Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 06, 2026

RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Lierse Kempenzonen crest
Lierse Kempenzonen
135%(1.83)
X35%(3.60)
230%(3.50)

Statistical analysis points to an evenly matched contest between teams of similar potential. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 21% win rate on their own ground and a goal difference of -4, conceding an average of 1.93 goals per match. Lierse Kempenzonen also holds an identical goal difference of -4 in away matches but shows better form in their last five fixtures (1.8 PPG vs 1.0 PPG for the hosts). The visitors score an average of 1 goal per away game with a 29% clean sheet rate, suggesting solid defensive organization. Considering RWDM's high draw percentage at home (29%) and the even quality of both teams according to xG metrics, the most probable scenario is a share of the points. The visitors' recent form (3 wins in 5 matches) holds a slight edge over the hosts, but the home advantage could offset this difference.

RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

RWDM played against Lierse Kempenzonen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

RWDM has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Lierse Kempenzonen has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

RWDM scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.64. Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.14 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of RWDM's games and 50% of Lierse Kempenzonen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 46%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Lierse Kempenzonen has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.34 per game. RWDM takes 11.8 shots per game, while Lierse Kempenzonen takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

RWDM leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Lierse Kempenzonen leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.43 after halftime.

When the teams score

RWDM's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Lierse Kempenzonen, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to an evenly matched contest between teams of similar potential. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 21% win rate on their own ground and a goal difference of -4, conceding an average of 1.93 goals per match. Lierse Kempenzonen also holds an identical goal difference of -4 in away matches but shows better form in their last five fixtures (1.8 PPG vs 1.0 PPG for the hosts). The visitors score an average of 1 goal per away game with a 29% clean sheet rate, suggesting solid defensive organization. Considering RWDM's high draw percentage at home (29%) and the even quality of both teams according to xG metrics, the most probable scenario is a share of the points. The visitors' recent form (3 wins in 5 matches) holds a slight edge over the hosts, but the home advantage could offset this difference.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
15Shots9
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
6Shots on target4
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.67xG1.17
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
2Corners8
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
41Dangerous attacks44
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
11Fouls15
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4Cards1
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.57Goals scored / game1.14
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.64Goals allowed / game1.36
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
49%Average possession47%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4.39Shots on target / game3.79
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.75Shots per game11.93
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4.39Shots on target3.79
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
13.4%Shot conversion9.6%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
49%Possession47%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.34xG for1.39
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.52xG against1.71
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingLierse Kempenzonen: Balanced
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - RWDM · 1.8 pts / game - Lierse Kempenzonen

RWDM
LDDWL
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-12
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Lierse Kempenzonen
LWWWL
Season result split
32% W21% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-13
1.18 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 38% better for: goals scored per game.

1.57 goals / game - RWDM · 1.14 goals / game - Lierse Kempenzonen

Lierse Kempenzonen is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.64 goals / game - RWDM · 1.36 goals / game - Lierse Kempenzonen

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 79% of games (22 of 28 meczów), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: strong

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 meczów).

44Goals scored (season)32
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
46Goals conceded (season)38
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
3.21Average goals per game2.5
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
8Goals scored (last 5)8
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal68%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
50%2 goals29%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
21%3 goals14%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4%4 goals4%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal71%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
54%2 goals46%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
29%3 goals11%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
7%4 goals7%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
Lierse Kempenzonen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 28 meczów
54%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time18%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
14%BTTS in both halves11%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
36%Scored in both halves21%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
80%BTTS - last 580%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / game - RWDM · 1.54 pts / game - Lierse Kempenzonen

RWDM - half-time state
32% leading39% draw29% trailing
Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
39% leading36% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per game (1st half)1.54
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.71
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.25
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
61%Clean sheet before half-time61%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%No goal before half-time46%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per game (2nd half)0.82
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.25
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%Clean sheet after half-time39%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%No goal after half-time64%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

RWDM - second-half results

32% W32% R36% P
38
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

11% W50% R39% P
43
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 32%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

RWDM - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.20
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.600.60
Goals scored / game1.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
7
6
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
5
4
61-75
11
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaLierse Kempenzonen
Average goals per game 3.212.80 2.50
Both teams scored 57%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%53% 46%
Clean sheets 25%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 86%78% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardAlexandre Stanic
  2. RWDMYellow cardTibo Persyn
  3. RWDMYellow cardAïman Maurer
  4. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Toni Lun BončinaOff: Daan De Peuter
  5. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Ilyes ZianiOff: Jacob Montes
  6. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Noah DodeigneOff: Aïman Maurer
  7. Lierse KempenzonenGoalCedric Jan Van Meirvenne
  8. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Kwasi PokuOff: Oskar Szulc
  9. RWDMYellow cardIlyes Ziani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from RWDM's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Lierse Kempenzonen. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

KSK Lierse Kempenzonen
2 : 0
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:1 Lierse Kempenzonen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen?

RWDM score 1.57 goals per game on average and Lierse Kempenzonen 1.14. The First Division B average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 57% of RWDM's matches and 50% of Lierse Kempenzonen's.

What form are RWDM and Lierse Kempenzonen in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lierse Kempenzonen 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.