United States - MLSData current as of September 06, 2026

San Diego vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

San Diego crest
San Diego
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Portland Timbers crest
Portland Timbers

San Diego vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

San Diego played against Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

San Diego has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Portland Timbers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

San Diego scores 1.78 goals per game and allows 1.67. Portland Timbers scores 1.38 and allows 2.25. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of San Diego's games and 75% of Portland Timbers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 63%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Portland Timbers has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.27 per game. San Diego takes 10.4 shots per game, while Portland Timbers takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

San Diego leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Portland Timbers leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

San Diego's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Portland Timbers, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Diego holds a clear home advantage in underlying metrics: at home they average 2.5 goals per game, 6.25 shots on target and 64% possession, whereas Portland averages 1.0 goals away, 4.25 shots on target and 48% possession on the road. Defensively the gap is also significant: San Diego concedes 1.0 goal at their own stadium (avg xG against 1.37), while Portland concedes 2.5 goals away (xG against 2.27) and have yet to record an away clean sheet (CS% 0). Looking at form, the hosts are in poor overall form – 0 wins in the last 5, goal differential 5:12 and an average of 0.2 points per game – but their home record is solid with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+6 at home). Portland in their last 5 have 1 win and 1 draw (goals 7:10, 0.8 pts/game), however they have lost all away matches this season (Loss% 100) and display low shot conversion (8%) and 50% of away games without scoring, which enhances the home side’s chances. Considering the hosts’ higher xG (1.51 vs 1.39), superior conversion rate (19% vs 8%), and Portland’s weak away defense (2.5 goals conceded on average), I favor San Diego to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The dominant signal for BTTS - Yes is that San Diego has BTTS in 100% of matches this season, while Portland has 50% on the season; in the last 5 meetings the values are 60% (San Diego) and 80% (Portland), indicating a strong tendency toward both teams scoring. Both teams concede goals easily — San Diego concedes on average 2.0 goals for the season and 2.4 in the last 5 matches (12 conceded), and Portland 2.5 for the season and 2.0 in the last 5 (10 conceded); both sides have 0% clean sheets on the season. Offensively San Diego scores 1.75 goals on average for the season (16 goals) and has a high shot conversion rate of 19%, while Portland averages 1.0 goals for the season (11 goals) with an 8% conversion but generates higher xG (1.39 vs 1.19 San Diego), i.e. creates scoring opportunities. Additionally the league has an overall BTTS rate of 57% and San Diego has 75% of matches over 2.5 goals, which together with the high number of goals conceded makes the scenario of both teams scoring more likely. Based on these figures I assign a 70% probability to Yes and 30% to No, therefore I recommend the BTTS: Yes bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (San Diego xG_for 1.19, Portland xG_for 1.39; xG against: San Diego 2.00, Portland 2.27) projects expected goals of 1.73 for San Diego and 1.70 for Portland, totaling 3.43 goals. Both teams have 100% of matches this season over 1.5 goals (seasonOver15 100% for both), which strongly supports a scenario of at least two goals. The signal for Over 2.5 is also strong: San Diego has season over2.5 at 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, Portland 50% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, leading to an implied probability of roughly 70–75% for Over 2.5. Additionally, San Diego has a high shot conversion rate of 19% versus Portland’s 8%, and both teams concede a lot of goals (Portland avg 2.5 GA, San Diego 2.0 GA), increasing the likelihood of goal exchanges. On this basis the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is to play Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side Over).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last 5 matches Portland led at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5), while San Diego led at the break in 0% (0 of 5), which strongly favors HT=2. Additionally, the 31–45 minute goal distribution shows the visitors scored 3 goals versus 1 for the hosts, confirming their effectiveness just before half-time. San Diego, however, has a tendency for second-half turnarounds: the home side scored 2 goals in minutes 76–90 while the visitors conceded 4 in that interval; the average points gained after the break in the last 5 matches is 1.4 for San Diego versus 0.4 for Portland, increasing the likelihood of an equalizer. Furthermore, San Diego has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 1.75 vs 1.0 for Portland and higher shot conversion (19% vs 8%) with xG 1.19 vs 1.39, and season-long BTTS of 100% for the hosts vs 50% for the visitors suggests both teams to score; therefore the most probable scenario is HT/FT 2/X (visitors lead at half-time, draw after 90 minutes).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

