United States - USL ChampionshipToyota FieldData current as of October 22, 2026

San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match statistics

San Antonio crest
San Antonio
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Tulsa Roughnecks crest
Tulsa Roughnecks

San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

San Antonio played against Tulsa Roughnecks in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Toyota Field. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

San Antonio has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Tulsa Roughnecks has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

San Antonio scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.18. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.24 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of San Antonio's games and 38% of Tulsa Roughnecks's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 29%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

San Antonio has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.32 per game. San Antonio takes 12.4 shots per game, while Tulsa Roughnecks takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

San Antonio leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Tulsa Roughnecks leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

San Antonio's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Tulsa Roughnecks, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tulsa Roughnecks are slight favorites, as they sit 6th, have 10 wins this season, and have collected 9 points from their last five matches, compared with San Antonio’s 7 points over the same period. The key factor is the visitors’ current defensive form: they have conceded just 3 goals in their last five games, compared with 7 for the hosts, and have allowed 19 goals across the campaign, versus 26 conceded by San Antonio. Away from home, Tulsa average 1.56 goals per match and convert 13% of their shots, outperforming San Antonio’s 1.27 goals and 9% conversion rate at home. However, the hosts can rely on greater possession, averaging 54% compared with their opponents’ 42%, as well as a higher home xG of 1.57 versus the visitors’ 1.43. Home advantage limits the size of Tulsa’s edge, but their stronger recent form and significantly more reliable defense point to a Tulsa victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to San Antonio’s highly solid defense, which keeps a clean sheet in 58% of matches and concedes just 0.58 goals per game on average. The hosts also have a low season rate of matches with both teams scoring, at 25%, well below the 53% league-wide figure. Tulsa averages 1.56 goals and 4.67 shots on target per match, but BTTS has landed in only 20% of their last five fixtures, with the team conceding just 3 goals in total. San Antonio averages only 1.00 goal, fails to score in 33% of matches, and its xG of 1.23 does not provide a clear advantage over the opponent’s xG against a 1.37 goal-concession rate. The most likely scenario is therefore that at least one team will fail to score, especially with another home clean sheet or limited San Antonio attacking efficiency both possible.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to approximately 2.41 goals: the hosts average 1.23 xG, while the visitors average 1.43 xG, with San Antonio conceding just 0.58 goals per game at home. The hosts’ defense has kept a clean sheet in 58% of matches, limiting Tulsa’s attacking potential despite their average of 1.56 goals scored. San Antonio have recorded Under 3.5 goals in 92% of their matches this season, compared with 67% for Tulsa, while Over 3.5 goals has occurred in only 8% and 33% of matches, respectively. San Antonio’s last five outings have been slightly more open, with 60% of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals; however, Tulsa conceded just 0.6 goals per game during this period, and only 20% of their matches went Over 2.5 goals. Therefore, the strongest option remains Under 3.5 goals, as the data for both teams clearly points more often to a match ending with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as San Antonio were level at the break in 58% of their matches, compared with 33% for Tulsa. The hosts concede just 0.08 goals per match before half-time and kept a clean sheet in the first half in 92% of their appearances, which significantly limits the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. San Antonio score only 0.50 goals per match before the break, while Tulsa concede 0.56 during this period, so an early lead for the hosts is also not the most likely outcome. After half-time, Tulsa show greater attacking potential, scoring an average of 1.00 goals compared with San Antonio’s 0.50, but the hosts concede just 0.58 goals per match over the course of the season and have kept clean sheets in 58% of their games. The balance at full-time is also supported by similar xG figures: 1.23 for San Antonio and 1.43 for Tulsa, with both teams recording a drawn full-time result in approximately one quarter of their matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
19Shots5
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
5Shots on target0
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
2.13xG0.57
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
9Corners1
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
82Dangerous attacks34
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
12Fouls11
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1Cards6
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1.27Goals scored / game1.24
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1.18Goals allowed / game0.9
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
54%Average possession44%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
3.91Shots on target / game3.52
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.36Shots per game10.9
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
3.91Shots on target3.52
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
10.3%Shot conversion11.4%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
54%Possession44%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1.38xG for1.32
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1.36xG against1.29
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

Shooting quality

San Antonio: BalancedTulsa Roughnecks: Balanced
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - San Antonio · 1.8 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks

San Antonio
WDLLW
Season result split
41% W36% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-5
1.59 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tulsa Roughnecks
WLLWW
Season result split
48% W24% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-6
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.18 goals / game - San Antonio · 0.9 goals / game - Tulsa Roughnecks

San Antonio scoring profile: mixed

San Antonio scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 games), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 games).

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: strong

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 games), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 games).

28Goals scored (season)26
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
26Goals conceded (season)19
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
2.45Average goals per game2.14
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
6Goals scored (last 5)7
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal67%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
41%2 goals29%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
18%3 goals14%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
5%4 goals10%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal57%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
32%2 goals19%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
14%3 goals5%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
5%4 goals5%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time10%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
9%BTTS in both halves5%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
32%Scored in both halves24%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
60%BTTS - last 520%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Antonio - half-time state
41% leading41% draw18% trailing
Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
38% leading48% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per game (1st half)1.62
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.52
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1.14Average goals (1st half)0.81
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
68%Clean sheet before half-time81%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
50%No goal before half-time52%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per game (2nd half)1.48
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
1.32Average goals (2nd half)1.33
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
50%Clean sheet after half-time52%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks
55%No goal after half-time57%
San AntonioTulsa Roughnecks

San Antonio - second-half results

27% W50% D23% L
36
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

38% W33% D29% L
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

San Antonio - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.40
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

San Antonio
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
5
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

San Antonio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

San AntonioLigaTulsa Roughnecks
Average goals per game▼ 2.452.72▼ 2.14
Both teams scored▼ 50%54%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 45%49%▼ 29%
Clean sheets▲ 32%27%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▲ 68%65%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 68%79%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardJeorgio Kocevski
  2. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardIan Carlo Souza Daniel
  3. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardAbdoulaye Cissoko
  4. San AntonioYellow cardChristian Sorto
  5. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Arquimides OrdonezOff: Logan Dorsey
  6. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Lilian RicolOff: Christian Sorto
  7. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Stefan LukicOff: Giordano Colli
  8. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardJamie Craig Webber
  9. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardStefan Lukic
  10. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardArquimides Ordonez
  11. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: William WilsonOff: Jamie Craig Webber
  12. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Santiago PatinoOff: Jorge Hernandez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from San Antonio's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses against Tulsa Roughnecks. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

Tulsa Roughnecks
0 : 0
San Antonio
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
2 : 0
San Antonio FC
San Antonio FC
1 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
San Antonio
1 : 3
Tulsa Roughnecks
Tulsa Roughnecks
2 : 1
San Antonio

FAQ

What was the result of San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

The USL Championship match finished San Antonio 0:0 Tulsa Roughnecks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between San Antonio and Tulsa Roughnecks?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches San Antonio won 0, Tulsa Roughnecks won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

San Antonio score 1.27 goals per game on average and Tulsa Roughnecks 1.24. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of San Antonio's matches and 38% of Tulsa Roughnecks's.

What form are San Antonio and Tulsa Roughnecks in?

Over the last 5 games San Antonio have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tulsa Roughnecks 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.