Rudar vs Dekani: match statistics
Rudar vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rudar play Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 15 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rudar 53%, Dekani 53%. Over 2.5: Rudar 60%, Dekani 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Rudar has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.32. Rudar: 10.4 shots per match, Dekani: 9.4.
Match halves
Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Rudar holds a clear advantage in home metrics: they average 1.79 goals and 5.08 shots on target per home match with a conversion rate of 17%, whereas Dekani average 0.64 goals and 3.36 shots on target away with a 7% conversion. The hosts’ defense looks more solid — Rudar concede 0.93 goals per home match and keep 43% clean sheets, while Dekani concede 1.50 goals on the road and have only a 7% clean sheet rate. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 8 goals, but Rudar conceded 5 compared to Dekani’s 8 and collected an average of 1.6 points per game versus the visitors’ 1.0. Over the season Rudar are 44-35 with a +12 home goal differential, while Dekani are 34-41 with a -12 away differential, which further supports the hosts. Considering the possession edge (53% vs 42%), lower share of matches without scoring (36% vs 57%) and higher xG for the hosts (1.59 vs 1.31), I tip a Rudar win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rudar | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dekani is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Rudar · 1.6 pts / match - Dekani
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Rudar · 1.33 goals / match - Dekani
Rudar is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Rudar · 1.53 goals / match - Dekani
Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rudar
Over / Under — Dekani
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudar is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Rudar · 1.07 pts / match - Dekani
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Dekani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rudar
Dekani
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudar | Liga | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.83 | 2.82 | • 2.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 28% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Rudar 1 - 0 - 0 Dekani. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudar vs Dekani?
The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 2:2 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Dekani?
Rudar score 1.53 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.33. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Rudar's matches and 53% of Dekani's.
What form are Rudar and Dekani in?
Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Dekani 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Dekani?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.