Sanat Naft vs Foolad: match statistics
Sanat Naft vs Foolad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sanat Naft played against Foolad in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on August 24, 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Sanat Naft has 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Foolad has 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Sanat Naft scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 0.50. Foolad scores 0.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 1.96 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Sanat Naft's games and 50% of Foolad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 0%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 23% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 0.00 per game. Sanat Naft takes -1.0 shots per game, while Foolad takes -1.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Foolad leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sanat Naft's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Foolad, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.96 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 23% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams have started the season in identical fashion: two draws and a 1:1 record, making it difficult to identify a clear favorite. Sanat Naft and Foolad are also in identical overall form, with each winning 3, drawing 2 and scoring 8 goals in their last five matches. During this period, the hosts conceded just 2 goals, one fewer than Foolad, giving them a slight edge in defensive stability. On the other hand, Foolad’s only away match so far ended in a 0:0 draw with a clean sheet, while Sanat Naft also drew 1:1 at home. The data points to a very evenly matched and rather cautious encounter, with a draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No pick is primarily supported by the league’s very low-scoring profile: only 33% of matches have seen both teams score, while the average number of goals is just 1.78. Sanat Naft have conceded an average of only 0.4 goals in their last 5 matches, compared with 0.6 for Foolad, meaning both defenses regularly restrict opponents to very few chances. In the season data, Foolad have not scored a goal yet, have kept clean sheets in 100% of their matches, and have failed to score in 100% of games, strengthening the likelihood that at least one team will remain goalless. The recent attacking form of both sides is better, with each averaging 1.6 goals per match across their last five appearances, but BTTS figures from that period—40% for Sanat Naft and 60% for Foolad—are not sufficient to outweigh the defensive nature of the competition.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The league profile clearly favors low-scoring results: an average of 1.78 goals is scored, and only 17% of matches go over 2.5 goals. In the available data for both teams, all matches finished under 2.5 and 3.5 goals, with each side averaging 1 goal scored and 1 conceded. Their last five appearances have been slightly more attacking, as Sanat Naft and Foolad have scored 8 goals each, while their defenses have conceded only 2 and 3 goals, respectively. Sanat Naft have had at least three goals in 20% of matches in this sample, compared with 40% for Foolad, which nevertheless does not challenge the league’s very low frequency of high-scoring games. The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of 1.65 goals leaves a substantial margin even for a 2:1 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, and neither side was trailing at half-time during this period. Sanat Naft averaged 1.0 goals scored before the break, while Foolad averaged 0.8, with both conceding an identical average of 0.4 goals, indicating very little difference in quality during the opening phase. Across their last five matches, both teams have averaged 2.2 points per game, with a record of three wins and two draws and no defeats, making it difficult to clearly favor either side for the final victory. After the break, Sanat Naft conceded no goals on average, while Foolad conceded just 0.2, limiting the likelihood of a decisive outcome. In addition, the league is low-scoring, averaging 1.78 goals per match, with 89% of games featuring at least one clean sheet, which supports the cautious X/X HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sanat Naft | Foolad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 0% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Foolad keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
Foolad scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
Over / Under - Foolad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Foolad - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sanat Naft
Foolad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Sanat Naft | Liga | Foolad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.00 | 1.96 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 69% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Foolad?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Sanat Naft 0:3 Foolad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Foolad?
Sanat Naft score 0.50 goals per game on average and Foolad 0.50. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sanat Naft's matches and 50% of Foolad's.
What form are Sanat Naft and Foolad in?
Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 0-2-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Foolad 0-2-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Foolad?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanat Naft vs Foolad: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.