Sandnes Ulf vs Egersund: match statistics
Sandnes Ulf vs Egersund: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sandnes Ulf played against Egersund in First Division (Norway). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
Sandnes Ulf has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Egersund has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sandnes Ulf scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 1.50. Egersund scores 1.67 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 3.34 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's games and 33% of Egersund's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Egersund has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.26 per game. Sandnes Ulf takes 10.8 shots per game, while Egersund takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sandnes Ulf leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Egersund leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sandnes Ulf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Egersund, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.34 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an Egersund win: the visitors sit 5th in the table versus Sandnes in 12th and have 4 wins this season compared to the hosts' 1 win, with 10 goals scored versus 5. In their last 5 matches Egersund won 3 times and averages 1.8 points per match, while Sandnes are 1-1-3 and average 0.8 points per match. Sandnes at home record 0% wins, average 0.67 goals scored and 1.67 conceded per game with xG 1.14 and xG against 1.32, whereas Egersund away average 2.0 goals scored, 1.0 conceded and have xG 1.48 with xG against 1.14. The visitors create and convert more chances: on average 5 shots on target per match and a 17% conversion rate versus 2.67 shots on target and 6% conversion for Sandnes; Sandnes fail to score in 33% of home games while Egersund have 0% such away games. Considering Sandnes' 0% home wins, Egersund's 50% clean sheets away and the advantage in xG, possession and shots on target, I estimate a 70% probability of a visitor win, 20% draw and 10% home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Egersund possesses a potent attack: 2.0 goals per game on the season, 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per game) and 1.45 xG in those five games, and they have not registered a match without scoring this season (0% matches without a goal). Sandnes Ulf averages 1.5 goals per game statistically and has a low seasonal BTTS rate of 25% with 50% of matches as clean sheets, which favors the No Goal scenario. However, Sandnes’ defense has looked weaker recently — conceding 1.4 goals on average in the last 5 matches with 1.47 xG against, while Egersund has 1.45 attacking xG in those five and shows higher shot efficiency (5.0 on-target per game and 17% conversion versus Sandnes’ 3.5 and 11%). Additionally, both teams have similar seasonal attacking xG at 1.48, and the league has a seasonal BTTS rate of 53% and an average of 3.34 goals per game, providing a general context supportive of both teams scoring. Considering this, the stronger signal points to BTTS - Yes; I assign 62% probability to Yes and 38% to No, since Egersund’s attacking strength and Sandnes’ defensive decline outweigh the hosts’ seasonal tendency to keep clean sheets.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have identical offensive xG of 1.48 and their opponents concede xG of 1.28 (Sandnes) and 1.14 (Egersund), yielding expected goals of ~1.31 for the home side and ~1.38 for the visitors (total 2.69). A Poisson model with λ=2.69 gives P(Over 1.5) ≈75%, P(Over 2.5) ≈50% and P(Over 3.5) ≈28%, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, Egersund averages 2.0 goals per game this season and has 100% of matches Over 2.5, while Sandnes has 50% of matches Over 2.5 and 50% clean sheets, which together increase the probability of at least 2 goals in the match. The absence of matches with over 3.5 goals for both teams this season (0%) limits the chance of a very high-scoring game, therefore I prefer the Over line at 1.5 as the safest choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sandnes Ulf has a strong HT advantage: they led at the break in 3 of 4 home matches (75%) and score on average 1.25 goals by Half-Time while conceding 0.0, whereas Egersund register 1.0 goal by Half-Time and concede 0.5 on average. Seasonally the home side averages 2.25 points per home match versus 1.5 points for the visitors, and the Half-Time points tally is 10 for Sandnes versus 3 for Egersund, which supports maintaining a lead at the break. At the same time the visitors have better shooting efficiency (17% vs 11%), more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.5) and a stronger second half (on average 1.5 goals after Half-Time versus 0.75 for the hosts), so there is a real chance for a turnaround. The xG of both teams is almost identical (1.48 vs 1.48), suggesting Sandnes’s HT advantage is determined by consistency and defense rather than a higher number of created chances. Therefore I favor 1/1 as the safest scenario (44%), while still assigning a significant share to 1/X (19%) and X/1 (13%) given the visitors’ offensive strength after Half-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sandnes Ulf | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Egersund is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.8 pts / game - Egersund
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Egersund is 101% better for: goals scored per game.
0.83 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.67 goals / game - Egersund
Egersund is 124% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 0.67 goals / game - Egersund
Sandnes Ulf scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).
Egersund scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sandnes Ulf
Over / Under - Egersund
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 334% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf · 2.17 pts / game - Egersund
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sandnes Ulf - second-half results
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sandnes Ulf
Egersund
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sandnes Ulf | Liga | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.33 | 3.34 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Sandnes Ulf vs Egersund?
The First Division match finished Sandnes Ulf 4:2 Egersund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sandnes Ulf vs Egersund?
Sandnes Ulf score 0.83 goals per game on average and Egersund 1.67. The First Division average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's matches and 33% of Egersund's.
What form are Sandnes Ulf and Egersund in?
Over the last 5 games Sandnes Ulf have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Egersund 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sandnes Ulf vs Egersund?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sandnes Ulf vs Egersund: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.