San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match statistics
San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
San Antonio played against Tulsa Roughnecks in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
San Antonio has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Tulsa Roughnecks has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
San Antonio scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.19. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of San Antonio's games and 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 36%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
San Antonio has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.29 per game. San Antonio takes 11.7 shots per game, while Tulsa Roughnecks takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
San Antonio leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Tulsa Roughnecks leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
San Antonio's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Tulsa Roughnecks, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tulsa Roughnecks are slight favorites, as they sit 6th, have 10 wins this season, and have collected 9 points from their last five matches, compared with San Antonio’s 7 points over the same period. The key factor is the visitors’ current defensive form: they have conceded just 3 goals in their last five games, compared with 7 for the hosts, and have allowed 19 goals across the campaign, versus 26 conceded by San Antonio. Away from home, Tulsa average 1.56 goals per match and convert 13% of their shots, outperforming San Antonio’s 1.27 goals and 9% conversion rate at home. However, the hosts can rely on greater possession, averaging 54% compared with their opponents’ 42%, as well as a higher home xG of 1.57 versus the visitors’ 1.43. Home advantage limits the size of Tulsa’s edge, but their stronger recent form and significantly more reliable defense point to a Tulsa victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to San Antonio’s highly solid defense, which keeps a clean sheet in 58% of matches and concedes just 0.58 goals per game on average. The hosts also have a low season rate of matches with both teams scoring, at 25%, well below the 53% league-wide figure. Tulsa averages 1.56 goals and 4.67 shots on target per match, but BTTS has landed in only 20% of their last five fixtures, with the team conceding just 3 goals in total. San Antonio averages only 1.00 goal, fails to score in 33% of matches, and its xG of 1.23 does not provide a clear advantage over the opponent’s xG against a 1.37 goal-concession rate. The most likely scenario is therefore that at least one team will fail to score, especially with another home clean sheet or limited San Antonio attacking efficiency both possible.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to approximately 2.41 goals: the hosts average 1.23 xG, while the visitors average 1.43 xG, with San Antonio conceding just 0.58 goals per game at home. The hosts’ defense has kept a clean sheet in 58% of matches, limiting Tulsa’s attacking potential despite their average of 1.56 goals scored. San Antonio have recorded Under 3.5 goals in 92% of their matches this season, compared with 67% for Tulsa, while Over 3.5 goals has occurred in only 8% and 33% of matches, respectively. San Antonio’s last five outings have been slightly more open, with 60% of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals; however, Tulsa conceded just 0.6 goals per game during this period, and only 20% of their matches went Over 2.5 goals. Therefore, the strongest option remains Under 3.5 goals, as the data for both teams clearly points more often to a match ending with a maximum of three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as San Antonio were level at the break in 58% of their matches, compared with 33% for Tulsa. The hosts concede just 0.08 goals per match before half-time and kept a clean sheet in the first half in 92% of their appearances, which significantly limits the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. San Antonio score only 0.50 goals per match before the break, while Tulsa concede 0.56 during this period, so an early lead for the hosts is also not the most likely outcome. After half-time, Tulsa show greater attacking potential, scoring an average of 1.00 goals compared with San Antonio’s 0.50, but the hosts concede just 0.58 goals per match over the course of the season and have kept clean sheets in 58% of their games. The balance at full-time is also supported by similar xG figures: 1.23 for San Antonio and 1.43 for Tulsa, with both teams recording a drawn full-time result in approximately one quarter of their matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| San Antonio | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - San Antonio · 1.4 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Antonio scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 meczów).
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - San Antonio
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / game - San Antonio · 1.5 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
San Antonio
Tulsa Roughnecks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| San Antonio | Liga | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 52% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 26% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from San Antonio's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses against Tulsa Roughnecks. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
The USL Championship match finished San Antonio 0:0 Tulsa Roughnecks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between San Antonio and Tulsa Roughnecks?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches San Antonio won 0, Tulsa Roughnecks won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
San Antonio score 1.31 goals per game on average and Tulsa Roughnecks 1.29. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of San Antonio's matches and 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's.
What form are San Antonio and Tulsa Roughnecks in?
Over the last 5 games San Antonio have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tulsa Roughnecks 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


