RWDM vs AS Eupen: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which suggests a draw. RWDM shows poor home form with just 23% of wins at home and a goal difference of -4, but their last five overall matches show improvement (1.6 points per match). AS Eupen has a better away record (33% wins, goal difference 0) and an impressive 33% clean sheets away, but their recent form is concerning (only 1 point per match in the last 5 matches). Both teams have identical shot conversion (14%) and similar average xG, confirming the balance of power. Considering both teams' high draw percentages (23% for RWDM at home, 25% for Eupen away) and the visitors' decline in form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.
RWDM vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RWDM played against AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on March 1, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
RWDM has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. AS Eupen has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
RWDM scores 1.52 goals per game and allows 1.64. AS Eupen scores 1.33 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of RWDM's games and 58% of AS Eupen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 46%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
RWDM has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.16 per game. RWDM takes 12.1 shots per game, while AS Eupen takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
RWDM leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. AS Eupen leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
RWDM's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For AS Eupen, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which suggests a draw. RWDM shows poor home form with just 23% of wins at home and a goal difference of -4, but their last five overall matches show improvement (1.6 points per match). AS Eupen has a better away record (33% wins, goal difference 0) and an impressive 33% clean sheets away, but their recent form is concerning (only 1 point per match in the last 5 matches). Both teams have identical shot conversion (14%) and similar average xG, confirming the balance of power. Considering both teams' high draw percentages (23% for RWDM at home, 25% for Eupen away) and the visitors' decline in form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RWDM | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
RWDM is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - RWDM · 1 pts / game - AS Eupen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.52 goals / game - RWDM · 1.33 goals / game - AS Eupen
AS Eupen is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.64 goals / game - RWDM · 1.17 goals / game - AS Eupen
RWDM scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 meczów), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).
AS Eupen scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RWDM
Over / Under - AS Eupen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 28%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AS Eupen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RWDM
AS Eupen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RWDM | Liga | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.16 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 78% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from RWDM's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against AS Eupen. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RWDM vs AS Eupen?
The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:2 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs AS Eupen?
RWDM score 1.52 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.33. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 56% of RWDM's matches and 58% of AS Eupen's.
What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in?
Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and AS Eupen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs AS Eupen?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.