Safa vs Jwaya: match statistics
Safa vs Jwaya: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Safa played against Jwaya in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on December 21, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Safa has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Jwaya has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Safa scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 0.75. Jwaya scores 1.89 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Safa's games and 11% of Jwaya's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 33%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Jwaya has the higher season xG average, 1.12 to 0.74 per game. Safa takes 2.8 shots per game, while Jwaya takes 2.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Safa leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Jwaya leads at halftime in 44% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Safa's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Jwaya, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Lebanese Premier League games average 2.26 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Safa | Jwaya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.10 | 3.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Jwaya is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Safa · 2 pts / game - Jwaya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Jwaya is 37% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Safa · 1.89 goals / game - Jwaya
Jwaya is 127% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Safa · 0.33 goals / game - Jwaya
Safa scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 meczów), while Jwaya keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 meczów).
Jwaya scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 meczów), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Safa
Over / Under - Jwaya
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jwaya is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Safa · 1.89 pts / game - Jwaya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Safa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Jwaya - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Safa
Jwaya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Safa | Liga | Jwaya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.13 | 2.26 | • 2.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 38% | 32% | ▼ 11% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 42% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 42% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 25% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 74% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Safa vs Jwaya?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Safa 0:1 Jwaya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Safa vs Jwaya?
Safa score 1.38 goals per game on average and Jwaya 1.89. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Safa's matches and 11% of Jwaya's.
What form are Safa and Jwaya in?
Over the last 5 games Safa have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Jwaya 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Safa vs Jwaya?
The statistical background for Safa vs Jwaya — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.