South Korea - K League 1Data current as of September 07, 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Anyang crest
Anyang

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Sangju Sangmu played against Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Sangju Sangmu has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Anyang has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 1.00. Anyang scores 1.00 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 83% of Sangju Sangmu's games and 83% of Anyang's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 33%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sangju Sangmu has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.15 per game. Sangju Sangmu takes 10.8 shots per game, while Anyang takes 8.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Anyang leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Sangju Sangmu's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For Anyang, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 1 games average 2.08 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw. Sangju Sangmu at home has 0% wins and 100% draws (0 wins, 5 draws), scores on average 1.0 goals per home match with 12.33 average shots and 4 on target and xG 1.5, while conceding 1.0 goals on average (xG against 1.26). Anyang away also has no wins (0% wins) and records 67% draws, averaging 8.67 shots and 4.33 on target per match with xG 1.22, but a higher shot conversion rate of 12% versus the home side’s 8%. Defensively Anyang allows more high-quality chances (average xG against 1.80 and 1.33 goals conceded away), whereas the hosts have clearer ball control (51% possession vs 38%) and a greater volume of attempts. Considering the hosts’ higher xG and more shots along with the very high draw rates of both teams, the most likely outcome is a points split (60% draw, 25% Sangju win, 15% Anyang win).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes comes from season-long numbers: Anyang has BTTS 100% while Sangju 67%, and in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS 80%, which strongly points to both sides scoring. In their last 5 games Sangju scored 4 and conceded 5 (avg 0.8 scored, 1.0 conceded), and Anyang scored 5 and conceded 6 (1.0 scored, 1.2 conceded), so both sides regularly concede. xG analysis shows Sangju produces 1.08 xG and allows 1.07 xG per match, while Anyang produces 1.22 xG and concedes as much as 1.80 xG, suggesting Anyang creates chances but also leaks them more often. Additionally both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, and season averages are 1.0 goals for (Sangju) and 1.0 (Anyang) with average goals conceded 1.0 and 1.33, so the overall statistical picture favors a scenario where both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect 1.44 goals for Sangju Sangmu and 1.15 for Anyang (total 2.59), calculated from xG: home xG_for 1.08 vs xG_against_away 1.80, away xG_for 1.22 vs xG_against_home 1.07. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred in 67% of the home team’s matches and 100% of the away team’s matches, and BTTS is 67%/100%, which strongly favors Over 1.5 (I estimate 88%). The 2.5 line is more balanced: seasonally Over 2.5 is 33% for both teams, and in the last 5 matches the values are 20% and 40%, so despite an xG_total of 2.59 I give Over 2.5 a moderate 45% (Under 55%). Over 3.5 looks unlikely with seasonal 0% for both sides, so I estimate its probability at 8% and recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely half-time outcome is a draw: Sangju were level at the break in 67% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 67%), while Anyang were level at half-time in 100% (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 100%), with average goals scored by half being 0.0 for the home side and 0.67 for the away side (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0 vs scoredAVGHT_away = 0.67). In the second half the home team dominates — Sangju score on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0) and record 67% second-half wins (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 67%), whereas Anyang score 0.33 goals in the second half (scored_2hg_avg_away = 0.33) and register 0% second-half wins (wins_2hg_percentage_away = 0.0). Additionally, the home xG is 1.08 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.08) versus the xG created by the visitors of 1.22 (xg_for_avg_away = 1.22), but Anyang concede on average 1.8 xG defensively (xg_against_avg_away = 1.8) compared to 1.07 xG conceded by Sangju (xg_against_avg_home = 1.07), indicating a weaker away defense. As a result the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time draw at the break and a home win after the match (X/1) — I assign this scenario a 50% probability, draw-to-full-time (X/X) I rate at 30%, and the remaining variants are given low values due to the lack of leads at the break (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 0.0 and leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 0.0).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

70Possession (%)30
Sangju SangmuAnyang
19Shots14
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Shots on target3
Sangju SangmuAnyang
2.22xG1.4
Sangju SangmuAnyang
12Corners5
Sangju SangmuAnyang
83Dangerous attacks43
Sangju SangmuAnyang
10Fouls6
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3Cards2
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.83Goals scored / game1
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1Goals allowed / game1.17
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%Average possession39%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.17Shots on target / game3.83
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.83Shots per game8.67
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.17Shots on target3.83
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7.7%Shot conversion11.5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%Possession39%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.32xG for1.15
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.53xG against1.43
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedAnyang: Balanced
Sangju SangmuAnyang
Accuracy (shots on target)29%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Anyang is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1 pts / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W83% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-5-1
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 at home
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Anyang
WDLLD
Season result split
17% W50% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 20% better for: goals scored per game.

0.83 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1 goals / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1.17 goals / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).

Anyang scoring profile: very strong

Anyang scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)6
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Goals conceded (season)7
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.83Average goals per game2.17
Sangju SangmuAnyang
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Sangju SangmuAnyang
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%2 goals17%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%3 goals0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal100%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
17%2 goals17%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%3 goals0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%Scored in both halves0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
80%BTTS - last 580%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sangju Sangmu is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 0.83 pts / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Anyang - half-time state
0% leading83% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)0.83
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.83
Sangju SangmuAnyang
83%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
67%No goal before half-time67%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.33
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Sangju SangmuAnyang
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
50%No goal after half-time50%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
9
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Anyang - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Anyang - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
83%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaAnyang
Average goals per game 1.832.08 2.17
Both teams scored 83%53% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%33% 33%
Clean sheets 17%30% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%57% 50%
Goal after half-time 83%73% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sangju SangmuYellow cardTae-Joon Park
  2. AnyangYellow cardDong-Jin Kim
  3. Sangju SangmuYellow cardGeon-hee Lee
  4. Sangju SangmuYellow cardTae-Hwan Kim
  5. AnyangSubstitutionOn: Jeong-Hun ParkOff: Geon-Joo Choi
  6. AnyangYellow cardKyung-Won Kwon
  7. Sangju SangmuGoalCheol-Woo Park

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Hyung-Jin KoMatches officiated: 10
4.9Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 220%Home wins50%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Sangju Sangmu's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Anyang. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FC Anyang
4 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
1 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
1 : 3
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 1:1 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Anyang?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 2, Anyang won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

Sangju Sangmu score 0.83 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.00. The K League 1 average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 83% of Anyang's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Anyang in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Anyang 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.