67Possession (%)33
San DiegoPortland Timbers
10Shots11
San DiegoPortland Timbers
3Shots on target5
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.36xG1.24
San DiegoPortland Timbers
6Corners6
San DiegoPortland Timbers
70Dangerous attacks27
San DiegoPortland Timbers
12Fouls10
San DiegoPortland Timbers
2Cards1
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.78Goals scored / game1.38
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.67Goals allowed / game2.25
San DiegoPortland Timbers
64%Average possession47%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
4.56Shots on target / game4.38
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.44Shots per game10.88
San DiegoPortland Timbers
4.56Shots on target4.38
San DiegoPortland Timbers
17%Shot conversion12.6%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
64%Possession47%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.27xG for1.29
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.46xG against2.13
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

San Diego: Efficient finishingPortland Timbers: Counter-attacking
San DiegoPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)44%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Portland Timbers is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - San Diego · 0.8 pts / game - Portland Timbers

San Diego
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W22% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-4
1.22 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
WWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Portland Timbers
LDLWL
Season result split
25% W13% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-5
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 2.18BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Diego is 29% better for: goals scored per game.

1.78 goals / game - San Diego · 1.38 goals / game - Portland Timbers

San Diego is 35% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - San Diego · 2.25 goals / game - Portland Timbers

San Diego scoring profile: very strong

San Diego scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: strong

Portland Timbers scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while San Diego keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 meczów).

16Goals scored (season)11
San DiegoPortland Timbers
15Goals conceded (season)18
San DiegoPortland Timbers
3.44Average goals per game3.63
San DiegoPortland Timbers
5Goals scored (last 5)7
San DiegoPortland Timbers
12Goals conceded (last 5)10
San DiegoPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal75%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
56%2 goals50%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
22%3 goals13%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
11%4 goals0%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
56%2 goals75%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
33%3 goals38%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
11%4 goals13%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time38%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
22%BTTS in both halves0%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
56%Scored in both halves38%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
60%BTTS - last 580%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
44%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Diego - half-time state
44% leading11% draw44% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)1.38
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1Goals scored (1st half)0.88
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
San DiegoPortland Timbers
2.33Average goals (1st half)1.75
San DiegoPortland Timbers
33%Clean sheet before half-time25%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
22%No goal before half-time38%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per game (2nd half)0.63
San DiegoPortland Timbers
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
San DiegoPortland Timbers
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1.38
San DiegoPortland Timbers
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.88
San DiegoPortland Timbers
78%Clean sheet after half-time25%
San DiegoPortland Timbers
44%No goal after half-time50%
San DiegoPortland Timbers

San Diego - second-half results

33% W56% R11% P
13
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-1.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

13% W25% R63% P
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

San Diego - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.40
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game2.20.2
Average goals per game2.80.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-8+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Portland Timbers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.40
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

San Diego
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
7
31-45
5
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
1
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

San Diego

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.84
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

San DiegoLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals per game 3.443.23 3.63
Both teams scored 44%57% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 63%
Clean sheets 33%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%74% 100%
Goal after half-time 56%79% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defensive advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland TimbersGoalKevin Jesús Kelsy Genez
  2. San DiegoSubstitutionOn: Wilson EisnerOff: Ian Pilcher
  3. San DiegoYellow cardMarcus Ingvartsen
  4. Portland TimbersYellow cardKristoffer Velde
  5. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Antony Alves SantosOff: Alexander Ernesto Aravena Guzmán
  6. San DiegoYellow cardPedro Soma
  7. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Diego Ferney Chará ZamoraOff: Cole Bassett
  8. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Ariel LassiterOff: Kristoffer Velde
  9. Portland TimbersGoalAlex Bonetig

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of San Diego vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished San Diego 1:2 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before San Diego vs Portland Timbers?

San Diego score 1.78 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.38. The MLS average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 44% of San Diego's matches and 75% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are San Diego and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games San Diego have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Portland Timbers 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Diego vs Portland Timbers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Diego vs Portland Timbers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.