United States - MLS Next ProData current as of September 07, 2026

San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance: match statistics

San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

San Jose Earthquakes II played against Tacoma Defiance in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on July 12, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

San Jose Earthquakes II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Tacoma Defiance has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.47 goals per game and allows 1.20. Tacoma Defiance scores 1.06 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 73% of San Jose Earthquakes II's games and 41% of Tacoma Defiance's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 53%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

San Jose Earthquakes II has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.37 per game. San Jose Earthquakes II takes 13.1 shots per game, while Tacoma Defiance takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

San Jose Earthquakes II leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 1.07 goals per game after halftime. Tacoma Defiance leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

San Jose Earthquakes II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Tacoma Defiance, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Jose Earthquakes II are the clear favorites: at home they score an average of 3.33 goals per game with 5.67 shots on target and a conversion rate of 27%. Their home defense concedes just 0.67 goals per game on average and they keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, while Tacoma Defiance concede 2.0 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in only 14% of games. The difference in quality of chances is also visible in xG: San Jose averages 1.5 xG at home versus 1.33 xG for the visitors, yet the hosts actually convert those chances into 3.33 goals, while Tacoma manage only 1.0 goals on the road. Form reinforces the advantage – San Jose earns 2.0 points per game over the last 5 matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), Tacoma just 1.4 points (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses); additionally the visitors failed to score in 43% of away fixtures versus 17% for the hosts. Considering the higher conversion rate (27% vs 9%), superior home goal difference (+16 vs -7 away) and markedly better defensive efficiency, I predict a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I forecast BTTS - Yes at 60% vs No at 40%. San Jose has BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and scores an average of 3.2 goals per game (16 goals in 5), while Tacoma has BTTS in 40% of their last 5 and averages 1.0 goals (5 in 5). Tacoma concedes 2.0 goals per game this season and keeps only 14% clean sheets, whereas San Jose concedes 1.0 with 30% clean sheets — this suggests both sides have high chances to score. Additionally, xG shows 1.39 for San Jose and 1.58 xG against Tacoma, and San Jose averages 4.5 shots on target versus Tacoma’s 3.14, which supports a Goal/Goal scenario. Even though the teams’ season BTTS rates are relatively low (40% and 43%), San Jose’s form edge and a league BTTS of 62% lead me to pick BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG- and match-average-based model yields expected goals of 1.49 for San Jose (attacking xG 1.39 and xG conceded vs Tacoma 1.58) and 1.39 for Tacoma (attacking xG 1.33 and xG conceded vs San Jose 1.46), totaling 2.88 goals. San Jose have scored 16 goals in their last 5 matches (3.2 per game) and have had 100% of games over 2.5 goals, while Tacoma have 71% of season games over 2.5 and concede on average 2.0 goals per match. With a Poisson distribution lambda=2.88 the probability of Over 1.5 is ~78%, Over 2.5 ~55%, and Over 3.5 ~33%. Additionally both teams have a high share of matches with at least one goal (Over 0.5: 90% San Jose vs 100% Tacoma) and Tacoma keep clean sheets only 14% of the time, supporting a higher-goal outcome. As a result the strongest and safest signal from the data is to play Over 1.5 (78% vs 22% for Under), based on the combined xG 2.88, San Jose form (3.2 average in last 5) and Tacoma’s weak defense (2.0 goals conceded).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last five matches San Jose led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 1.8 first-half goals, whereas Tacoma managed only 0.2 first-half goals across those five matches. The home side have averaged 3.2 goals per game in their last five fixtures compared to 1.0 for the visitors, with 4.5 shots on target versus 3.14 for opponents and an xG of 1.39 against 1.33, indicating higher quality chances. Tacoma concede an average of 2.0 goals per game this season and have only a 14% win rate, so the likelihood of a turnaround is limited. Additionally, when San Jose led at half-time they held the lead through full-time in 80% of cases, although season-long the hosts have led at the break in 20% of matches (20% seasonally vs 60% in the last five), therefore the lead-at-the-break and full-time win scenario for the home side is the strongest (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
13Shots13
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
5Shots on target3
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.68xG1.38
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
4Corners4
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
69Dangerous attacks48
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
13Fouls13
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1Cards2
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
2.47Goals scored / game1.06
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.2Goals allowed / game1.41
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
49%Average possession46%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
5Shots on target / game3.94
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.13Shots per game11.59
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
5Shots on target3.94
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
18.8%Shot conversion9.1%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
49%Possession46%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.58xG for1.37
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.61xG against1.51
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Shooting quality

San Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishingTacoma Defiance: Balanced
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.490.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - San Jose Earthquakes II · 1.4 pts / game - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II
DWLWW
Season result split
53% W20% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / game · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Tacoma Defiance
LWWDL
Season result split
29% W24% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-8
1.12 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 133% better for: goals scored per game.

2.47 goals / game - San Jose Earthquakes II · 1.06 goals / game - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - San Jose Earthquakes II · 1.41 goals / game - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: very strong

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: strong

Tacoma Defiance scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).

37Goals scored (season)18
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
18Goals conceded (season)24
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
3.67Average goals per game2.47
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
16Goals scored (last 5)5
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal59%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
60%2 goals35%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
47%3 goals6%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
27%4 goals6%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal76%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
33%2 goals47%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
7%3 goals12%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0%4 goals6%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

73%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 15 meczów
61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time18%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
13%BTTS in both halves12%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
47%Scored in both halves18%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
80%BTTS - last 540%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.13 pts / game - San Jose Earthquakes II · 0.94 pts / game - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
60% leading33% draw7% trailing
Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
12% leading59% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.13Points per game (1st half)0.94
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.4Goals scored (1st half)0.35
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.8Average goals (1st half)0.88
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
60%Clean sheet before half-time53%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
20%No goal before half-time76%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)1.24
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.59
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
47%Clean sheet after half-time41%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
47%No goal after half-time47%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
32
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 53%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding242%

Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game1.81.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game2.42.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 9
Tacoma Defiance - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
10
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
6
3
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
7
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.89
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

San Jose Earthquakes IILigaTacoma Defiance
Average goals per game 3.673.24 2.47
Both teams scored 73%61% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%66% 53%
Clean sheets 20%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 87%75% 53%
Goal after half-time 80%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardDaniel Robles
  2. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardCodey Phoenix
  3. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Leonardo Flores GonzalezOff: Codey Phoenix
  4. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Mitchell EmertOff: Rafael Jauregui
  5. San Jose Earthquakes IISubstitutionOn: Jermaine SpiveyOff: Kaedren Spivey
  6. San Jose Earthquakes IIYellow cardAlejandro Cano
  7. Tacoma DefianceGoalXavi GnaulatiAssist: Mark Bronnik
  8. San Jose Earthquakes IISubstitutionOn: Martin Kwende Jr.Off: Diogo Baptista
  9. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Brayden SmithOff: Daniel Robles

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from San Jose Earthquakes II's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses against Tacoma Defiance. Games average 3.25 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Tacoma Defiance
0 : 0
San Jose Earthquakes II
San Jose Earthquakes II
0 : 1
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
4 : 4
San Jose Earthquakes II
Tacoma Defiance
3 : 1
San Jose Earthquakes II

FAQ

What was the result of San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The MLS Next Pro match finished San Jose Earthquakes II 0:1 Tacoma Defiance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between San Jose Earthquakes II and Tacoma Defiance?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches San Jose Earthquakes II won 0, Tacoma Defiance won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance?

San Jose Earthquakes II score 2.47 goals per game on average and Tacoma Defiance 1.06. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 73% of San Jose Earthquakes II's matches and 41% of Tacoma Defiance's.

What form are San Jose Earthquakes II and Tacoma Defiance in?

Over the last 5 games San Jose Earthquakes II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tacoma Defiance 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.