Denmark - SuperligaData current as of 17 July 2026

SønderjyskE vs Silkeborg: match statistics

SønderjyskE crest
SønderjyskE
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Silkeborg crest
Silkeborg
155%(1.97)
X25%(3.80)
220%(3.30)

SønderjyskE displays solid home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference of +6 at their own stadium. The hosts have earned 10 points in their last five matches (2 PPG), which contrasts sharply with Silkeborg's dismal form, having managed only 0.4 points per game in the same period. Silkeborg's away statistics are dismal – a 56% loss rate, zero clean sheets, and a negative goal difference of -11, conceding an average of 2.56 goals per match. Furthermore, the visitors have failed to win any of their last five matches and have scored only one goal during this period. xG analysis also favors the hosts (1.43 vs 1.25 for the visitors), and SønderjyskE's home efficiency combined with Silkeborg's away form crisis point towards a likely home victory.

SønderjyskE vs Silkeborg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SønderjyskE play Silkeborg in Superliga (Denmark). The match date is 16 February 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

SønderjyskE: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Silkeborg: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

SønderjyskE scores 1.38 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Silkeborg scores 1.28 and concedes 2.09. League average: 3.10 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SønderjyskE 56%, Silkeborg 56%. Over 2.5: SønderjyskE 56%, Silkeborg 66%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

SønderjyskE has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.33. SønderjyskE: 12.1 shots per match, Silkeborg: 11.4.

Match halves

SønderjyskE: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.88. Silkeborg: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

SønderjyskE: 76-90+ (15 goals). Silkeborg: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Superliga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

SønderjyskE displays solid home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference of +6 at their own stadium. The hosts have earned 10 points in their last five matches (2 PPG), which contrasts sharply with Silkeborg's dismal form, having managed only 0.4 points per game in the same period. Silkeborg's away statistics are dismal – a 56% loss rate, zero clean sheets, and a negative goal difference of -11, conceding an average of 2.56 goals per match. Furthermore, the visitors have failed to win any of their last five matches and have scored only one goal during this period. xG analysis also favors the hosts (1.43 vs 1.25 for the visitors), and SønderjyskE's home efficiency combined with Silkeborg's away form crisis point towards a likely home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
SønderjyskESilkeborg
16Shots9
SønderjyskESilkeborg
6Shots on target3
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.97xG0.95
SønderjyskESilkeborg
3Corners3
SønderjyskESilkeborg
74Dangerous attacks22
SønderjyskESilkeborg
9Fouls9
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1Cards4
SønderjyskESilkeborg

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.38Goals scored / match1.28
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.53Goals conceded / match2.09
SønderjyskESilkeborg
44%Average possession49%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
4.13Shots on target / match4.56
SønderjyskESilkeborg

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.06Shots per match11.44
SønderjyskESilkeborg
4.13Shots on target4.56
SønderjyskESilkeborg
11.4%Shot conversion11.2%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
44%Possession49%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.36xG for1.33
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.67xG against1.9
SønderjyskESilkeborg

Shooting quality

SønderjyskE: BalancedSilkeborg: Balanced
SønderjyskESilkeborg
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Silkeborg is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - SønderjyskE · 1.8 pts / match - Silkeborg

SønderjyskE
LWLWL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-12
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Silkeborg
WWWLL
Season result split
31% W19% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-16
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-9
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 2.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SønderjyskE is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - SønderjyskE · 1.28 goals / match - Silkeborg

SønderjyskE is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - SønderjyskE · 2.09 goals / match - Silkeborg

SønderjyskE scoring profile: very strong

SønderjyskE scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 32 matches).

Silkeborg scoring profile: strong

Silkeborg scores in 63% of matches (20 of 32 matches), while SønderjyskE keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

44Goals scored (season)41
SønderjyskESilkeborg
49Goals conceded (season)67
SønderjyskESilkeborg
2.91Average goals in match3.38
SønderjyskESilkeborg
7Goals scored (last 5)8
SønderjyskESilkeborg
8Goals conceded (last 5)11
SønderjyskESilkeborg

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal63%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
47%2 goals41%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
13%3 goals22%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
0%4 goals3%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal91%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
47%2 goals59%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
13%3 goals28%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
9%4 goals19%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time28%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
6%BTTS in both halves13%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
25%Scored in both halves25%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
60%BTTS - last 560%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time28%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Silkeborg is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - SønderjyskE · 1.13 pts / match - Silkeborg

SønderjyskE - half-time state
19% leading50% draw31% trailing
Silkeborg - half-time state
28% leading28% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.13
SønderjyskESilkeborg
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.72
SønderjyskESilkeborg
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.81
SønderjyskESilkeborg
53%Clean sheet before half-time34%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
63%No goal before half-time50%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.13
SønderjyskESilkeborg
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
SønderjyskESilkeborg
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)1
SønderjyskESilkeborg
1.72Average goals (2nd half)1.56
SønderjyskESilkeborg
50%Clean sheet after half-time34%
SønderjyskESilkeborg
34%No goal after half-time63%
SønderjyskESilkeborg

SønderjyskE - second-half results

41% W25% R34% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Silkeborg - second-half results

31% W19% R50% P
36
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SønderjyskE - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Silkeborg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SønderjyskE
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
9
31-45
8
13
46-60
5
6
61-75
15
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Silkeborg
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
8
12
16-30
8
14
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
12
61-75
10
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SønderjyskE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Silkeborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

SønderjyskELigaSilkeborg
Average goals in match 2.913.10 3.38
Both teams scored 56%60% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%61% 66%
Clean sheets 28%23% 9%
Goal before half-time 63%74% 88%
Goal after half-time 84%79% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: SønderjyskE 1 - 0 - 0 Silkeborg. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Silkeborg IF
0 : 2
Sønderjysk Elitesport Fodbold

FAQ

What was the result of SønderjyskE vs Silkeborg?

The Superliga match finished SønderjyskE 2:1 Silkeborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SønderjyskE vs Silkeborg?

SønderjyskE score 1.38 goals per game on average and Silkeborg 1.28. The Superliga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 56% of SønderjyskE's matches and 56% of Silkeborg's.

What form are SønderjyskE and Silkeborg in?

Over the last 5 games SønderjyskE have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Silkeborg 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SønderjyskE vs Silkeborg?

The statistical background for SønderjyskE vs Silkeborg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.