Rudar vs Dravinja: match statistics
Rudar vs Dravinja: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rudar play Dravinja in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Dravinja: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Dravinja scores 1.07 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rudar 53%, Dravinja 53%. Over 2.5: Rudar 60%, Dravinja 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Rudar has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.38. Rudar: 10.4 shots per match, Dravinja: 9.6.
Match halves
Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Dravinja: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). Dravinja: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I predict a home win (1). Rudar has a clear advantage in home metrics: an average of 1.75 goals scored per home match versus Dravinja’s 1.00 goals away, and the home side’s xG is 1.57 compared to the visitors’ 1.36 on the road. The hosts create more high-quality chances — 4.92 shots on target and 10.92 shots per home match with a conversion rate of 16%, versus Dravinja’s 3.58 on target and 10.5 shots with a 10% conversion. Defensively Rudar is superior: they concede 1.00 goal on average at home and record 42% clean sheets, while Dravinja concedes 1.83 goals away and has only 8% clean sheets; this season the visitors have conceded 40 goals versus Rudar’s 30. The last 5 matches are similar in goals scored (both 6), but Dravinja averages 1.6 points in their last five compared to Rudar’s 1.0, which narrows the home advantage and suggests the game could be close, although Rudar is more likely to win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rudar | Dravinja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dravinja is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Rudar · 2.6 pts / match - Dravinja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 43% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Rudar · 1.07 goals / match - Dravinja
Rudar is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Rudar · 1.47 goals / match - Dravinja
Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Dravinja keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
Dravinja scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rudar
Over / Under — Dravinja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudar is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Rudar · 1.07 pts / match - Dravinja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Dravinja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rudar
Dravinja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudar | Liga | Dravinja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.83 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 28% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Rudar 0 - 0 - 1 Dravinja. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudar vs Dravinja?
The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 1:1 Dravinja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Dravinja?
Rudar score 1.53 goals per game on average and Dravinja 1.07. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Rudar's matches and 53% of Dravinja's.
What form are Rudar and Dravinja in?
Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Dravinja 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Dravinja?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudar vs Dravinja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.