Sangju Sangmu vs FC Seoul: match statistics
Sangju Sangmu vs FC Seoul: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sangju Sangmu played against FC Seoul in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on August 8, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Sangju Sangmu has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. FC Seoul has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Sangju Sangmu scores 1.05 goals per game and allows 1.33. FC Seoul scores 1.67 and allows 0.81. Games in this league average 2.37 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Sangju Sangmu's games and 52% of FC Seoul's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 57%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Seoul has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.50 per game. Sangju Sangmu takes 12.6 shots per game, while FC Seoul takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. FC Seoul leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.05 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sangju Sangmu's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For FC Seoul, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.37 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Seoul lead the table with 13 wins in 21 matches, while Sangju Sangmu have won only 4 games and sit in 11th place. The visitors are highly effective away from home, winning 73% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.73 goals and losing just 9% of their games, whereas the hosts win only 10% of their home fixtures. Seoul’s defense concedes 0.82 goals per away match, significantly fewer than Sangju, who allow an average of 1.60 goals and have kept a clean sheet in none of their home games. Sangju have improved their recent form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, but FC Seoul hold a significant edge in finishing quality, with a 13% shot conversion rate compared with the hosts’ 7%. Similar xG averages—1.66 for Sangju at home and 1.58 for Seoul away—point to a potentially balanced contest, but the visitors’ more reliable defense and stronger away record favor FC Seoul.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal signals are sharply contrasting: Sangju Sangmu’s BTTS rate is only 30%, while FC Seoul’s stands at 73%, well above the league average of 52%. Current form increases the likelihood of goals from both sides, as BTTS landed in 60% of the teams’ last 5 matches, with each side scoring and conceding 7 and 6-7 goals respectively during that period. Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 60% of matches, but FC Seoul averages 1.73 goals per game and creates chances worth 1.58 xG, so they should pose a genuine threat to this defense. The hosts also have attacking arguments: their averages of 1.52 xG and 4.4 shots on target per match compare favourably with FC Seoul’s clean-sheet rate of only 27% and the visitors’ 1.46 xG conceded. The edge for BTTS - Yes is moderate, but the current consistency of both attacks supports a scenario in which each side scores at least one goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have solid attacking numbers: the home side averages 1.60 goals at home, while FC Seoul averages 1.73 away, supporting a scenario with at least two goals. At the same time, their defenses are highly stable, with Sangju Sangmu conceding just 0.80 goals on average and FC Seoul 0.82 goals per match. The expected goals figures point to a closely balanced matchup at 1.34 to 1.31, indicating primarily a total of two or three goals. In their last five matches, both teams averaged 1.4 goals per game, but only 40% of the home side’s matches featured at least three goals, compared with 60% for FC Seoul. The strongest signal points to Under 3.5: as many as 60% of Sangju’s matches and 82% of FC Seoul’s matches ended with no more than three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FC Seoul have a clearly superior overall season record: they win 73% of their matches and average 2.36 points per game, while Sangju Sangmu win 50% of their fixtures with an average of 1.70 points. The visitors start matches very strongly, leading at the break in 6 of 11 games (55%); they concede just 0.09 goals per match before half-time and have kept a clean sheet in 91% of first halves. Sangju have been level at half-time in 50% of their matches, so the draw/away win scenario remains highly realistic; however, Seoul’s stronger first-half record is the more compelling signal in favor of an away lead at the break. After the interval, both teams are attacking-minded, but FC Seoul score an average of 1.0 goal, while the hosts concede an average of 0.4, which supports the visitors’ ability to maintain their advantage. The 2/2 pick is also supported by the season-long difference in results efficiency and the fact that Seoul have lost only 9% of their matches, compared with Sangju Sangmu’s 30% defeat rate.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sangju Sangmu | FC Seoul | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Seoul is 59% better for: goals scored per game.
1.05 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1.67 goals / game - FC Seoul
FC Seoul is 64% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 0.81 goals / game - FC Seoul
Sangju Sangmu scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while FC Seoul keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 games).
FC Seoul scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 games), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sangju Sangmu
Over / Under - FC Seoul
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Seoul is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1.71 pts / game - FC Seoul
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sangju Sangmu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FC Seoul - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sangju Sangmu
FC Seoul
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Sangju Sangmu | Liga | FC Seoul | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.38 | 2.37 | ▲ 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 52% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 29% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | • 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 75% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sangju Sangmu's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against FC Seoul. Games average 3.60 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs FC Seoul?
The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 0:0 FC Seoul. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and FC Seoul?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 3, FC Seoul won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs FC Seoul?
Sangju Sangmu score 1.05 goals per game on average and FC Seoul 1.67. The K League 1 average is 2.37 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 52% of FC Seoul's.
What form are Sangju Sangmu and FC Seoul in?
Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FC Seoul 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs FC Seoul?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sangju Sangmu vs FC Seoul: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


