Norway - First DivisionSandnes IdrettsparkData current as of September 06, 2026

Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: match statistics

Sandnes Ulf crest
Sandnes Ulf
1 : 6half-time 0:3
Kongsvinger crest
Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Sandnes Ulf played against Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Sandnes Idrettspark. Final score: 1:6.

Recent form

Sandnes Ulf has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Sandnes Ulf scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.43. Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's games and 79% of Kongsvinger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 86%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.41 per game. Sandnes Ulf takes 12.1 shots per game, while Kongsvinger takes 14.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Sandnes Ulf leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 1.21 goals per game after halftime. Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Sandnes Ulf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Kongsvinger, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division games average 3.73 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sandnes Ulf has a solid defensive record at home: they concede on average 1.00 goal per match and keep a clean sheet in 43% of games, while Kongsvinger concede an average of 1.57 goals away and have only 14% clean sheets. Offensively both teams show similar season efficiency — the hosts score 1.86 goals on average at home, and the visitors score 1.86 goals on average away — but in the last 5 matches Kongsvinger has scored 16 goals (3.2 avg.) versus Sandnes’s 11 goals (2.2 avg.). Average xG are virtually identical (1.57 for Sandnes and 1.58 for Kongsvinger), however Kongsvinger allows a higher xG against (1.76 vs 1.17), which suggests that despite higher possession (53% vs 41%) the visitors are more exposed to dangerous situations. Additionally the hosts have a better home record — 57% wins and +6 goal difference at home — while the visitors sit 2nd in the table and have 9 wins this season, but only +2 goal difference away. Considering Sandnes’s strong home defense and the offensive balance between the teams I forecast a home win (pick '1'); I assess the probabilities as: home win 50%, draw 24%, away win 26%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics indicate a high incidence of BTTS: Sandnes Ulf have 86% of matches with both teams scoring this season, Kongsvinger 71%, and the league average is 60%, suggesting an above-average likelihood of BTTS in this matchup. In the last 5 games Kongsvinger have 100% BTTS and concede an average of 2.2 goals, while Sandnes have 60% BTTS and concede 1.4 on average, meaning both teams regularly allow goals. Offensively Sandnes generate xG 1.96 on average and have a seasonal goals-scored average of 3.29 per match, whereas Kongsvinger have xG 1.58 and have scored 3.2 goals on average in their last 5 matches (16 goals), which increases the chance of goal returns for both sides. Both teams have low clean sheet rates at 14% and concede seasonally 1.43 and 1.57 goals respectively, which further supports the BTTS scenario. Therefore the most likely market outcome is BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of around 82%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sandnes generates on average xG 1.96 and 16.14 shots per match (6.86 on target) with a conversion rate of 20.0%, while Kongsvinger has xG 1.58 from 13.29 shots (5.57 on target) and a 14.0% conversion. A model based on average xG (home xG 1.96 and away xG conceded 1.76) yields 1.86 expected goals for Sandnes and 1.46 for Kongsvinger, totaling 3.32 goals. Seasonal stats are clear: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Sandnes has 100% of matches over 2.5 and Kongsvinger 71%, and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 86% and 71% respectively. In the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded/produced 16 goals (3.2 avg), and the home side 11 goals (2.2 avg), which further reinforces an expectation of a high-scoring game. Based on this I recommend the Over side, best line is Over 1.5 (prediction 97%), with strong support for Over 2.5 (~82%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~58%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sandnes Ulf are home favorites: they have won 86% of matches at their stadium and average 3.29 goals per game versus Kongsvinger’s 1.86; the hosts’ xG is 1.96 compared to the visitors’ 1.58, confirming a quality advantage. However, in the first half of the last five fixtures Kongsvinger scored 15 goals by the break (avg. 3.0), while Sandnes managed 4 first-half goals in those five matches (avg. 0.8), so there is a real risk of a draw or the visitors leading at the break. After the interval the hosts statistically dominate: Sandnes scored 8 goals in minutes 46–60 versus Kongsvinger’s 3 and average 2.29 goals after half-time compared to 0.71 for their opponents, and the hosts win 86% of second halves, which suggests a turnaround. Additionally, Sandnes’ shot conversion is 20% versus Kongsvinger’s 14%, so the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Sandnes Full-Time win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 3
First half
1 : 3
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
10Shots4
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
4Shots on target2
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.27xG0.81
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
6Corners3
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
49Dangerous attacks56
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
13Fouls10
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1Cards1
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.57Goals scored / game2.57
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.43Goals allowed / game1.5
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
41%Average possession54%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
4.36Shots on target / game6.21
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.14Shots per game14.71
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
4.36Shots on target6.21
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
12.9%Shot conversion17.5%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
41%Possession54%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.41xG for1.77
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.39xG against1.55
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Shooting quality

