Sanat Naft vs Be'sat Kermanshah: match statistics
Sanat Naft displays significantly better form and statistics, occupying 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins this season. The hosts are extremely effective at home, winning 64% of their home matches with just 0% losses and conceding an average of only 0.55 goals per game. Be'sat Kermanshah sits in 10th position with very poor away form - only 18% of away matches won and as many as 64% of matches in which they failed to score. The difference in quality is also evident in possession (54% vs 49%) and the average goals scored (1.55 vs 0.55 in home/away matches). The last five matches confirm the hosts' superiority - Sanat Naft has collected 10 points (2 PPG), while Be'sat has managed only 4 points (0.8 PPG). All indicators unequivocally point to a certain victory for the hosts.
Sanat Naft vs Be'sat Kermanshah: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sanat Naft played against Be'sat Kermanshah in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on February 15, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Sanat Naft has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Be'sat Kermanshah has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sanat Naft scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.57. Be'sat Kermanshah scores 0.76 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 1.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Sanat Naft's games and 29% of Be'sat Kermanshah's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 29%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.20 to 0.94 per game. Sanat Naft takes 5.3 shots per game, while Be'sat Kermanshah takes 0.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Be'sat Kermanshah leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sanat Naft's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Be'sat Kermanshah, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.53 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sanat Naft displays significantly better form and statistics, occupying 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins this season. The hosts are extremely effective at home, winning 64% of their home matches with just 0% losses and conceding an average of only 0.55 goals per game. Be'sat Kermanshah sits in 10th position with very poor away form - only 18% of away matches won and as many as 64% of matches in which they failed to score. The difference in quality is also evident in possession (54% vs 49%) and the average goals scored (1.55 vs 0.55 in home/away matches). The last five matches confirm the hosts' superiority - Sanat Naft has collected 10 points (2 PPG), while Be'sat has managed only 4 points (0.8 PPG). All indicators unequivocally point to a certain victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sanat Naft | Be'sat Kermanshah | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | -36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.23 | 1.40 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.67 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 0.8 pts / game - Be'sat Kermanshah
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 0.76 goals / game - Be'sat Kermanshah
Sanat Naft is 51% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.57 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 0.86 goals / game - Be'sat Kermanshah
Sanat Naft scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Be'sat Kermanshah keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 meczów).
Be'sat Kermanshah scores in 48% of games (10 of 21 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
Over / Under - Be'sat Kermanshah
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sanat Naft is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 1 pts / game - Be'sat Kermanshah
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Be'sat Kermanshah - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sanat Naft
Be'sat Kermanshah
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Sanat Naft | Liga | Be'sat Kermanshah | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.71 | 1.53 | • 1.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 29% | 22% | ▲ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 38% | 46% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 58% | • 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Be'sat KermanshahGoalMohammad Mehdi Mehdikhani
Head-to-head
Record from Sanat Naft's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Be'sat Kermanshah. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Be'sat Kermanshah?
The Azadegan League match finished Sanat Naft 2:1 Be'sat Kermanshah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Be'sat Kermanshah?
Sanat Naft score 1.14 goals per game on average and Be'sat Kermanshah 0.76. The Azadegan League average is 1.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Sanat Naft's matches and 29% of Be'sat Kermanshah's.
What form are Sanat Naft and Be'sat Kermanshah in?
Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Be'sat Kermanshah 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Be'sat Kermanshah?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanat Naft vs Be'sat Kermanshah: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.