RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates very balanced odds for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a -3 goal difference, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse shows a more solid performance away from home with a 42% win rate and a balanced goal difference (0). The recent form of both teams is similar (RWDM: 1.4 PPG, Lokeren-Temse: 1.2 PPG), and the xG statistics are almost identical, further confirming the balanced nature of this fixture. Lokeren-Temse's high draw percentage away from home (17%) combined with RWDM's struggles to secure points at home make a share of the points seem the most logical scenario.
RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RWDM played against Lokeren-Temse in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on February 14, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
RWDM has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Lokeren-Temse has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
RWDM scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.65. Lokeren-Temse scores 1.35 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of RWDM's games and 70% of Lokeren-Temse's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 48%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lokeren-Temse has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.39 per game. RWDM takes 12.3 shots per game, while Lokeren-Temse takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
RWDM leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Lokeren-Temse leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
RWDM's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Lokeren-Temse, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates very balanced odds for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a -3 goal difference, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse shows a more solid performance away from home with a 42% win rate and a balanced goal difference (0). The recent form of both teams is similar (RWDM: 1.4 PPG, Lokeren-Temse: 1.2 PPG), and the xG statistics are almost identical, further confirming the balanced nature of this fixture. Lokeren-Temse's high draw percentage away from home (17%) combined with RWDM's struggles to secure points at home make a share of the points seem the most logical scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RWDM | Lokeren-Temse | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
RWDM is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - RWDM · 1.2 pts / game - Lokeren-Temse
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.57 goals / game - RWDM · 1.35 goals / game - Lokeren-Temse
Lokeren-Temse is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.65 goals / game - RWDM · 1.35 goals / game - Lokeren-Temse
RWDM scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
Lokeren-Temse scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RWDM
Over / Under - Lokeren-Temse
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / game - RWDM · 1.04 pts / game - Lokeren-Temse
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 30%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Lokeren-Temse - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RWDM
Lokeren-Temse
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RWDM | Liga | Lokeren-Temse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.22 | 2.73 | • 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | • 52% | 53% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 50% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 77% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from RWDM's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Lokeren-Temse. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?
The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:2 Lokeren-Temse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?
RWDM score 1.57 goals per game on average and Lokeren-Temse 1.35. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 52% of RWDM's matches and 70% of Lokeren-Temse's.
What form are RWDM and Lokeren-Temse in?
Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lokeren-Temse 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?
The statistical background for RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.