Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sangju Sangmu plays Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The game is scheduled for September 6, 2026.
Recent form
Sangju Sangmu has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Gwangju has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Sangju Sangmu scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.23. Gwangju scores 0.62 and allows 2.19. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Sangju Sangmu's games and 42% of Gwangju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 31% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sangju Sangmu has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.13 per game. Sangju Sangmu takes 12.7 shots per game, while Gwangju takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Gwangju leads at halftime in 4% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sangju Sangmu's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Gwangju, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 4 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sangju Sangmu | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sangju Sangmu is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 0.4 pts / game - Gwangju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sangju Sangmu is 48% better for: goals scored per game.
0.92 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 0.62 goals / game - Gwangju
Sangju Sangmu is 78% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.23 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 2.19 goals / game - Gwangju
Sangju Sangmu scores in 69% of games (18 of 26 meczów), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 meczów).
Gwangju scores in 42% of games (11 of 26 meczów), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sangju Sangmu
Over / Under - Gwangju
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sangju Sangmu is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 0.65 pts / game - Gwangju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sangju Sangmu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Gwangju - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 4%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sangju Sangmu
Gwangju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Sangju Sangmu | Liga | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.15 | 2.44 | ▲ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 52% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 31% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 30% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 61% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Sangju Sangmu's perspective: 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss against Gwangju. Games average 1.40 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
When do Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju play?
Sangju Sangmu face Gwangju on September 6, 2026 in K League 1. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 0, Gwangju won 1 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?
Sangju Sangmu score 0.92 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.62. The K League 1 average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 42% of Gwangju's.
What form are Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju in?
Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Gwangju 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?
The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.