Rudeš vs Cibalia: match statistics
Rudeš vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rudeš played against Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Recent form
Rudeš has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Cibalia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Rudeš scores 1.37 goals per game and allows 0.83. Cibalia scores 1.47 and allows 0.93. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Rudeš's games and 47% of Cibalia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rudeš has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.39 per game. Rudeš takes 11.0 shots per game, while Cibalia takes 9.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Rudeš leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Cibalia leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rudeš's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For Cibalia, it is minutes 61-75 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Druga HNL games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rudeš, the table leader, has a clear home advantage: wins 73% of home matches, records only 7% defeats and concedes an average of 0.53 goals per game with 60% clean sheets. Cibalia, fourth in the table, performs worse away — wins 29% of matches, loses 50% and concedes an average of 1.29 goals per game with 36% clean sheets. In attack Rudeš generates 1.61 xG at home and 12.73 shots per game (4.47 on target), while Cibalia produces 1.31 xG and 9.77 shots (3.69 on target) away, indicating clearly better quality and quantity of chances for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Rudeš has 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 pts per game), Cibalia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 pts per game), so form is similar, but Rudeš’s home goal difference (+14) versus Cibalia’s -3 away further confirms the home advantage. Based on this, I forecast a Rudeš victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back No BTTS because Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 53% of home matches and concedes only 0.67 goals at home on average, while Cibalia scores 1.07 goals away on average. Home BTTS rate is 40% vs 57% for the visitors, but the last 5 games for both teams show BTTS at 60% — a mixed signal, though Rudeš’s defense has the edge. xG indicates Rudeš has xG of 1.51 with Cibalia conceding xG 1.30 (around 1.4 expected goals for the home side), while Cibalia has xG 1.31 with Rudeš conceding xG 1.22 (close to 1.3 for the away side). Additionally Rudeš has higher finishing efficiency (conversion 18% vs 12%) and in the last 5 matches conceded only 3 goals (0.6 per match) versus Cibalia’s 5 conceded (1.0 per match), which emphasizes the home advantage and supports a No BTTS / No Goal scenario (clean sheet expected).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated expected goals total approximately 2.68: home side Rudeš ~1.41 (home xG 1.51 vs xG conceded by Cibalia 1.30) and visitors Cibalia ~1.27 (away xG 1.31 vs xG conceded by Rudeš 1.22). Rudeš at home averages 10.33 shots per game with an 18% conversion rate (equating to ~1.87 goals at home), Cibalia average 9.77 shots with a 12% conversion (~1.17 goals), and in the last 5 matches both teams scored 9 goals each (avg 1.8). Season Over 1.5 rates are 87% for Rudeš and 57% for Cibalia; with a combined expected 2.68 goals I estimate the probability of at least 2 goals at about 75%. I assess Over 2.5 at ~50% and Over 3.5 at ~28%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — I recommend backing Over 1.5 due to the higher home scoring efficiency (1.87 goals at home, 18% conversion) and moderate expected contribution from Cibalia (1.27 expected goals).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is 1/1 (home team leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time). Rudeš led at the break in 40% of their matches and overall wins 67% of games, which suggests that a lead at the break often converts into a victory. The home side scores an average of 0.67 goals by Half-Time and concedes only 0.27, while after the break they average 1.2 goals at home, with at least one goal in 93% of their home matches in the second half, increasing their chances of maintaining or extending the lead. Cibalia are losing at the break in 43% of matches and concede an average of 0.71 goals by Half-Time, and their away wins are only 29%, so they have limited turnaround potential. Therefore the 1/1 scenario received the highest weighting (34%), while X/1 (28%) is a realistic alternative due to the high proportion of draws at Half-Time (47%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rudeš | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rudeš is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Rudeš · 2 pts / game - Cibalia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cibalia is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.37 goals / game - Rudeš · 1.47 goals / game - Cibalia
Rudeš is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Rudeš · 0.93 goals / game - Cibalia
Rudeš scores in 87% of games (26 of 30 meczów), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 47% (14 of 30 meczów).
Cibalia scores in 83% of games (25 of 30 meczów), while Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 57% (17 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rudeš
Over / Under - Cibalia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudeš is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.93 pts / game - Rudeš · 1.47 pts / game - Cibalia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudeš - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Cibalia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rudeš
Cibalia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudeš | Liga | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.20 | 2.27 | ▲ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 43% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 33% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Rudeš's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cibalia. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudeš vs Cibalia?
The Druga HNL match finished Rudeš 2:3 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rudeš and Cibalia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudeš won 1, Cibalia won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudeš vs Cibalia?
Rudeš score 1.37 goals per game on average and Cibalia 1.47. The Druga HNL average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Rudeš's matches and 47% of Cibalia's.
What form are Rudeš and Cibalia in?
Over the last 5 games Rudeš have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Cibalia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudeš vs Cibalia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudeš vs Cibalia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


