Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of October 15, 2026

Safa vs Turan: match statistics

Safa crest
Safa
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Turan crest
Turan

Safa vs Turan: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Safa played against Turan in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Safa has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Turan has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Safa scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 1.83. Turan scores 1.00 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 17% of Safa's games and 33% of Turan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Turan has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 0.89 per game. Safa takes 6.2 shots per game, while Turan takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Safa leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Turan leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Safa's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Turan, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premyer Liqası games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Turan sit 4th and have recorded 3 wins in six matches, while tenth-placed Safa have won only once and suffered 5 defeats. In their last five games, the hosts have lost 4 times and conceded 9 goals, whereas the visitors have suffered just one defeat and conceded 4. Safa have yet to score at home and concede an average of 2 goals per match; Turan average 1 goal away, although they are still without an away win. The visitors’ superior chance quality also supports their case: their away xG is 1.79, compared with the hosts’ 0.92 at home, while they allow opponents an xG of 0.86, versus Safa’s 2.04. Turan’s lack of an away win increases the likelihood of a draw, but the gap in finishing and chance creation favors the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Safa’s lack of scoring output: they have averaged just 0.4 goals across their last 5 matches, with an xG of 0.98. Turan conceded an average of 0.8 goals over that period, so a goal from the hosts is not guaranteed, even though the visitors have yet to keep a clean sheet away from home. On the other hand, Turan average 1.79 xG and 5.5 shots on target per match, while Safa conceded 1.8 goals across their last 5 games, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring. BTTS - Yes landed in 20% of Safa’s last 5 matches and 40% of Turan’s, so the marginally more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: none of Safa’s matches in the season sample went over this line, while Turan’s did so in 50% of games. Safa averages 1.0 goals per match, dropping to just 0.4 across its last five, which limits the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Turan creates more chances, with an average xG of 1.79 compared with Safa’s 1.45, and could exploit the hosts’ recent defensive decline, as they have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches. Even so, Over 2.5 goals has landed in just 40% of both teams’ last five matches, and the combined forecast of 2.45 goals gives Under 3.5 a clearer edge than the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely start to the match: in their last five games, Safa went into the break level on three occasions, while Turan did so four times. Over this period, Safa failed to score in the first half, whereas Turan averaged just 0.2 goals before the break. After half-time, the advantage shifts to the visitors: they averaged 0.8 goals in the second half across their last five matches, while the hosts conceded 1.2. Turan averaged 1.6 points per game in these five matches, compared with Safa’s 0.6, strengthening the case for an away win after an evenly matched first half. However, the X/2 pick is not a certainty, as Safa have conceded just 0.25 goals per game at home so far and have yet to lose.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
SafaTuran
6Shots14
SafaTuran
3Shots on target5
SafaTuran
1.17xG2.09
SafaTuran
5Corners4
SafaTuran
80Dangerous attacks118
SafaTuran
11Fouls13
SafaTuran
3Cards1
SafaTuran

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.33Goals scored / game1
SafaTuran
1.83Goals allowed / game0.67
SafaTuran
39%Average possession49%
SafaTuran
3Shots on target / game4.5
SafaTuran

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.17Shots per game12.83
SafaTuran
3Shots on target4.5
SafaTuran
5.4%Shot conversion7.8%
SafaTuran
39%Possession49%
SafaTuran
0.89xG for1.56
SafaTuran
1.97xG against0.82
SafaTuran

Shooting quality

Safa: BalancedTuran: Balanced
SafaTuran
Accuracy (shots on target)49%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.110.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Turan is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Safa · 1.6 pts / game - Turan

Safa
WLLLL
Season result split
17% W0% D83% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-5
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Turan
DLWDW
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Turan is 203% better for: goals scored per game.

0.33 goals / game - Safa · 1 goals / game - Turan

Turan is 173% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.83 goals / game - Safa · 0.67 goals / game - Turan

Safa scoring profile: more difficult

Safa scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 games), while Turan keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).

Turan scoring profile: very strong

Turan scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).

2Goals scored (season)6
SafaTuran
11Goals conceded (season)4
SafaTuran
2.17Average goals per game1.67
SafaTuran
2Goals scored (last 5)5
SafaTuran
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
SafaTuran

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal67%
SafaTuran
0%2 goals33%
SafaTuran
0%3 goals0%
SafaTuran
0%4 goals0%
SafaTuran

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal50%
SafaTuran
50%2 goals17%
SafaTuran
33%3 goals0%
SafaTuran
17%4 goals0%
SafaTuran

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
SafaTuran
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SafaTuran
0%Scored in both halves17%
SafaTuran

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
SafaTuran
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SafaTuran
20%BTTS - last 540%
SafaTuran

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
SafaTuran
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
SafaTuran
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SafaTuran

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
SafaTuran
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
SafaTuran
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
SafaTuran

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Turan is 134% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - Safa · 1.17 pts / game - Turan

Safa - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Turan - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1.17
SafaTuran
0Goals scored (1st half)0.33
SafaTuran
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
SafaTuran
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.67
SafaTuran
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
SafaTuran
100%No goal before half-time67%
SafaTuran

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per game (2nd half)1.83
SafaTuran
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
SafaTuran
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
SafaTuran
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1
SafaTuran
17%Clean sheet after half-time67%
SafaTuran
67%No goal after half-time50%
SafaTuran

Safa - second-half results

17% W0% D83% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Turan - second-half results

50% W33% D17% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Safa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game0.61.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Turan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.00
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Safa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Turan
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
23%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Turan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

SafaLigaTuran
Average goals per game▼ 2.172.46▼ 1.67
Both teams scored▼ 17%44%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%44%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 17%33%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%62%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%79%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.03
Away goals / game
+40%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TuranYellow cardSteeve Beusnard
  2. SafaYellow cardMaudo Lamine Jarjué
  3. SafaYellow cardChristopher Mamengi
  4. SafaSubstitutionOn: İsmayıl ZülfuqarlıOff: Christopher Mamengi
  5. TuranSubstitutionOn: Roberto Olabe del ArcoOff: Steeve Beusnard
  6. SafaYellow cardFarid Yusifli

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Safa vs Turan?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Safa 0:1 Turan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Safa vs Turan?

Safa score 0.33 goals per game on average and Turan 1.00. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Safa's matches and 33% of Turan's.

What form are Safa and Turan in?

Over the last 5 games Safa have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Turan 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Safa vs Turan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Safa vs Turan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.