Sanat Naft vs Navad Urmia: match statistics
Sanat Naft vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sanat Naft played against Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on December 12, 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Sanat Naft has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Navad Urmia has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Sanat Naft scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 0.57. Navad Urmia scores 0.79 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 1.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Sanat Naft's games and 43% of Navad Urmia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 14%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.13 to 1.09 per game. Sanat Naft takes 6.0 shots per game, while Navad Urmia takes 1.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sanat Naft's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Navad Urmia, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.50 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sanat Naft | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 16% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.61 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.52 | 2.72 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 150% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 1.2 pts / game - Navad Urmia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
0.93 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 0.79 goals / game - Navad Urmia
Sanat Naft is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.57 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 0.64 goals / game - Navad Urmia
Sanat Naft scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 meczów).
Navad Urmia scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navad Urmia is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 1.21 pts / game - Navad Urmia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sanat Naft
Navad Urmia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Sanat Naft | Liga | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.50 | 1.50 | • 1.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 30% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 29% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 29% | 43% | • 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 64% | 58% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Navad Urmia?
The Azadegan League match finished Sanat Naft 1:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Navad Urmia?
Sanat Naft score 0.93 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.79. The Azadegan League average is 1.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Sanat Naft's matches and 43% of Navad Urmia's.
What form are Sanat Naft and Navad Urmia in?
Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Navad Urmia 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Navad Urmia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanat Naft vs Navad Urmia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.