilje
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
RudarBilje
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.37
RudarBilje
50%Clean sheet after half-time43%
RudarBilje
57%No goal after half-time60%
RudarBilje

Rudar - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bilje - second-half results

23% W33% R43% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Bilje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
9
8
16-30
9
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
10
7
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Bilje
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
5
10
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Bilje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

RudarLigaBilje
Average goals in match 2.832.82 2.47
Both teams scored 53%50% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%54% 43%
Clean sheets 30%28% 20%
Goal before half-time 67%74% 63%
Goal after half-time 70%81% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Rudar 0 - 0 - 1 Bilje. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Bilje
2 : 1
NK Rudar Velenje

FAQ

What was the result of Rudar vs Bilje?

The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 5:0 Bilje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Bilje?

Rudar score 1.53 goals per game on average and Bilje 0.90. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Rudar's matches and 43% of Bilje's.

What form are Rudar and Bilje in?

Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Bilje 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Bilje?

The statistical background for Rudar vs Bilje — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.