United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

San Diego vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

San Diego crest
San Diego
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Portland Timbers crest
Portland Timbers

San Diego vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Diego play Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 03:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

San Diego: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Portland Timbers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Diego scores 2.00 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.80 and concedes 1.93. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Diego 60%, Portland Timbers 67%. Over 2.5: San Diego 73%, Portland Timbers 67%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.38. San Diego: 11.7 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 12.7.

Match halves

San Diego: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.00. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

San Diego: 46-60 (7 goals). Portland Timbers: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

San Diego holds a clear home advantage in underlying metrics: at home they average 2.5 goals per game, 6.25 shots on target and 64% possession, whereas Portland averages 1.0 goals away, 4.25 shots on target and 48% possession on the road. Defensively the gap is also significant: San Diego concedes 1.0 goal at their own stadium (avg xG against 1.37), while Portland concedes 2.5 goals away (xG against 2.27) and have yet to record an away clean sheet (CS% 0). Looking at form, the hosts are in poor overall form – 0 wins in the last 5, goal differential 5:12 and an average of 0.2 points per game – but their home record is solid with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+6 at home). Portland in their last 5 have 1 win and 1 draw (goals 7:10, 0.8 pts/game), however they have lost all away matches this season (Loss% 100) and display low shot conversion (8%) and 50% of away games without scoring, which enhances the home side’s chances. Considering the hosts’ higher xG (1.51 vs 1.39), superior conversion rate (19% vs 8%), and Portland’s weak away defense (2.5 goals conceded on average), I favor San Diego to win.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
San DiegoPortland Timbers
10Shots11
San DiegoPortland Timbers
3Shots on target5
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.36xG1.24
San DiegoPortland Timbers
6Corners6
San DiegoPortland Timbers
70Dangerous attacks27
San DiegoPortland Timbers
12Fouls10
San DiegoPortland Timbers
2Cards1
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San DiegoPortland Timbers
2Goals scored / match1.8
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.8Goals conceded / match1.93
San DiegoPortland Timbers
62%Average possession50%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
4.67Shots on target / match4.8
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.73Shots per match12.67
San DiegoPortland Timbers
4.67Shots on target4.8
San DiegoPortland Timbers
17%Shot conversion14.2%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
62%Possession50%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.38xG for1.46
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.53xG against2.01
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

San Diego: Efficient finishingPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
San DiegoPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - San Diego · 1.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers

San Diego
DDWDL
Season result split
27% W33% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-6
1.13 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Portland Timbers
WDLLW
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Diego is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - San Diego · 1.8 goals / match - Portland Timbers

San Diego is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - San Diego · 1.93 goals / match - Portland Timbers

San Diego scoring profile: very strong

San Diego scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while San Diego keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

30Goals scored (season)27
San DiegoPortland Timbers
27Goals conceded (season)29
San DiegoPortland Timbers
3.8Average goals in match3.73
San DiegoPortland Timbers
13Goals scored (last 5)14
San DiegoPortland Timbers
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
San DiegoPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal73%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
60%2 goals53%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
27%3 goals20%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
13%4 goals13%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal93%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
60%2 goals67%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
33%3 goals27%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
13%4 goals7%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 15 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time40%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
20%BTTS in both halves0%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
53%Scored in both halves47%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
80%BTTS - last 560%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Diego is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - San Diego · 1.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers

San Diego - half-time state
47% leading20% draw33% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
33% leading20% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.2
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1Goals scored (1st half)1
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.07Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
San DiegoPortland Timbers
2.07Average goals (1st half)2.13
San DiegoPortland Timbers
40%Clean sheet before half-time27%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
20%No goal before half-time33%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.33
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
San DiegoPortland Timbers
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.6
San DiegoPortland Timbers
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
40%No goal after half-time47%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

San Diego - second-half results

27% W47% R27% P
24
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding57%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
18
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Diego - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.63.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.2
Average goals in match2.81.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Diego
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
5
8
31-45
7
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.76
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Diego

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

San DiegoLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match 3.803.31 3.73
Both teams scored 60%61% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%63% 67%
Clean sheets 27%22% 7%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 73%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of San Diego vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished San Diego 1:2 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before San Diego vs Portland Timbers?

San Diego score 2.00 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.80. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 60% of San Diego's matches and 67% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are San Diego and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games San Diego have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Portland Timbers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Diego vs Portland Timbers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Diego vs Portland Timbers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.