Sandnes Ulf: Counter-attackingKongsvinger: Attacking
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sandnes Ulf
LWWWD
Season result split
43% W14% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-6
1.43 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kongsvinger
WWDLW
Season result split
64% W21% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-2
2.14 pts / game · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kongsvinger is 64% better for: goals scored per game.

1.57 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 2.57 goals / game - Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.43 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.5 goals / game - Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf scoring profile: very strong

Sandnes Ulf scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).

Kongsvinger scoring profile: very strong

Kongsvinger scores in 93% of games (13 of 14 meczów), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)36
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
20Goals conceded (season)21
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
3Average goals per game4.07
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
11Goals scored (last 5)16
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal93%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
43%2 goals86%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
21%3 goals50%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
14%4 goals21%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
43%2 goals36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
14%3 goals14%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7%4 goals14%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
21%Scored in both halves50%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kongsvinger is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.43 pts / game - Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf - half-time state
21% leading43% draw36% trailing
Kongsvinger - half-time state
43% leading14% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per game (1st half)1.43
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.36Goals scored (1st half)1.07
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.93
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
57%Clean sheet before half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
71%No goal before half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per game (2nd half)2.07
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
2.07Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
36%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
29%No goal after half-time21%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding205%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kongsvinger - second-half results

64% W14% R21% P
20
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sandnes Ulf - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.00
Goals scored / game0.22.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.82.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kongsvinger - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.602.40
Goals scored / game1.41.8
Goals allowed / game1.60.6
Average goals per game3.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Sandnes Ulf
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
6
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Kongsvinger
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
7
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
11
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Sandnes Ulf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Kongsvinger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

Sandnes UlfLigaKongsvinger
Average goals per game 3.003.73 4.07
Both teams scored 50%61% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%73% 86%
Clean sheets 29%21% 14%
Goal before half-time 64%76% 93%
Goal after half-time 93%89% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.73
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.15
Home goals / game
1.58
Away goals / game
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
37%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KongsvingerGoalAndreas Dybevik
  2. Sandnes UlfGoalTord Rokkones Flolid
  3. KongsvingerYellow cardMapenda Mbow
  4. KongsvingerSubstitutionOn: Daniel LysgårdOff: Saadiq Faisal Elmi
  5. Sandnes UlfYellow cardGullbrandur í Horni Øregaard
  6. Sandnes UlfSubstitutionOn: Ådne Gikling BrusethOff: Yann-Erik de Lanlay
  7. KongsvingerGoalDaniel JobAssist: Andreas Dybevik
  8. KongsvingerGoalAngelos Chaminta
  9. Sandnes UlfGoalAli MemedAssist: Fillip Voster Botnen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?

The First Division match finished Sandnes Ulf 1:6 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?

Sandnes Ulf score 1.57 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.57. The First Division average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's matches and 79% of Kongsvinger's.

What form are Sandnes Ulf and Kongsvinger in?

Over the last 5 games Sandnes Ulf have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?

The statistical background for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.