Rudeš vs Cibalia: match statistics
Rudeš vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rudeš play Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match date is 15 May 2026 at 15:45. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Rudeš: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cibalia: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rudeš scores 1.48 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Cibalia scores 1.55 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.34 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rudeš 42%, Cibalia 52%. Over 2.5: Rudeš 39%, Cibalia 52%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Rudeš has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.39. Rudeš: 11.0 shots per match, Cibalia: 9.6.
Match halves
Rudeš: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.61. Cibalia: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Rudeš: 31-45+ (13 goals). Cibalia: 61-75 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Druga HNL: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Rudeš, the table leader, has a clear home advantage: wins 73% of home matches, records only 7% defeats and concedes an average of 0.53 goals per game with 60% clean sheets. Cibalia, fourth in the table, performs worse away — wins 29% of matches, loses 50% and concedes an average of 1.29 goals per game with 36% clean sheets. In attack Rudeš generates 1.61 xG at home and 12.73 shots per game (4.47 on target), while Cibalia produces 1.31 xG and 9.77 shots (3.69 on target) away, indicating clearly better quality and quantity of chances for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Rudeš has 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 pts per game), Cibalia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 pts per game), so form is similar, but Rudeš’s home goal difference (+14) versus Cibalia’s -3 away further confirms the home advantage. Based on this, I forecast a Rudeš victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rudeš | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cibalia is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.48 goals / match - Rudeš · 1.55 goals / match - Cibalia
Rudeš is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.88 goals / match - Rudeš · 1 goals / match - Cibalia
Rudeš scores in 88% of matches (29 of 33 matches), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 42% (14 of 33 matches).
Cibalia scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 55% (18 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rudeš
Over / Under — Cibalia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudeš is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.88 pts / match - Rudeš · 1.55 pts / match - Cibalia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudeš - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cibalia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rudeš
Cibalia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudeš | Liga | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.36 | 2.34 | ▲ 2.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 44% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 44% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 55% | 31% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Rudeš 1 - 1 - 0 Cibalia. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudeš vs Cibalia?
The Druga HNL match finished Rudeš 2:3 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rudeš and Cibalia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudeš won 1, Cibalia won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudeš vs Cibalia?
Rudeš score 1.48 goals per game on average and Cibalia 1.55. The Druga HNL average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Rudeš's matches and 52% of Cibalia's.
What form are Rudeš and Cibalia in?
Over the last 5 games Rudeš have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cibalia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudeš vs Cibalia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudeš vs Cibalia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.