Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sandnes Ulf played against Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Sandnes Idrettspark. Final score: 1:6.
Recent form
Sandnes Ulf has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Sandnes Ulf scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.43. Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's games and 79% of Kongsvinger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 86%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.41 per game. Sandnes Ulf takes 12.1 shots per game, while Kongsvinger takes 14.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Sandnes Ulf leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 1.21 goals per game after halftime. Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sandnes Ulf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Kongsvinger, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.73 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sandnes Ulf has a solid defensive record at home: they concede on average 1.00 goal per match and keep a clean sheet in 43% of games, while Kongsvinger concede an average of 1.57 goals away and have only 14% clean sheets. Offensively both teams show similar season efficiency — the hosts score 1.86 goals on average at home, and the visitors score 1.86 goals on average away — but in the last 5 matches Kongsvinger has scored 16 goals (3.2 avg.) versus Sandnes’s 11 goals (2.2 avg.). Average xG are virtually identical (1.57 for Sandnes and 1.58 for Kongsvinger), however Kongsvinger allows a higher xG against (1.76 vs 1.17), which suggests that despite higher possession (53% vs 41%) the visitors are more exposed to dangerous situations. Additionally the hosts have a better home record — 57% wins and +6 goal difference at home — while the visitors sit 2nd in the table and have 9 wins this season, but only +2 goal difference away. Considering Sandnes’s strong home defense and the offensive balance between the teams I forecast a home win (pick '1'); I assess the probabilities as: home win 50%, draw 24%, away win 26%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics indicate a high incidence of BTTS: Sandnes Ulf have 86% of matches with both teams scoring this season, Kongsvinger 71%, and the league average is 60%, suggesting an above-average likelihood of BTTS in this matchup. In the last 5 games Kongsvinger have 100% BTTS and concede an average of 2.2 goals, while Sandnes have 60% BTTS and concede 1.4 on average, meaning both teams regularly allow goals. Offensively Sandnes generate xG 1.96 on average and have a seasonal goals-scored average of 3.29 per match, whereas Kongsvinger have xG 1.58 and have scored 3.2 goals on average in their last 5 matches (16 goals), which increases the chance of goal returns for both sides. Both teams have low clean sheet rates at 14% and concede seasonally 1.43 and 1.57 goals respectively, which further supports the BTTS scenario. Therefore the most likely market outcome is BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of around 82%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sandnes generates on average xG 1.96 and 16.14 shots per match (6.86 on target) with a conversion rate of 20.0%, while Kongsvinger has xG 1.58 from 13.29 shots (5.57 on target) and a 14.0% conversion. A model based on average xG (home xG 1.96 and away xG conceded 1.76) yields 1.86 expected goals for Sandnes and 1.46 for Kongsvinger, totaling 3.32 goals. Seasonal stats are clear: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Sandnes has 100% of matches over 2.5 and Kongsvinger 71%, and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 86% and 71% respectively. In the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded/produced 16 goals (3.2 avg), and the home side 11 goals (2.2 avg), which further reinforces an expectation of a high-scoring game. Based on this I recommend the Over side, best line is Over 1.5 (prediction 97%), with strong support for Over 2.5 (~82%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~58%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sandnes Ulf are home favorites: they have won 86% of matches at their stadium and average 3.29 goals per game versus Kongsvinger’s 1.86; the hosts’ xG is 1.96 compared to the visitors’ 1.58, confirming a quality advantage. However, in the first half of the last five fixtures Kongsvinger scored 15 goals by the break (avg. 3.0), while Sandnes managed 4 first-half goals in those five matches (avg. 0.8), so there is a real risk of a draw or the visitors leading at the break. After the interval the hosts statistically dominate: Sandnes scored 8 goals in minutes 46–60 versus Kongsvinger’s 3 and average 2.29 goals after half-time compared to 0.71 for their opponents, and the hosts win 86% of second halves, which suggests a turnaround. Additionally, Sandnes’ shot conversion is 20% versus Kongsvinger’s 14%, so the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Sandnes Full-Time win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sandnes Ulf | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 64% better for: goals scored per game.
1.57 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 2.57 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Sandnes Ulf is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.5 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Sandnes Ulf scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
Kongsvinger scores in 93% of games (13 of 14 meczów), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sandnes Ulf
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.43 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sandnes Ulf - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sandnes Ulf
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sandnes Ulf | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.73 | ▲ 4.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 76% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 89% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Sandnes Ulf 1:6 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?
Sandnes Ulf score 1.57 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.57. The First Division average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's matches and 79% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Sandnes Ulf and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Sandnes Ulf have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


