Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Saipa vs Navad Urmia: match statistics

Saipa crest
Saipa
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Navad Urmia crest
Navad Urmia
155%(1.93)
X30%(2.63)
215%(4.90)

Saipa are showing solid home form with 71% clean sheets and only a 14% loss rate at their own ground, which makes them a tough opponent for visiting sides. Navad Urmia have poor away results—50% losses, only 13% wins, and just 0.5 goals scored per away match on average. The hosts hold the edge in expected goals (xG 1.29 vs 1.0) and post better efficiency in possession (54% vs 47%). The last five-match form also favours Saipa (1.6 points per game vs 1.0). Navad Urmia fail to score in 50% of away matches, which could be decisive against the hosts’ solid defence. Taking all stats into account, Saipa have a clear advantage, although their tendency to draw at home (57%) cannot be ignored.

Saipa vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Saipa played against Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on January 3, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Saipa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Navad Urmia has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Saipa scores 0.81 goals per game and allows 0.44. Navad Urmia scores 0.75 and allows 0.69. Games in this league average 1.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 19% of Saipa's games and 44% of Navad Urmia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 13%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Saipa has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.00 per game. Saipa takes 6.7 shots per game, while Navad Urmia takes 1.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Saipa leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.44 after halftime.

When the teams score

Saipa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Navad Urmia, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Azadegan League games average 1.49 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Saipa are showing solid home form with 71% clean sheets and only a 14% loss rate at their own ground, which makes them a tough opponent for visiting sides. Navad Urmia have poor away results—50% losses, only 13% wins, and just 0.5 goals scored per away match on average. The hosts hold the edge in expected goals (xG 1.29 vs 1.0) and post better efficiency in possession (54% vs 47%). The last five-match form also favors Saipa (1.6 points per game vs 1.0). Navad Urmia fail to score in 50% of away matches, which could be decisive against the hosts’ solid defense. Taking all stats into account, Saipa have a clear advantage, although their tendency to draw at home (57%) cannot be ignored.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
SaipaNavad Urmia
11Shots10
SaipaNavad Urmia
6Shots on target4
SaipaNavad Urmia
1.5xG1.31
SaipaNavad Urmia
6Corners5
SaipaNavad Urmia
54Dangerous attacks55
SaipaNavad Urmia
-1Fouls-1
SaipaNavad Urmia
-1Cards-1
SaipaNavad Urmia

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.81Goals scored / game0.75
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.44Goals allowed / game0.69
SaipaNavad Urmia
36%Average possession14%
SaipaNavad Urmia
2.5Shots on target / game0.19
SaipaNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.69Shots per game1.88
SaipaNavad Urmia
2.5Shots on target0.19
SaipaNavad Urmia
12.1%Shot conversion40%
SaipaNavad Urmia
36%Possession14%
SaipaNavad Urmia
1.33xG for1
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.76xG against1.24
SaipaNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Saipa: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
SaipaNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)37%10%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.53
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.323.95

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Saipa is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Saipa · 1 pts / game - Navad Urmia

Saipa
DWDWL
Season result split
38% W44% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Navad Urmia
WLDLD
Season result split
19% W56% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-4
1.13 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.63Opponent xG: 0.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saipa is 8% better for: goals scored per game.

0.81 goals / game - Saipa · 0.75 goals / game - Navad Urmia

Saipa is 57% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.44 goals / game - Saipa · 0.69 goals / game - Navad Urmia

Saipa scoring profile: mixed

Saipa scores in 56% of games (9 of 16 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 75% (12 of 16 meczów).

13Goals scored (season)12
SaipaNavad Urmia
7Goals conceded (season)11
SaipaNavad Urmia
1.25Average goals per game1.44
SaipaNavad Urmia
5Goals scored (last 5)4
SaipaNavad Urmia
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
SaipaNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal63%
SaipaNavad Urmia
19%2 goals6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%3 goals6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

25%1 goal63%
SaipaNavad Urmia
19%2 goals6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%3 goals0%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SaipaNavad Urmia
13%Scored in both halves6%
SaipaNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
40%BTTS - last 560%
SaipaNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
SaipaNavad Urmia
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

2nd half

44%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
SaipaNavad Urmia
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Saipa is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Saipa · 1.13 pts / game - Navad Urmia

Saipa - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
19% leading56% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.13
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.31
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.19Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.63Average goals (1st half)0.63
SaipaNavad Urmia
81%Clean sheet before half-time69%
SaipaNavad Urmia
69%No goal before half-time75%
SaipaNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per game (2nd half)1.25
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.63Average goals (2nd half)0.81
SaipaNavad Urmia
81%Clean sheet after half-time63%
SaipaNavad Urmia
63%No goal after half-time56%
SaipaNavad Urmia

Saipa - second-half results

25% W69% R6% P
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

19% W69% R13% P
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Saipa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Navad Urmia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.20.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Saipa
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.34
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Saipa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

SaipaLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals per game 1.251.49 1.44
Both teams scored 19%32% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%21% 13%
Clean sheets 75%45% 38%
Goal before half-time 44%46% 50%
Goal after half-time 44%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.49
Average goals per game
32%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.87
Home goals / game
0.63
Away goals / game
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Saipa vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Saipa 1:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Saipa vs Navad Urmia?

Saipa score 0.81 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.75. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 19% of Saipa's matches and 44% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Saipa and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Saipa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Navad Urmia 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Saipa vs Navad Urmia?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Saipa vs Navad Urmia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.