Sabah vs Qabala: match statistics
Sabah is the clear favorite in this fixture, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 16 wins, 5 draws, and only 1 defeat. The hosts display dominant form at their home stadium with a 73% home win rate, scoring an average of 1.82 goals while conceding merely 0.45 goals per match. Qabala sits in 10th position with very poor away results – just a 9% win rate, 64% loss rate, and a staggering 64% FTS% (Failed to Score). The gap in quality between the teams is massive, which is confirmed by xG stats: Sabah generates an average of 2.07 xG in home matches, whereas Qabala manages just 1.1 xG on the road. Furthermore, the hosts are on an excellent unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (3 wins, 2 draws), while the visitors have picked up only 0.6 PPG in their last five outings. All indicators point decisively towards a comfortable victory for Sabah.
Sabah vs Qabala: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sabah played against Qabala in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The game was played on March 10, 2026. Final score: 7:1.
Recent form
Sabah has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Qabala has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Sabah scores 2.05 goals per game and allows 0.68. Qabala scores 0.86 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Sabah's games and 36% of Qabala's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 41%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sabah has the higher season xG average, 1.82 to 1.20 per game. Sabah takes 13.6 shots per game, while Qabala takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Sabah leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.09 goals per game after halftime. Qabala leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sabah's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). For Qabala, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premyer Liqası games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sabah is the clear favorite in this fixture, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 16 wins, 5 draws, and only 1 defeat. The hosts display dominant form at their home stadium with a 73% home win rate, scoring an average of 1.82 goals while conceding merely 0.45 goals per match. Qabala sits in 10th position with very poor away results – just a 9% win rate, 64% loss rate, and a staggering 64% FTS% (Failed to Score). The gap in quality between the teams is massive, which is confirmed by xG stats: Sabah generates an average of 2.07 xG in home matches, whereas Qabala manages just 1.1 xG on the road. Furthermore, the hosts are on an excellent unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (3 wins, 2 draws), while the visitors have picked up only 0.6 PPG in their last five outings. All indicators point decisively towards a comfortable victory for Sabah.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sabah | Qabala | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sabah is 550% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Sabah · 0.4 pts / game - Qabala
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sabah is 138% better for: goals scored per game.
2.05 goals / game - Sabah · 0.86 goals / game - Qabala
Sabah is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.68 goals / game - Sabah · 1.32 goals / game - Qabala
Sabah scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Qabala keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).
Qabala scores in 45% of games (10 of 22 meczów), while Sabah keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sabah
Over / Under - Qabala
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sabah is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.95 pts / game - Sabah · 1 pts / game - Qabala
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sabah - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Qabala - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sabah
Qabala
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).
Teams vs league
| Sabah | Liga | Qabala | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.73 | 2.46 | ▼ 2.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 43% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 34% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 65% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Sabah's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Qabala. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sabah vs Qabala?
The Premyer Liqası match finished Sabah 7:1 Qabala. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sabah and Qabala?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sabah won 2, Qabala won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sabah vs Qabala?
Sabah score 2.05 goals per game on average and Qabala 0.86. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sabah's matches and 36% of Qabala's.
What form are Sabah and Qabala in?
Over the last 5 games Sabah have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Qabala 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sabah vs Qabala?
The statistical background for Sabah vs Qabala — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.