San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II: match statistics
San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
San Jose Earthquakes II played Austin II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 3 August 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
San Jose Earthquakes II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Austin II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.06 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Austin II scores 2.16 and concedes 0.89. League average: 3.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: San Jose Earthquakes II 61%, Austin II 53%. Over 2.5: San Jose Earthquakes II 67%, Austin II 53%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Austin II has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.63. San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.6 shots per match, Austin II: 13.9.
Match halves
San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.89. Austin II: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.05.
Goals by minute
San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). Austin II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Austin II are favorites for this match: they sit 1st with a record of 13 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses, while San Jose have 8 wins, 3 draws and 7 losses. In the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and average 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have 9 goals (1.8 per game) and only 1.2 points per game, indicating better form for Austin. Defensively Austin is markedly more stable — an average of 0.33 goals conceded away and 67% of matches with a clean sheet, versus 0.75 goals conceded by San Jose at home and 25% clean sheets. The hosts are more efficient in finishing (conversion 19% vs 14%) and score 2.5 goals per home game compared to the visitors’ 2.11 goals on the road, but San Jose have failed to score in 38% of home matches while Austin have 0% such games. In summary, the superiority in defence, clean sheets and average points from the last 5 matches leads me to predict an Austin II win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 62% versus 38% for No. The home side posts a seasonal BTTS rate of 70% and scores 2.2 goals per game, while the league overall has 61% of matches with both teams scoring, which favors a both-teams-to-score outcome. Countervailing signals include the visitors’ 67% clean sheets and a seasonal goals-against average of 0.33, yet in the last 5 matches the away team had BTTS at 60% and conceded on average 1.2 goals, while the hosts conceded 1.6 goals, indicating increased short-term susceptibility. Additionally, xG and offensive activity support BTTS: home xG 1.58 versus away xG against 1.5, away xG 1.81 versus home xG against 1.18, and average shots 13.1 vs 14.78 with shots on target 5.0 vs 6.67. Considering the strong xG signals and recent 5-match form (home scoring 1.8, away 2.4 on average), the scenario of both teams scoring appears stronger despite the visitors’ season-long defensive numbers.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
San Jose Earthquakes II and Austin II have a very high share of matches over 1.5 goals: 90% and 89% respectively, which provides a strong signal for Over 1.5. xG-based calculations indicate 1.54 xG for San Jose (xG_for 1.58 and xG_against_away 1.50 averaging to 1.54) and 1.50 xG for Austin (xG_for 1.81 and xG_against_home 1.18 averaging to 1.50), totaling 3.04 expected goals. The hosts score on average 2.2 goals per match, the visitors 2.11, and the combined shot count is ~27.9 (13.1+14.78) with ~11.7 shots on target (5.0+6.67), which further favors goals. As a result, the strongest and most reliable signal from the provided data is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 also makes sense (~63%), while Over 3.5 appears less likely (~35%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics favor Austin II: the visitors have a 78% win rate and 0% losses this season, concede on average 0.33 goals per match with 67% clean sheets, while San Jose concedes 1.4 goals on average. In the last 5 matches Austin has led at the break in 80% of games (4/5), and San Jose only in 20% (1/5); the half-time goals average is 1.4 for the visitors versus 0.8 for the hosts. Austin has higher xG (1.81 vs 1.58) and more quick strikes (5 goals in minutes 0–15 vs 2 for the hosts), which increases the chance of a lead at the break. In the second half the visitors are very solid — on average 0.0 goals conceded and 100% clean sheets in second halves, while the hosts concede on average 1.0 goal after the break and have 80% of matches with over 1.5 goals in the second half; therefore the most likely scenario is Austin II leading at half-time and the visitors winning (HT/FT 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| San Jose Earthquakes II | Austin II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Austin II is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 2 pts / match - Austin II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Austin II is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
2.06 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 2.16 goals / match - Austin II
Austin II is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 0.89 goals / match - Austin II
San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).
Austin II scores in 100% of matches (19 of 19 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — San Jose Earthquakes II
Over / Under — Austin II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 44%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Austin II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
San Jose Earthquakes II
Austin II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| San Jose Earthquakes II | Liga | Austin II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.33 | 3.28 | ▼ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | • 61% | 62% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 67% | 66% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: San Jose Earthquakes II 0 - 0 - 1 Austin II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished San Jose Earthquakes II 1:1 Austin II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II?
San Jose Earthquakes II score 2.06 goals per game on average and Austin II 2.16. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 61% of San Jose Earthquakes II's matches and 53% of Austin II's.
What form are San Jose Earthquakes II and Austin II in?
Over the last 5 games San Jose Earthquakes II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Austin II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II?
The statistical background for San Jose Earthquakes II vs Austin II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


