United States - MLS Next ProPayPal ParkData current as of 06 August 2026

San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II: match statistics

San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Jose Earthquakes II played Austin II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 3 August 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

San Jose Earthquakes II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Austin II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.06 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Austin II scores 2.16 and concedes 0.89. League average: 3.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Jose Earthquakes II 61%, Austin II 53%. Over 2.5: San Jose Earthquakes II 67%, Austin II 53%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Austin II has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.63. San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.6 shots per match, Austin II: 13.9.

Match halves

San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.89. Austin II: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.05.

Goals by minute

San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). Austin II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Austin II are favorites for this match: they sit 1st with a record of 13 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses, while San Jose have 8 wins, 3 draws and 7 losses. In the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and average 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have 9 goals (1.8 per game) and only 1.2 points per game, indicating better form for Austin. Defensively Austin is markedly more stable — an average of 0.33 goals conceded away and 67% of matches with a clean sheet, versus 0.75 goals conceded by San Jose at home and 25% clean sheets. The hosts are more efficient in finishing (conversion 19% vs 14%) and score 2.5 goals per home game compared to the visitors’ 2.11 goals on the road, but San Jose have failed to score in 38% of home matches while Austin have 0% such games. In summary, the superiority in defence, clean sheets and average points from the last 5 matches leads me to predict an Austin II win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 62% versus 38% for No. The home side posts a seasonal BTTS rate of 70% and scores 2.2 goals per game, while the league overall has 61% of matches with both teams scoring, which favors a both-teams-to-score outcome. Countervailing signals include the visitors’ 67% clean sheets and a seasonal goals-against average of 0.33, yet in the last 5 matches the away team had BTTS at 60% and conceded on average 1.2 goals, while the hosts conceded 1.6 goals, indicating increased short-term susceptibility. Additionally, xG and offensive activity support BTTS: home xG 1.58 versus away xG against 1.5, away xG 1.81 versus home xG against 1.18, and average shots 13.1 vs 14.78 with shots on target 5.0 vs 6.67. Considering the strong xG signals and recent 5-match form (home scoring 1.8, away 2.4 on average), the scenario of both teams scoring appears stronger despite the visitors’ season-long defensive numbers.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

San Jose Earthquakes II and Austin II have a very high share of matches over 1.5 goals: 90% and 89% respectively, which provides a strong signal for Over 1.5. xG-based calculations indicate 1.54 xG for San Jose (xG_for 1.58 and xG_against_away 1.50 averaging to 1.54) and 1.50 xG for Austin (xG_for 1.81 and xG_against_home 1.18 averaging to 1.50), totaling 3.04 expected goals. The hosts score on average 2.2 goals per match, the visitors 2.11, and the combined shot count is ~27.9 (13.1+14.78) with ~11.7 shots on target (5.0+6.67), which further favors goals. As a result, the strongest and most reliable signal from the provided data is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 also makes sense (~63%), while Over 3.5 appears less likely (~35%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics favor Austin II: the visitors have a 78% win rate and 0% losses this season, concede on average 0.33 goals per match with 67% clean sheets, while San Jose concedes 1.4 goals on average. In the last 5 matches Austin has led at the break in 80% of games (4/5), and San Jose only in 20% (1/5); the half-time goals average is 1.4 for the visitors versus 0.8 for the hosts. Austin has higher xG (1.81 vs 1.58) and more quick strikes (5 goals in minutes 0–15 vs 2 for the hosts), which increases the chance of a lead at the break. In the second half the visitors are very solid — on average 0.0 goals conceded and 100% clean sheets in second halves, while the hosts concede on average 1.0 goal after the break and have 80% of matches with over 1.5 goals in the second half; therefore the most likely scenario is Austin II leading at half-time and the visitors winning (HT/FT 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
17Shots5
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
7Shots on target2
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.74xG0.63
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
6Corners1
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
26Dangerous attacks23
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
10Fouls15
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1Cards1
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
2.06Goals scored / match2.16
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.28Goals conceded / match0.89
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
51%Average possession50%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
5.06Shots on target / match5.79
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.61Shots per match13.89
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
5.06Shots on target5.79
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
15.1%Shot conversion15.5%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
51%Possession50%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.63xG for1.69
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.54xG against1.33
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

Shooting quality

San Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishingAustin II: Efficient finishing
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Austin II is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 2 pts / match - Austin II

San Jose Earthquakes II
WWLLL
Season result split
44% W17% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-7
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Austin II
WWLWD
Season result split
68% W21% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-2
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Austin II is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

2.06 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 2.16 goals / match - Austin II

Austin II is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.28 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 0.89 goals / match - Austin II

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: strong

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).

Austin II scoring profile: very strong

Austin II scores in 100% of matches (19 of 19 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

37Goals scored (season)41
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
23Goals conceded (season)17
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
3.33Average goals in match3.05
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
9Goals scored (last 5)12
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal100%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
50%2 goals74%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
39%3 goals32%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
22%4 goals11%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal53%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
33%2 goals21%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
11%3 goals11%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
0%4 goals5%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 18 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time11%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
11%BTTS in both halves0%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
39%Scored in both halves26%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
40%BTTS - last 560%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
50% leading44% draw6% trailing
Austin II - half-time state
58% leading26% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.94Points per match (1st half)2
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.17Goals scored (1st half)1.11
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.47
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
67%Clean sheet before half-time74%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
33%No goal before half-time42%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)2
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)1.05
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.58
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
39%Clean sheet after half-time63%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II
56%No goal after half-time32%
San Jose Earthquakes IIAustin II

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

33% W17% R50% P
35
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 44%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Austin II - second-half results

58% W26% R16% P
38
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Austin II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.402.00
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
10
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Austin II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
10
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
10
5
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Austin II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

San Jose Earthquakes IILigaAustin II
Average goals in match 3.333.28 3.05
Both teams scored 61%62% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%66% 53%
Clean sheets 17%21% 47%
Goal before half-time 72%75% 74%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.86
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. San Jose Earthquakes IIGoalAlejandro CanoAssist: Edwyn Mendoza Magana
  2. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Dren DobrunaOff: Jules Bery
  3. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Marcel RuszelOff: Kenan Hot
  4. San Jose Earthquakes IIYellow cardAlejandro Cano
  5. San Jose Earthquakes IISubstitutionOn: Diogo BaptistaOff: Julian Donnery
  6. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Mohammad BadawiyaOff: Diego Abarca
  7. Austin IIYellow cardMarcel Ruszel
  8. San Jose Earthquakes IISubstitutionOn: Jermaine SpiveyOff: Edwyn Mendoza Magana

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: San Jose Earthquakes II 0 - 0 - 1 Austin II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

San Jose Earthquakes II
1 : 2
Austin FC II

FAQ

What was the result of San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished San Jose Earthquakes II 1:1 Austin II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II?

San Jose Earthquakes II score 2.06 goals per game on average and Austin II 2.16. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 61% of San Jose Earthquakes II's matches and 53% of Austin II's.

What form are San Jose Earthquakes II and Austin II in?

Over the last 5 games San Jose Earthquakes II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Austin II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II?

The statistical background for San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.