RWDM vs RSC Anderlecht II: match statistics
RWDM vs RSC Anderlecht II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RWDM play RSC Anderlecht II in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. RSC Anderlecht II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. RSC Anderlecht II scores 1.44 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RWDM 63%, RSC Anderlecht II 56%. Over 2.5: RWDM 59%, RSC Anderlecht II 63%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
RSC Anderlecht II has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.33. RWDM: 11.5 shots per match, RSC Anderlecht II: 13.7.
Match halves
RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84. RSC Anderlecht II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). RSC Anderlecht II: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I back a RWDM win. In the last 5 matches RWDM scored 9 goals and average 1.0 point per game, while RSC Anderlecht II have only 4 goals and 0.2 points per game. RWDM also display better home shot efficiency: on average 4.8 shots on target from 12.13 attempts per match with a 13% conversion rate, versus the visitors’ 4.27 on target from 12.4 attempts and 12% conversion. Both teams are defensively vulnerable (home side concedes 1.87 goals at home, visitors concede 1.8 on the road), but Anderlecht II show worse expected defensive metrics — average xG against 1.82 compared to 1.5 for RWDM, and the visitors conceded 14 goals in their last 5 matches. Additionally Anderlecht II are winless in their last five (0-1-4), while RWDM are 1-2-2, favoring the home side in form and chance creation quality. Based on these figures I estimate a 55% probability for a home win, 25% for a draw and 20% for an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RWDM | RSC Anderlecht II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RWDM is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - RWDM · 0.6 pts / match - RSC Anderlecht II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - RWDM · 1.44 goals / match - RSC Anderlecht II
RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while RSC Anderlecht II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).
RSC Anderlecht II scores in 72% of matches (23 of 32 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — RWDM
Over / Under — RSC Anderlecht II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - RWDM · 1.13 pts / match - RSC Anderlecht II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RSC Anderlecht II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RWDM
RSC Anderlecht II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RWDM | Liga | RSC Anderlecht II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.25 | 2.84 | ▲ 3.16 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 55% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 54% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 79% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: RWDM 0 - 1 - 0 RSC Anderlecht II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of RWDM vs RSC Anderlecht II?
The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:1 RSC Anderlecht II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs RSC Anderlecht II?
RWDM score 1.56 goals per game on average and RSC Anderlecht II 1.44. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of RWDM's matches and 56% of RSC Anderlecht II's.
What form are RWDM and RSC Anderlecht II in?
Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RSC Anderlecht II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs RSC Anderlecht II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.